The Juxe: Favorite Newish Music - July 2020

Here is some of the stuff I’ve been digging recently.

Anaphylaxis by PUP (Toronto, Ontario)

There is a dearth of late-90s, early 2000s style pop-punk trash being released these days. PUP is probably at the top of the genre. This is their most recent single.


The Forty-Ninth Parallel by Kacy & Clayton (Wood Mountain, Saskatchewan)

Kacy & Clayton are a folk-music duo, but this song leans heavy into country music territory. But not like some Miranda Lambert modern-country stuff. This sounds like country music from 50 years ago. I think. I don’t really know anything about country music.


Ooh, La, La by Run the Jewels

I can’t stand much of the sleepy, sullen rap coming from young males these days. It’s women and old guys who are bringing the energy I like in the hip-hop game at the moment.

Run the Jewels, a couple 45-year old guys, bring it again on their newest album. This is the second single.


Green Stone by Shadow Show (Detroit, Michigan)

Shadow Show is a three-piece from Detroit putting out some indie/garage/psychedelic music that is right in my wheelhouse. Their new album, Silhouettes, is all strong. My favorite song from it at the moment is this one…

Revisiting Practical Magic Week's Billet Post

Five years ago, I wrote about six benefits of creating business cards for some other entity (not yourself) and then using them in situations where you would either use your own business card or blank business card stock for billets/center tears or that sort of thing.

Here were those benefits again:

1. You're not destroying your own business card.

2. You're not carrying around a little pad of blank paper like a little fancy-boy.

3. It's a normal object that you would expect to find in a wallet.

4. If you use your business card or a blank card, then the idea of duplicates is inherent in the prop itself. You don't ever buy just one business card, or one piece of blank paper. These items only exist in multiples. So it's not difficult for a spectator to hazard a guess that there might be a switch involved. Alternatively, if you open your wallet, flip through some stuff, and toss out someone else's business card, this feels much more like it's the only one of these that can possibly be in play. Want to ramp up this singularity even more? Take a pen and write "4:00 Tues." in one of the corners on the business card. Do the same on a pre-folded duplicate. You can now switch these in and out and a duplicate will be so far away from people's thoughts.

5. They can be an unspoken status symbol. Remember, you can create a business card for anyone you like: someone prominent in your area, someone in the entertainment industry, someone in politics. You don't make a big deal about this. Let the other person mention it. For example, maybe I'm about to show someone a trick, I open my wallet looking for something for them to write on and toss Elon Musk's business card onto the table and say to myself, "yeah, I don't need this...." The other person might look at the card before or after the effect and ask why I have it. I'd just be like, "Oh, we were at the same event a couple weeks ago. He wants me to do his Christmas party this year. But that time of year is all about family for me. And as far as I'm concerned, fossil fuels are the future."

6. For me, this is the biggest benefit. Your business cards and blank pieces of paper are presentational dead ends. But you can create a business card to use in one effect that could lead the conversation in any direction you'd like it to go for a follow-up effect. You could have a business card for someone at the FBI, for a parapsychologist, for a futurist, for a casino CEO, for anybody. Why do you have this business card? You've been asked to consult, or give your input on a project, or they want to study you. Whatever, but it's all very fluid. If you're going to perform more than one effect in a casual situation then the transition has to be completely natural, and this gambit allows you to seamlessly flow into any other type of effect. 


I’m bringing this post back up because I have a little gift for you from Myles Thornton. They’re a couple of fake business cards that you might consider using in your interactions with people. Here they are (larger files are available at the end of this post—you can just dump them on a business card printing site and have 500 cards for like $10)

Pyschic copy 2.png

Exorcist  copy.png

I don’t use them as a straightforward prop in a trick. I wouldn’t say, for example, “I met a psychic. Here’s her business card. Want to see something strange with this psychic’s business card?” That’s a little too pat for me. It’s a little too neat. It makes the business card feel like a prop in a trick instead of this thing that’s maybe legitimate that might just lead into something interesting.

Instead, I choose to use stuff like this indirectly.

For example, I’ll just use one of these cards like scrap paper. I just happen to need to have something written down for some other purpose (maybe a trick, maybe just to jot something down), and this is the first thing I find in my wallet to use. I don’t mention what it is. It’s just something to write on. Now, after that trick or demonstration is over, then they may notice what the card is, or I may point out what it is and steer the conversation in a direction based on the nature of the business card.

