Update 3 - Early Morning Cold Taxi

I wasn't planning on writing today, but my sleep schedule is all screwed up so I've got some time and I wanted to give you an update. For the first time since May, I accepted work on a full-time freelance project this week since I knew I wouldn't be busy producing content for this site. And that has meant 14 hour days and being up at times I don't normally see. Like 7AM. This is some straight-up bullshit, right here. I know a lot of you get up this early every day. You're the true heroes. I mean, even if you're getting up before the sun rises to assault someone in the park, I still admire your work ethic.

Let's look at the tote-board.

So, we're a little over two days in and just about a quarter of the way there. That may seem like a good pace, but the majority of that was done in the first twelve hours. We'll see what happens. People may be waiting, or I may have over-estimated the demand to keep the site around. I'm genuinely perfectly happy with either scenario.  

(To be clear, I'm not looking to make a living from this site. My goal amount of books to sell to keep this site going is not out of the double digits. After taxes, fees, the cost of doing a small run hardcover printing, shipping, and the costs of running the site, I just want to be able to pay some money to the people who help with the site and anything above that will just mean more time I can put into the site itself. But it won't even get close to minimum wage. If it was just money I was after I'd put these hours in at Denny's.)

So, while this site's future is up in the air, I want to make it clear to the people who have donated that you have nothing to worry about. The amount of content you get will be very similar either way, it's just that some of it will come in a different format (email and the book). You will definitely be getting a bunch of exclusive routines, and if the site doesn't continue, then it just means a bunch more ideas and routines that you have access to that the riff-raff won't.

And I promise you the book is going to be fucking amazing. It won't be hard to be better than most magic books which are 90% telling you where to put your pinky and stuff. But I truly believe if you like this site you'll really treasure the book. It's not just going to be blog posts reprinted in book form. It's going to be it's own thing. You'll see.

UPDATED: The Jerx Volume 1 - The Book

[See the bottom of this post for continuing updates about this project.]

Would you take me out once a week and buy me one of those fancy Starbucks coffees, perhaps a Pumpkin Spice Frappuccino® Blended Crème, if it meant keeping this site going?

Yes?

We are at a fork in the road, you and I. Writing this site has taken up a big chunk of my day for almost half a year now. 

When I was a couple months in to working on this site, I realized I could keep this going indefinitely, if there is an audience for it. The issue is one of time. You see, my day-job is essentially the same as working on this blog -- it's writing, consulting, and creating. And if I spend 25-30 hours a week working on this site, that's 25-30 hours I'm not only not making money, but I'm losing money because I pay people to help with the site. So it's not sustainable. So, for the the sake of, like, paying rent and having food to eat, I've come to the point where that chunk of time needs to go to people who are into what I'm doing enough to support it financially.

When most blogs want to monetize, the first thing they think of is ads. Well, I can't do ads because the readership is too small. And besides that, part of what people like about this site is that I can compare some dumb magic thing to an ISIS beheading video or something and there is no advertiser to worry about upsetting. Without that freedom, I wouldn't be interested in doing the site. 

So for the site to continue, it will need to be reader supported. I kind of look at this site as the small-town newspaper for a community of people who have a particular relationship with magic that isn't what you read about in traditional magic media. The question is, are there enough villagers in this community to keep the newspaper afloat?

It was my friend Andrew Steele who came up with what is, I think, the best and most fair way of seeing if we can make this work. His idea was to follow the public television model. Essentially I've given away half a year's worth of content. I am now giving you the opportunity to back the second half of the year and get something in return if you do.

How much to charge. Well, I left that up to simple math. I estimated how many hours I work on this site in a given week, multiplied that by 25% of my standard hourly rate for freelance work, and then divided that by how man regular readers I think I have. Estimating how many regular readers I have is the difficult part. I can look at the stats on my site, but that counts the people who visit the site because they dislike me, as well as the ones who stumble across the site because they search for something unrelated that I happened to mention like "ISIS beheading videos."

What I end up with when I'm done with that calculation is a somewhat significant chunk of change for the whole year which makes me hesitate. But then I see books and even ebooks in our art that sell for $400, $600, even $1000 dollars and some of the ones I've read absolutely suck dong, so I don't feel so bad asking for a fraction of that to keep this site going.

What I like about this plan is that now the longevity of this site is a problem that solves itself. If there is a community to support it, then we're golden. And if not, then I stop. Stopping the site won't upset me. I still get to have the thoughts and create the routines that make up this blog, I just don't have to write them up, so it's not like I'm missing out on that aspect. What would upset me is if I stopped it when there were enough people out there who cared enough about it to keep it going and I didn't present them that opportunity. 

So that's what we come back to. Would you buy me a fancy $5 coffee once a week to keep the site going? That's $260 for the year for what amounts to a 365 chapter online book AND you will receive The Jerx Volume 1 which collects the best essays and routines from what would be the first year of this site. They will be revised and updated with additional thoughts and all new typos! In addition there will be at least half a dozen unpublished routines that will be unique to the book.

So here's how it works. At the bottom of this post you will find a link to donate. If you want to keep the site going then click on it. There is a price for outside of the US that covers the additional cost of priority shipping internationally. If you are a regular reader of this site and you want to see it continue, you pretty much need to be on board. The readership of this site isn't large enough that it can be supported by a minority of the readers. 

Now, I have a magic number in mind of how many people I need to contribute in order to continue the site as I've been doing it. There are two paths things can take, either enough people donate to back the second half of the year, or they don't. I've tried to set this up so it's a win-win-win for me, the people who enjoy the site, and the people who don't, regardless of what happens. 

Below is what you'll receive if you contribute and we do or don't reach the goal amount.

Here is what you get if you donate and we reach our goal amount.

  • You get to enjoy the second half of year one of the Jerx blog with postings every day.
  • A copy of The Jerx Volume 1. 300+ pages that includes the best of the first year of the site and at least half a dozen new effects that will never be published in any other book. (See below for more details about some of these effects)
  • A hard-copy booklet of an extended essay I wrote called The Amateur At the Kitchen Table, a long treatise on the performance of magic in informal settings and connecting with people via those performances. Writing this essay was the inspiration for launching this site.
  • You'll be on my private email list and receive a monthly email newsletter of short reviews, recommendations, and alternate handlings of new and old magic releases. This is the sort of stuff I didn't write about too much on the blog, as I didn't want the site to just be a critique of other people's stuff. I've distributed this email newsletter for a while now to a small group of friends. If you're supporting the site, then I consider you a friend.
  • A sponsored post on anything you want. If you offer a product or service or if you hate someone's guts, I will write all about it. I won't lie. I won't say your trick is good if it blows. But at  the same time I won't say it blows if it blows either. These entries will be included in the Sunday posts and identified as bought and paid for.
  • And I'll be less likely to talk shit about you, your product or your services if you're a supporter of the site. Yes, this is how the mafia works. "Pay our fee and we won't burn down your bar." I don't mean it that way. It's just, as I said above, I consider anyone who is helping the site to be a friend, and I'm not going to talk shit about my friends (at least not in a serious way).

Here is what you get if you donate and we DON'T reach our goal amount.

  • You will get one EXTREMELY LIMITED EDITION book called The Complete Jerx. I know it will be extremely limited edition because in this case we didn't meet our target amount and our target amount is pretty low. This version of the book will include over a dozen new routines that will never be reprinted in any other book or online.
  • The hardcopy version of The Amateur At The Kitchen Table.
  • The newsletter mentioned above.
  • You will receive a day's worth of consulting/writing on any project you're involved with. This is dumb for me to do because my day-rate is significantly more than the donation amount, but if you're involved in anything creative I'm sure there is some aspect of the project I could help out with. And I would be happy to help someone out with their project who was kind enough to contribute to mine.

The initial donation period will go for approximately a week from today, although the book will be available (without all the extras) at the same price until it is released. The blog will be on hiatus during this period. At the end of the donation period I'll know if we've met the goal or if we're nowhere near where we need to be. If we've met the goal I will pick right back up with daily posts. If we're nowhere near, then I'll shut this site down (I won't delete the contents, I just won't be publishing new posts).

Some of the effects that will ONLY be available in the book, The Jerx Volume 1 are:

And Now He Is Me: You show your friend some of the highlights from the 1978 movie, Magic, starring Anthony Hopkins as a psychotic magician/ventriloquist. You watch a few of the best parts but focus on the scene where he terrifies/seduces Ann-Margret with a Do As I Do routine. You then re-enact the scene with your spectator, through failure then triumph. Then things take a turn as the cards in the real world transform to those from the film, all culminating with you arguing with a puppet that unexpectedly appears on your hand about whether you should murder your spectator or not.

Dear Penthouse Forum: A story deck trick (that actually uses the full deck, unlike my other ones) that is genuinely funny and has a twist ending.