So maybe I turn the card over at the end and act as if I’m just now noticing what this card is. “Oh, god. This woman was a real kook.” Then I’ll tell some story of how I encountered her and ended up with her business card. Maybe there was some poorly organized magic convention I went to a couple months ago…

“And because it wasn’t clear what the purpose of the convention was, half the attendees were people with an interest in sleight-of-hand and that sort of thing. And the other half were a bunch of weirdo Wiccan chicks. This woman and I started talking during the lunch break. At first I thought she was fairly normal but the more she talked the more I realized she was a nutjob.

“She did show me one weird thing though… hmmm… maybe we can try it…”

Or you can act like you just stumble across the card in your wallet as you’re putting some money away and then you’re like, “Check this shit out,” and then you let the conversation roll into an explanation of why you have it, and let that seemingly inspire a demonstration of something. That will feel very natural, which is what you want in the moment. In retrospect the person might think, “Hey… was he setting me up for that?” But at that point, it doesn’t matter that much. The truth is, people don’t dislike feeling “set up” for something that was done for their own entertainment.

Often I’ll use fake business cards to plant a seed for a later performance. For example, with the exorcist’s card, if I showed that to someone or left it out to be seen on my desk at my workplace (if I had a desk, and had a workplace) someone would be bound to ask me why I have it. I’d keep it a little vague. “I met up with him because I had some questions about this thing I’m working on.” Then, at a later date, I can reintroduce the subject, “Remember that business card I had of that priest? Next time you come over, I have to show you this ring he let me take from his collection of… haunted objects, I guess? Or cursed objects. Or whatever the hell he calls them.” And now I’m setting up some future weird demonstration with some “old, creepy ring.”

This is such a simple technique, but I’ve found people really enjoy when you foreshadow something like this. It automatically sets your magic apart from what they’ve seen before. Most people, when they think of magic, think of something that has a definitive starting point, takes two minutes, and ends and it’s over and done with. To build up the effect with a little backstory is a fairly gentle way to capture people with a more immersive style of magic.

Here are the larger files. Thanks again to Myles for sharing them.

Exorcist

Psychic

Psychic UK

The Jerx DAP Switch

This tabled switch is something I use all the time. I assume it’s a standard move but if there’s someone who should be credited here, let me know. It’s definitely ideal for one-on-one social magic, so maybe it’s not in wide usage for those who perform outside of that situation. In the recent newsletter I mentioned I’d show it, so here it is

It can be used for pretty much anything. Cards, coins, bills, balled up napkins, business cards, rings, keys, cellphones, Sharpies. Really anything but matchboxes. NEVER USE IT WITH MATCHBOXES! Just kidding, you can use it with matchboxes, chapstick, silverware, condoms, receipts, whatever you can reasonably fit in your hand.

If you’re looking right at the switch, it will sometimes look perfect, sometimes it will look like there’s a little glitch in the matrix, and sometimes it will look bad. But that’s okay, it’s not meant to be done with someone burning the object. (Very few switches are.) It’s a move that happens in their periphery.

For now I’ll call this The Jerx DAP Switch. “Jerx” because putting the name of this site on it will encourage people who don’t like me to give me a proper credit for it if there is one. And DAP is an acronym for the method of the switch: Ditch And Present. [UPDATE: See end for a credit.]

The item to be switched in rests in your lap. At some point you pick it up with your left hand. If it’s small enough to palm, you can do so. Usually I’ll just hold the object in my hand and rest my index finger on the table.

The item to be switched is in your right hand. You are going to Ditch the object in your right hand and Present the object in your left hand, in the action of bringing your hands together. You must come up with a reason for putting the object from one hand to the other (either freeing up the right hand, or setting the object to the left).

Beyond having a motivation, the other important thing is to do it at a point in the routine when people aren’t burning the object. So you just watch their eyes and wait for them to look away from your hands. If they’re legitimately staring directly at the object, that’s a bad time to do any switch.

As far as the ditch goes, you can drop off the object as you swing your right hand in, or you can pull the object into your lap as you pull it off the table.

Here’s my friend demonstrating both techniques. First with a playing card and then with a condom

5SecondsApp_615314773.856427.gif
5SecondsApp_615314753.299015.gif

Now, to state what should be obvious, these are just demonstrations of the moment of the switch itself. But the switch isn’t done as a trick. (That is, it’s not like, “Watch this card change to this card!”) It’s done in service to another trick. In reality you wouldn’t set something down from where you just picked it up. You would take the item away with your left hand and set it aside. And you likely wouldn’t want to do such an overt change, as with the condom. You’d want to switch a gimmicked card or coin for a normal card or coin; one cased, shuffled deck for a cased, stacked deck; one regular condom for a condom of the same brand with a pin hole punched in it so you can get her pregnant and she’ll be forced to love you forever. That sort of thing.