I Know What You Need: You have your friend over for dinner and she secretly decides what she would like to have based on dozens of options. Without ever telling you anything you place a delivery order (or you can do the cooking yourself) and when the food shows up it is exactly what she had secretly chosen. You then show that you didn't actually know what she wanted to eat, but you were able to get in her mind and swap what she was craving for what you had planned on ordering in the first place.

A Most Unusual Camera: Your spectator's cellphone camera takes pictures of things 5 minutes before they happen.

You want in? Here's your chance. 

F.A.Q.

Q. I can't afford $260. Can I just send you something less as a general donation?
A. No. Look, I really appreciate the thought, but if $5 a week is too much to spare (and trust me, I've been in that position when I was younger) then you shouldn't be giving any money to some magic blog. Keep your money and hope enough other people support it to keep it going. My goal is not to wring as much money out of this as possible. My goal is give people who can support the site the opportunity to.

Q. How do I know you're not going to take my money and run off with it?
A. Well... you don't I guess. You've caught me in the midst of the world's dumbest con. I thought I would spend hundreds of hours writing an extremely narrowly focused blog with limited appeal in the hopes that some of the fans of the site would back the second half of the year. Look, the people who will be handling the finances for this and the delivery of the book are AC Costello and Michael Sullivan. They have spotless paypal records and have perfect ebay feedback scores going back 15 and 20 years respectively. But besides that, I would hope that if you've read this blog for any amount of time that you see beyond the crass, obscene, and impudent persona, and have come to see me as a genuine person who is not here to take advantage of anyone. I know magic has a history of people taking money for projects and then just being like, "Peace out, bitches," but that is not what I'm about. If this is a success, my goal is to keep this thing going well into the future, so I'm not going to flake out on you.

Q. When will the book be released?
A. Since it's a collection of the best of the first year, then it will come out when the first year is complete. If we don't reach our goal for continuing The Jerx blog, then the book will come out in the late winter, early spring.

Q. Will it be hardcover or softcover.
A. Hard, baby.

Q. Can I buy more than one?
A. Hell yeah. That's what I would do. Buy a dozen or a gross. Get on board before I'm recognized as a true genius and these books are worth a fortune.

Q. I come here at least once a week, and $5 a week is no issue for me, but I'm not going to donate.
A. Hey, that's not a question. But that's perfectly fine. Just know that the sustainability of this site is predicated on people in your position donating. So if you think, "Oh, I'm sure others will pick up the slack," that's not the case. There are no others. It's just us. I don't want a single person to pay if they don't think it's worth it. But don't come to me and complain about the site not being here if you don't contribute.

Q. So what exactly will happen to the site if you don't reach your goal? 
A. Poof! Well, not like I did with my old site. This old posts will still remain, and I may check in on a very irregular basis, but the daily postings will end.

Q. Do you want to keep doing the site?
A. Yeah, I like doing it a lot. And I have a lot of ideas for longer-term projects I want to do with it. But unfortunately I'm very much an all or nothing type of person. The site only interests me as a daily publication, but obviously that's a big time commitment. I also think online is my best outlet as a writer. It allows me to do timely things, visual things, and incorporate all sorts of media from around the web. But, that being said, if we don't reach our goal, then I think people will still be satisfied with similar content in the book and via the email newsletter.

Q. Okay, I'm in. What do I have to do?
A. Click that bad-boy below.

Update 2 - October 13th - 3:12 AM

It is so strange for me to not write a post for this site. It feels like trying to go to sleep without brushing my teeth first -- like I'm forgetting something. There are very few things in my life I've ever done everyday for 6 months. I mean, like other than basic biological things. Have I ever gone a day without peeing?

Well... have I? Answer me, dammit. 

Sorry. Lost my mind for a second there.

The fundraising continues. You know, people always complain about public television's pledge drives, but I always kind of liked them. I find something comforting about them. It's like, "Oh, here they are, interrupting the Peter, Paul, and Mary special again, just like the did last year, and the year before." I have a thing for traditions, even if they stink. 

Update 1 - Oct 12th - 11:00 AM

First, I want to thank those of you who have already contributed. I will be emailing you individually in the coming days, but let me say a general thanks now.

A couple people have asked about donating by subscription, and Jack Shalom wrote in with this astute email.

I just paid via Paypal to subscribe to your site. It's well worth it.

A suggestion: I work for WBAI radio, (99.5 FM NYC) a listener-sponsored radio station that uses the model you are using, so I have some experience in this area. An amount like $260 at one time is a lot for many folks.

But...there are ways to set up recurring monthly donations credited from one's credit card or bank account. A recurring donation of $24/mo for a year is a lot easier for many to handle than $260 at once. I think your response rate would be much greater.

Just something to think about depending on how things go in the next week or two.

Now, he is surely right about this, but I want to explain where my head is at. I don't want supporting this site to be, in any way, a hardship on anyone. So if this isn't an amount you're comfortable dropping on a magic product, then I'd prefer you keep your money because I feel like you can put it to better use.

This is probably bad business sense on my part, but just as a human I would feel bad taking money from someone for whom this amount isn't well within their impulse purchase point. 

Sundry Drive No. 15

We've all seen the disturbing before and after images of heroin addiction, which is why I was quite disturbed when Connor Jacobs wrote in to bring Thom Peterson's Penguin Live portrait to my attention.

Why on earth Penguin would think it's appropriate or responsible to include drug paraphernalia in the image is beyond me. But what's even sadder is to see how Thom has deteriorated in the short while since this lecture occurred.


I watched Casshan Wallace's At The Table lecture earlier this week and it was definitely one of my favorite ones so far. I wasn't too familiar with Casshan, other than his effect Melting Point, so I want to bring him to your attention if you haven't followed his stuff either. His lecture is more of a collection of ideas than, like, hyper-polished routines. But I actually prefer that sort of lecture. One of my favorite things he taught was this ungimmicked, impromptu card change in the pocket.

His youtube channel has some great stuff and is criminally under-watched. I like when anyone challenges themselves to come up with tricks in a certain amount of time. Casshan had one project on his youtube channel where, for a month, he was trying to come up with a trick a day.

Then he went completely off the rails and challenged himself to come up with a new trick, every hour, for a full day (and to film and upload them to youtube within the hour). Yeah, some of the ideas are sort of half-baked, but so what? I like seeing magic ideas in their embryonic state. 

I always feel like we should do a better job supporting creativity in magic, so I hope you'll check out Cash's youtube channel. I want this guy to stick around and keep inventing new stuff because if this is what he's coming up with at 19, I can't wait to see him with another 10 years of creating under his belt. 


As per the Distracted Artist presentation, here's a dog I "absent-mindedly" folded while getting lunch with a friend. "That's awesome!" she said.

"Huh? What is?" 

"That dog."

"Where?" I look at the bill. "Oh, this? Hmmm.... I don't see it." I'm holding it upside-down. Then I turn it over. "Ah, okay, yeah now I can kind of see it."


Get yourself one of those new extra-bright D'lites. Then, the next time you're going down on a woman (You know, if you save up enough money for it or something) in a dimly lit room, gently slide it inside of her on one of your fingers and leave it in there. Then pull back a little and calmly say, "Huh, this is weird." Don't fucking alarm her, for god's sake. She's in a vulnerable position. She will prop herself up on her elbows and look down at you. "Look what happens when I touch you right here," you say and then put your finger inside her and inside the D'lite and she will see light come pouring out of her vagina. "Is that your g-spot or something?" you say, innocently.

Dear Jerxy: What's Your Origin Story?

Dear Jerxy: I'm curious how you got into magic in the first place. Your approach seems a little different than the norm. Is there another magician who inspired your way of performing/thinking about magic? Thanks!

Writing Your Biography in Wolverhampton

Dear Writing:

This is going to be an underwhelming answer, I'm sure. No, there isn't really another magician who has inspired my point of view. 

The story of how people get into magic is almost universally dull. "Well, I was 8-years old," they'll say, "and I got a magic set for Christmas." Ooooohhhh... okay. Well, that explains it. 

Yes, I had a magic set when I was young. I also had fucking Perfection. But that didn't make me spend the rest of my life shoving little shapes into similarly shaped depressions. (Oh dear god, I just found the explanation for my sex addiction.)

Everyone had a magic set, just like everyone had legos, and everyone had a nerf football. I think when we ask, "How did you get into magic?" what we're asking is what was it about magic that captured you as a young boy or girl. Possession of a magic set doesn't really answer the question. Millions of kids have magic sets, so using that to explain your interest in magic is like if I said, "What got you into carpentry?" and you said, "My dad owned a hammer."

What got me into magic is that I was a genuine, Dennis the Menace style, little troublemaking kid.