[CREDIT: It looks like there are several similar things that have been written up in the past, as I expected. The earliest one I can find (but I would assume it predates even this as a basic concept) is Marlo’s Propelled Lapping which was written up in The New Jinx (thanks to EA for the credit).

You’ll find it more valuable if you think of it as more of a general concept than just as a card switch, however. Toss something in your lap with your right hand and bring out something similar looking with your left. Do this when they’re looking at your face and not your hands, and it does not matter what your technique is. Your hands can be six inches apart. If they spot movement and they look at your hands they will just assume the movement was you switching the item from one hand to the other.

But as I wrote about in the newsletter, this isn’t something you’d want to do right before or right after handing something out to be examined. And you wouldn’t want to do it right before or right after a magic moment. Try to come up with a timing where it happens on the offbeat.]

While We Were Out

So what’s happened the past 10 days?

Well, the new season of Fool Us started airing. Here’s the description of the first episode from TVGuide.com.

Screen_Shot_2020-06-22_at_5.37.07_PM.png

I didn’t see the episode, but I really hope these plucky, young “aspiring magicians” did well. But even if not, don’t give up! I have faith in you. Never stop aspiring to be a magician. I know it’s hard. Paul Gertner, for example, has been trying to be a magician for, like, 40 years. Everyone in his life is telling him to give it up and come back and work for the family cabinet-making business. But I think he should follow his dreams. Maybe one day he’ll get a break and finally be a real magician.


A new trick was released where a deck of cards turns into a stack of money.

There was a concern by some, after looking at the demo, that people might notice the 90 degree corners on the cards or the space between the cards.

I sent an edited version of the demo along to the Virtual Focus Group to see if any of them brought up these issues themselves. Nobody (of the 14 people who responded) commented on the corners of the deck or any weirdness in the space between the cards. Four of them said the money didn’t look quite right. And almost all of them said they would only really be convinced of the trick if they could look at the money at the end. Of course, you can’t let them look at the money so this trick is useless in casual situations and probably unconvincing in a more formal setting.

Visually I think it’s an okay trick. I just don’t see anyone seeing it and saying, “He turned a deck of cards into money!” I see them saying, “He had what looked like a deck of cards and changed it into what looked like money.” That’s still somewhat interesting. But that’s the sort of thing that’s going to get you a “that’s clever” reaction rather than a reaction where people are truly awed.


I don’t like to tease you too much with anything, but while we were away, I think I may have invented one of the greatest card tricks of all time.

It’s a prediction trick that uses a borrowed, shuffled (even incomplete) deck. You never touch the cards. And the spectator makes the prediction.

I need to try it out more to really get it in shape, but if it works like I imagine it will, I will release it in some form in the future.. And if it doesn’t work, I’ll still describe what I had in mind in a post here and you’ll understand why I’m excited about it.


In the just-released July issue of the newsletter for supporters, I wrote:

“You could teach the dullest moron or a robot (or the offspring of those two things: Joshua Jay) to perform the Invisible Deck and it would still fool people.”

It took just 45 minutes before someone wrote me asking why I don’t like Joshua Jay.

So it’s time for my annual reminder that I actually do like Josh. I think he’s a great performer and teacher, and he’s always been a friend and supporter of my work, going back to the site I had in the early 2000s. In Josh I have the opportunity to talk shit about someone, which I enjoy doing, without that person getting all worked up about it.

So let me clarify again: I like Josh both personally and professionally. I’m a big fan of everything he does. He’s a good guy with a good sense of humor about himself. I have no ill-will towards him at all.


Hey, speaking of that douchebag, Joshua Jay. Did you guys get that email from Vanishing Inc yesterday? What’s the deal with that picture? Is it an angle thing or…

Screen Shot 2020-06-30 at 7.25.24 PM.png

It doesn’t look like Josh missed leg day. It looks like he missed leg year. What the hell. I realize gyms are closed due to Covid-19, but he couldn’t manage to pop out a few bodyweight squats in the past three months? Has he been walking on his hands everywhere? When you’re standing next to Andi Gladwin, of all peopleproud cover-boy of niche porn magazine, “Pasty Weakling Weekly”—and he looks sturdier and more robust than you in the lower body, it’s time to take a good hard look in the mirror.

No, Josh. That’s not a mirror. That’s a box of Double Pops.

cherrypopsicle.jpg

Until July...

It’s the end of the June posting cycle and thus time to say goodbye for a little bit.


It’s also the summer solstice. Always a good day to show someone some magic because, of course, it’s the day when the earth absorbs the most electromagnetic radiation from the sun and you can harness that in order to… well, do whatever you want, really.