When I was 7, my friend's dad taught me how to vanish a cigarette. I carried this information with me and would use it from time to time when I could snag someone's cigarette, but it wasn't some big life-changing moment for me. Cut to next Halloween and I've dumped my candy all over the floor and I'm doing the cigarette vanish with a roll of Smarties (the American version -- chalky candy in a cigarette size roll). Now it's the next summer, and I'm a candy-hungry, rambunctious 8-year old, with no money, walking around the little convenience store on the edge of my neighborhood. I looked at the container of Smarties and thought, "What if instead of vanishing the Smarties completely, I did the 'vanish' but then pretended to place them back in with the rest of the candy?" And thus began my notorious weeks-long career as The Cylindrical Three-Inch-Long Candy Bandit. 

The cigarette vanish was only good for a few things, so I knew I had to expand my repertoire if I wanted to work my way up to some Bonkers or a Zagnut bar. So I Dewey Decimal'd my way over to the magic section at my public library and found The Amateur Magician's Handbook by Henry Hay. When I cracked open the book I fell in love with the art of magic. No, I'm just kidding, I just saw a whole bunch of more ways to shoplift. I even imagined myself as an adult, walking into a jewelry store, asking to see their most expensive diamond ring, doing a DeManche change for an identical but worthless ring, and then walking out. That would just be how I would make a living, I figured. Stealing million dollar rings with "amateur" sleight-of-hand.

My life of crime was not meant to be, however. You see, I lived in a neighborhood that was teeming with kids. It is one of the things I am most grateful for in my life, to have been born in a middle-class suburban neighborhood full of young families in a time before video games and computers had really taken hold in the culture. My entire youth was endless games of street football, basketball, tag, hide and go seek, snow forts, elaborate Star Wars and GI Joe battles, go-kart races, and dirt clod wars on the site of new housing construction. And it was at the end of one of these long, sticky, summer days, when a bunch of us were strewn out on someone's front yard, under the stars, that I taught about a dozen guys how to steal candy (or, as you would think of it, the basics of sleight of hand). This, as it turns out, was a mistake. You see, one thief in town can slip by unnoticed, but a dozen? Well, it turns out that the guy who owned the convenience store was catching on to a seemingly peculiar fad that had popped up amongst 7-11 year old boys in the waning weeks of that summer. Kids would come in, pick up some candy, transfer it to their other hand, and put it back with the rest. Then they'd shove their hands in their pockets and leave. A parade of kids all with some burning desire to pick up candy and take a look at it for a moment before heading out. Then one day we showed up to the store and there was a big sign, "No Unaccompanied Minors." And thus ended our mini-Ocean's 11 heist team. Which is just as well, as my budding conscience would have prevented me from ripping people off soon anyway.

But that is where the sleight-of-hand seed was planted and I always found myself coming back to that section of the library to check out the magic books. I didn't perform much but I was always fascinated with things that weren't what they seemed so I read a lot about magic, con men, pranks, hoaxes, and anything like that. 

I do sometimes wonder if it was my unusual introduction to magic that caused me to approach it in what feels like a different way from they typical perspective. But I don't think that's it. When I watch some of these live lectures I often hear people say that what got them into magic is that they were "painfully shy" or they weren't good in social situations and that magic was a tool for them to get to know people or interact with them. I get that, but that was never the case for me. I've always been completely at ease around people. I was the funny kid, I was smart, played lacrosse and rugby for my high school, but I was also involved with the "nerdy" extracurriculars like marching band and theater. So I had friends across the social strata. And I connect well with people naturally. So for me to say, "Can I show you a trick?" that wasn't a way to connect with people, in fact it usually just got in the way of the interaction we had already established. So I learned early on that anything that was about me or my skill was less interesting to those people than just hanging out with them like a normal human being. And if I wanted to do magic that built on our interaction, I needed to make the centerpiece them, or the moment, or the experience. It took me 20 years to figure out ways to consistently do that and this site is, in part, an exploration of that process.

Here's the thing, a lot of you who got into magic as a social crutch no longer need it as one, yet you continue to perform in the same style you did when you first started. A style that is meant to be about you and your incredible abilities. A style that is alright when you're the quiet or socially awkward kid because it pulls you out of your shell. But if you've evolved past that stage in your life, then performing in that same style will keep you from developing further in that area. The leg braces that once helped you walk will also be the things that keep you from running.

Dear Mentalists: I Love this Website!

Wow! That's really kind of you to say. I put a lot of effort into it. 