Things are gradually opening up around me. Friends are making plans to get together and more performing opportunities are coming back day after day. And people seem desperate for interaction. it’s a good time to have something to show people. Don’t miss it.

It’s also a good opportunity to shift your style of performing. If you’ve felt stuck in the rut of doing boring ass card tricks for people, now is a good opportunity to say, “No, actually I didn’t learn many new card tricks during quarantine. I sort of took a break from that. Instead I was looking into some other stuff. It’s kind of magic related but a little… weirder.”


I’m shifting heavily into the writing of book number four at the moment. The last couple of months involved a lot of prepping and outlining, but the real writing starts over the summer.

Book number four! Holy shit. Someone wrote me a little while ago and did the math and estimated that between the site, the books, the magazine, and the newsletters, I have written the equivalent of 24 full-length books since the start of this site. I mean, I get that the writing one does for a blog is different than the writing one does for a book. But still. That’s a lot of writing about magic. Especially given the fact that I hate writing, and I only barely like magic.


See you in July.

I’ll leave you with what I consider a summer music classic. It’s Summertime Clothes by Animal Collective. It’s a rare song that romanticizes being hot and uncomfortable on a summer night. I’m not sure I’d love it as much as I do if it wasn’t so nostalgic for me. It’s about ditching your bed on a hot night to meet up with someone.

I’ve always been a big late-night frolicker. Starting as an 11 or 12 year-old, climbing out of my bedroom window to meet up with my friends—a bunch of sneaky little shadows, prowling the suburbs. Then as a teenager, sneaking out to meet up with my girlfriend for a moonlight walk or driveway make-out session. And up until now, as a grown-ass man, I still like getting together with people for late-night conversations, meals, or unsanctioned swims in my apartment complex’s pool.

So this song that really speaks to me. Great song. Great lyrics.

Second Helpings #1

Second Helpings is a new feature on the site that I introduced in this post. The idea is that people who have a book, ebook, or multi-item video release can offer up what they consider to be the second best item in their release to be posted here. They get the word out about their product and you get something for free. It’s a win/win.

Theoretically, if you enjoy what you get for free, then you will be inspired to purchase their release because, at the very least, there should be one thing even better, and hopefully a number of other things of a similar quality.

This series is specifically not intended to be for reviews of books and ebooks. As I said in the earlier post, writing a book review isn’t fun. it’s homework. But this series will give you what you need to generate your own review. You have a sample of the book. And you know the relative strength of that sample compared to other stuff in the book. You can do the math from there for yourself.

In this initial installment, we have three offerings.

We start with something from Allan Kronzek’s book Artful Deceptions. The effect is called True Romance, and here is how it’s described in the book…

This is a human-centric reimagining of Karl Fulves’ “Gemini Twins” from More Self-Working Card Tricks (1984). In all versions with which I am familiar, the spectators deal through the deck in order to find the mates of playing cards, or to match a prediction, or to find the four Aces. The effect has no emotional resonance because it’s about the cards, not the people. In this staging, a couple is invited to face each other, to look into each other’s eyes and to discover the precise moment when synchronicity, or intuition, or some deep, soulful connection allows them to miraculously discover each other’s selected cards. The ensuing level of astonishment is as deep as it is gratifying.

I haven’t used Allan’s exact handling, but I’ve done something similar with Gemini Twins and it can be very strong.

Here is the effect.

And here you can find more information about Allan’s book of “impromptu card mysteries” and see some of the great reviews it has received. (Although it should be noted, a couple of things in the book aren’t impromptu, so I’m not sure why he refers to the book that way. What other lies is he telling with his books? Does he even have grandkids or is he an involuntary celibate?)


Next up we have something from someone with the terrible pseudonym of Mere Practice. I tried to talk him out of it, but that’s what he’s going with.

Here, let me find him a better pseudonym. I’ll use this site that creates random usernames. Whatever it shits out can’t be worse than Mere Practice.

Let’s see…

Screen Shot 2020-06-18 at 10.10.26 PM.png

Oh, fuck yes! Pumpkins Summer? Bus Sponge? Pinwheel Slack? Those are all outstanding. Cookies Alphonse! “Good afternoon. I’m Cookies. Cookies Alphonse.” That would make a great name for a detective who doesn’t play by the rules in a 70s blaxploitation flick. “Aw shit, man! We gotta get out of here. Cookie Alphonse is coming!”

Annyyywayyysss…“Mere” is offering a one-handed turnover pass that he cleverly calls, One Handed Turnover Pass.