I mean, you just said you love this website, which is really nice. Thank you. 

You don't love this website? No... but you said you did earlier. You read it in the first person so that means you do. What? That's not how language works? Hmmm... you make a compelling point.

And yet! There are mentalists everywhere, everyday who use Deddy Corbuzier's Free Will principle like it's something that fools people. (If you're not familiar with this principle feel free to skip this post as it wont make much sense to you.)

It doesn't. Well, it fools people exactly half of the time, when you end up reading the prediction. The other half of the time it's confusing at best and completely transparent at worst. If this isn't obvious to you, then you have been turning a blind eye to your audience. You need to get better at discerning when your audience is fooled and when they're confused or just being nice. I've probably tested a dozen mentalism concepts in the focus-testing I've done and this is the one that consistently raises the most red flags with people. Again, half the time. The other half of the time it's perfect.

We want to believe there's a logic to it when the spectator reads the prediction. There's not. I'll prove it to you. Next time you go to someone's birthday, write this in their card.

You hope I have a Happy Birthday. Happy Birthday to me.

They will be confused. This is not how we communicate with people. And yet this is exactly what we're expecting a spectator to accept at the climax of a magic trick. 

But don't worry, I've fixed it for you. 

Let's say you have a trick where you end up predicting where the spectator will choose to put 3 different objects. This is a standard effect that uses the free will principle. The one I use the most is Forced Will by Jonas Ljung off the DVD 21.

The prediction in this trick looks something like this.

Now, we are going to make one tiny, tiny adjustment that in and of itself will change the nature of the prediction.

Ah, look! We've just added quotes to it. But what does that mean? At this point, who knows. But the implication is that this isn't just a statement. No, this is something that someone said, or will say, probably aloud. And the fact that it's in quotes suggest that the person who wrote it on the card is not necessarily the "I" in that sentence.

We're on our way.

You start the effect and talk about how you're working on your ability to predict the future. "In a way, when you know the decisions people will make and the actions they will take, you are almost able to script life like it's a play. I can know well in advance just the right thing to say. Or I can know what others will say -- what words will match their actions. So as I get good at predicting the future, these interactions that I have with people almost feel pre-determined, like we're reading dialogue in a play."

The bold and italics above... you see what we're doing here, yes? We're establishing two different paths we can refer back to later in the effect.

You continue, "As of now I can't really predict complex human decisions, but I can predict simple ones. And I'll show you what I mean about scripting the future. On this folded business card I have a line of dialogue for you [the slightest possible beat] to hold onto. It's the last line of this little play we're in right now. Keep it safe. I'm going to want you to check my work later."

"Check my work" is a line I got from Jimmy Fingers' Free Will routine he does in his Penguin Live lecture. I like the ambiguity of it as it suggests both reading it themselves or looking at it after you read it later.

Now you go through the process of the trick.

You get to the end of the trick, it's time for the prediction to be read. Here is how you lead up to it.

If you read it
"Remember I said that by knowing the decisions people will make I can always know the right thing to say well in advance? Well, I gave you my last line of dialogue in this conversation to hold onto before we even started, can I see it? It wasn't just any dialogue, it was my prediction for what was going to happen. Something I wrote weeks in advance. [You read the prediction then hand it to your spectator to verify.]"

This makes perfect sense. 

If they read it
"Remember I said I had a line of dialogue for you -- your last line of dialogue for this little play? That I could predict the words for you to say that would match your actions? You've been holding onto your last line of dialogue the whole time. Read it out for us and put some pizzaz into it -- really sell it." 

This makes perfect sense too. And telling them to "really sell it" implies that this was always intended to be a line of dialogue read by someone else. 

Not only does it completely camouflage the Free Will principle, the notion that seeing the future allows you to script lines for yourself or others is just a more interesting idea than "I know where you will put these three objects," even if -- at heart -- it amounts to the same thing.

Opia

What follows is a variation on the trick Windows by Andy Nyman. That trick involves people thinking of a memory associated with an emotion and you naming that emotion. I found that some people find this trick a little too believable, (“I thought of a happy memory and you were able to tell I was thinking of a happy memory… so what?")

So this is a variation I’ve used on the premise with people I suspect might have that reaction.

The emotions used come from here.

Opia

Effect: Your spectator chooses a card with the definition of an obscure emotion on it. They concentrate on the emotion and form a picture of it in their mind. You're able to tell them the emotion they're feeling a describe parts of the picture as well.

Method: Get 10 index cards and write one of the following words and definitions on each card. Write out the cards so the word in italics in each definition is at the end of the first line on each card (don't actually write it in italics, of course).

lachesism
n. the desire to be struck by disaster—to survive a plane crash, to lose everything in a fire,
to plunge over a waterfall—which would put a kink in the smooth arc of your life, and forge it into something hardened and flexible and sharp, not just a stiff prefabricated beam that barely covers the gap between one end of your life and the other.

Rückkehrunruhe
n. the feeling of returning home after an immersive trip only to find it fading rapidly from your awareness—to the extent you have to keep reminding yourself that it happened at all, even though it felt so vivid just days ago—which makes you wish you could smoothly cross-dissolve back into everyday life, or just hold the shutter open indefinitely and let one scene become superimposed on the next, so all your days would run together and you’d never have to call cut.

chrysalism
n. the amniotic tranquility of being indoors during a thunderstorm, listening to waves of rain pattering against the roof like an argument upstairs, whose muffled words are unintelligible but whose crackling release of built-up tension you understand perfectly.

opia 
n. the ambiguous intensity of looking someone in the eye, which can feel simultaneously invasive and vulnerable—their pupils glittering, bottomless and opaque—as if you were peering through a hole in the door of a house, able to tell that there’s someone standing there, but unable to tell if you’re looking in or looking out.

kenopsia
n. the eerie, forlorn atmosphere of a place that’s usually bustling with people but is now abandoned and quiet—a school hallway in the evening, an unlit office on a weekend, vacant fairgrounds—an emotional afterimage that makes it seem not just empty but hyper-empty, with a total population in the negative, who are so conspicuously absent they glow like neon signs.

vemödalen
n. the frustration of photographing something amazing when thousands of identical photos already exist—the same sunset, the same waterfall, the same curve of a hip, the same closeup of an eye—which can turn a unique subject into something hollow and pulpy and cheap, like a mass-produced piece of furniture you happen to have assembled yourself.

mal de coucou
n. a phenomenon in which you have an active social life but very few close friends—people who you can trust, who you can be yourself with, who can help flush out the weird psychological toxins that tend to accumulate over time—which is a form of acute social malnutrition in which even if you devour an entire buffet of chitchat, you’ll still feel pangs of hunger.

vellichor
n. the strange wistfulness of used bookstores, which are somehow infused with the passage of time—filled with thousands of old books you’ll never have time to read, each of which is itself locked in its own era, bound and dated and papered over like an old room the author abandoned years ago, a hidden annex littered with thoughts left just as they were on the day they were captured.

kairosclerosis
n. the moment you realize that you’re currently happy—consciously trying to savor the feeling—which prompts your intellect to identify it, pick it apart and put it in context, where it will slowly dissolve until it’s little more than an aftertaste.

liberosis
n. the desire to care less about things—to loosen your grip on your life, to stop glancing behind you every few steps, afraid that someone will snatch it from you before you reach the end zone—rather to hold your life loosely and playfully, like a volleyball, keeping it in the air, with only quick fleeting interventions, bouncing freely in the hands of trusted friends, always in play.

Bring out the stack of index cards and give them to your spectator to flip through and read some of the definitions. Tell them these are new words you're trying to learn for obscure emotions. People will be interested in them. If they're not, they're probably not right for this trick.

Do a Charlier shuffle to supposedly mix the cards. You could, if you want, just force one of the cards on someone and then have them feel that emotion and you could look in their eyes and read that emotion in them. 

Or, with some memory work, you can give someone a free selection, cut the cards at the selection, peek the bottom card, and then know which one they are thinking of. Here's how you do that. It may seem like a lot of work, but it took me less than 15 minutes and I'm not good with memory stuff.

First, you need to know a rhyming peg system.

1 - gun
2 - shoe
3 - tree
4 - door
5 - hive
6 - bricks
7 - heaven
8 - weight
9 - wine
10 - hen

If it takes you more than two minutes to memorize that, you have a tumor or something.

Second you need to familiarize yourself, generally, with the definitions on the cards.

Now you are going to associate each peg word with the italicized word on the card, and a general concept of what that definition is about. So let's go through them.

1 - gun - fire - Guns fire. Being shot would be you suffering a personal tragedy. The first word is about wanting to struck by a disaster.

2 - shoe - trip - You trip over your shoes. Taking a trip. The second word is about taking a trip and having it fade from your memory.