This is a pass that you would do with one hand while gesturing. The closest thing I do to a pass is “step outside the room and cut the deck,” so I have no clue if this is any good or not, but I feel it looks pretty good.

5SecondsApp_614221981.667041.gif

It’s a little hard to tell in that gif because the bottom card changes from the four of diamonds to the four of hearts, but there was a pass done there.

If it’s your sort of thing, you can check it out here.

Mere Practice’s book Casual (Looking) Magic can be found on Amazon.

It has taken the top spot in my rankings of “most depressing magic book covers.” The feeling it elicits isn’t one of magic and mystery so much as one of suicidal ennui.

Screen Shot 2020-06-18 at 9.39.00 PM.png

Coincidentally enough, the previous top spot was held by the gentleman at the top of today’s post, Allen Kronzek (although we really have Dover Publishing to blame). As mentioned in this post.


And finally we have an effect called Lucky You from Michal Kociolek’s book Plots and Methods. Here is the effect as described in the book:

A chosen card is found at a position established by randomly chosen numbers.

Ooohhh… what a scintillating description!

Actually it’s pretty strong effect. I have my own presentation that I’ve been working on for this, but that probably won’t see the light of day for a while now so check out the original version here.

The full book can be purchased here.


Thanks to Allan, Mere, and Michal for sharing their work.

If you’d like to offer up something from your book or download in a future installment of Second Helpings, just send me an email.

Mailbag #25

giphy.gif

I have this idea of combining two tricks, one you don't really like and one I'm not sure how you feel about.

BRANDED by Tim Trono + Kolossal Killer by Kenton Knepper

so the idea is quite simple, if you have a custom made BRANDED gimmick that has: the suits on one side (like the original) and the number 3 - 6 and Q on the other side, you can brand 16 different cards. The 6 and 9 being the same basic shape.

and adding the off by one you can cover the 48 cards, like KK. you get this, not sure why I'm writing it down.

The "off by one" can be basically placed anywhere. My initial idea was to write it in the same hand in which you "brand" the fingers, and just keep the hand closed if you don't need it and open it as a "tada" moment if you do need it.

Another idea was to make the Branded gimmick easy to release from the lighter and place a sticker or just sharpie in "off by one " on the lighter. You could take the lighter gimmick out, brand the fingers, hand the lighter- gimmick to the spectator and they hold the lighter while you burn your fingers.

The whole point was just an idea to carry only 1 object for this without doing the pocket index like third degree burn.

I'm aware this is more clever than strong. But just wanted to share with you the idea. —DM

Yes, it’s a clever idea. But my issue with it is—while the tricks work together methodologically—I don’t think they make a cohesive performance piece. The blister trick (and its variations) is a very organic/elemental trick, but the “off by one” part of KK is a sort of “cerebral” revelation. “My prediction was off… but I predicted my prediction would be off.” The two tricks don’t really mesh well, in that respect.

It would sort of be like doing a stigmata effect where you make your hands bleed, and then asking the spectator if they know what word you’re thinking of and when they say, “No,” you open up your hand and show the blood has written out “NO.” Yes, you could do it, but I don’t think those things really go together.


You mentioned having dry hands in the past. What’s your current solution to deal with this? —ER

I have a feeling there is no one solution that works for everyone, I’m sure it has something to do with your own personal chemistry. So take that into consideration. What I’m currently using is O’Keeffes Working Hands cream. It gives me a few minutes of better grip/tackiness. And that’s generally all I need for my purposes (intermediate sleight-of-hand and/or jacking off).


One difference between performing magicians and amateur/social magicians is that the former usually have a stage personality. And if you are The One And Only El Magico, I think it is perfectly fine to take the "look how powerful I am" approach. But if you are uncle Harry, the guy from the Spanish evening class or just a friend, your approach is much more natural.

Do you think you have some sort of "stage personality" when doing social magic? If you do, I bet there is some sort of smear effect between this personality and your everyday just-Andy-and.nothing-magical personality. But maybe you don't change personality at all when doing magic. —AS

My goal is to have no performing “persona.” Occasionally I will play dumb during a magic trick for laughs, but occasionally I play dumb in real life for laughs, so that’s still congruent with who I am.

I don’t want my spectators to recognize a shift in personality when I go into a trick. I want them to recognize it’s a trick (maybe not immediately, but at some point) due to the subject matter and the strange thing that is happening. But I want them to feel like they’re going through this experience with me, the person they know and care for, not with Andy the Magnificent. That grounds the effect, even if it’s completely fantastical.

The feeling I’m striving for is that they’re the same person, and I’m the same person, but we’ve drifted into a different reality where weird shit happens.

This is sort of the underlying theme of the next book.