3 - tree - thunderstorm - Picture a tree struck by lightning in a thunderstorm. The third word is about the comfort of being inside during a thunderstorm.

4 - door - eye - Eyes are the doorway to the soul (yes, they usually say window, but google it, they say doorway to the soul too.) The fourth word is about looking someone in the eye and that being an intrusive and vulnerable position to be in at the same time.

5 - hive - bustling - Bustling/buzzling. Buzz, bees, hive. Think of all of the bees in the hive, then picture an empty hive. The fifth word is about the eerie feeling of being in an empty place that is usually filled with people.

6 - bricks - photos - Think of taking a picture with a brick for a camera. How futile that would be. The sixth word is about the futile feeling of taking a picture of something that has already been photographed 1000s of times before.

7 - heaven - life - Heaven comes after life. Social life. The seventh word is about having an active social life but very few close friends. (A common cold reading concept.)

8 - weight - bookstore - Think of books being used to weigh something down. The eighth word is about the wistfulness of old bookstores.

9 - wine - happy - Wine makes you happy (you lush). The ninth word is about being happy and recognizing you're happy in the moment and dissecting your happiness and making yourself unhappy because of it.

10 - hen - loosen your grip - Imagine you hold a bird in your hand. You loosen your grip to let it fly away. It's a hen, it doesn't fly, it just falls out of your hand. The tenth word is about the desire to let go of things and care less about them.

So, let's go back. You do a Charlier shuffle. You allow someone to cut the cards and take the top card. You tell them to read that card over and to embrace the feeling it describes and maybe picture a scenario they can imagine feeling it in. As they read you peek your keyword which is the last word in the first row of the definition of the card on the bottom. Toss the rest of the cards over to the person as well.

Now you have some time to do your mental gymnastics. You peeked the word "trip." You trip over your shoes. Shoe = 2. That means she has the next card, card three. Three = tree. You imagine a tree struck by lightning in a thunderstorm. She's thinking of the word that means taking comfort indoors during a thunderstorm. You ask her to close her eyes and let this feeling wash over her then ask her to open her eyes and look directly in yours. You stare deep into her eyes.

"I feel a sense of... contentment or calmness... I think. But there's something else going on too. Are you picturing yourself in a certain place? You're in your home, right? In bed or on the couch or something? There's something else going on though... oh, I know. The thunderstorm one, yes? You are feeling the comfort of being inside during a thunderstorm."

Most of these words will give you a little more to talk about than if you're just guessing a standard emotion. You can usually picture the type of place they're in physically where they might be feeling this. And a lot of these feelings are multilayered, which is a nice thing to be able to pick up on if you claim to really be absorbing the emotion coming from them. Whereas if someone is just thinking of "happy" that's really a kind of straightforward emotion. 

Another nice thing is if they pick "opia" you can say, "You're not just imagining this feeling, you're actually feeling it right now." Which is kind of an interesting moment where they are genuinely feeling the emotion they're supposed to be thinking of.

Don't bother learning the words themselves. The fact that you don't know the actual words just reinforces the notion of you picking up on the feeling itself, rather than you having peeked the word somehow.

As to why you have the cards in the first place, you can make the point that reading more obvious emotions like sadness and happiness is less of a challenge because that's something we're trained to do since the time we're children. So you're trying to learn to read these more subtle emotions.

Like most of the effects I describe here, it's probably best used in a casual, informal setting (although, depending on the audience, there are probably other places to use it as well). Unlike Nyman's great trick, this isn't a simple, impromptu effect, which is its main drawback. But if you make up this set of cards, you'll have an interesting and rich effect that can easily lead to some deep and engaging conversations. (And without the possibility of someone having to stir up emotions related to a botched circumcision, a favorite aunt being trampled by a marching band, or some other legitimately painful memory.)

Mad Man

I've been having a lot of fun performing this trick. I was going to write it up like I have others, but I realized what I liked most about the trick was the presentation which just gives you an excuse to ramble on like a dipshit. And I knew I probably wouldn't be able to convey the tone of the patter through writing alone. So below you will find a pseudo performance done by my friend for a picture of a squirrel. 

The inspiration for this trick is Ad Space by David Regal. The effect is pretty much the same, but I use different sleights. My presentation was indirectly inspired by the Twilight Zone episode, Time Enough At Last.

You can probably figure out your own sleights to make this work. What I do is:

  • A one hand bottom deal to force the card without showing its back

  • A deck switch when I get the marker

  • A multiple turnover