For Connecting

If you're an amateur magician who performs in casual situations, then this post is one of those "price of the subscription" ideas. What? There is no subscription price? I'm writing this for free? Well... that just means it's really easy for this to clear the bar of being worth the "price of the subscription." In fact, in that case, all my ideas are worth that price no matter how dumb they are. Like... let me think of something truly dumb... Okay, go to this etsy store and get the guy to engrave a playing card into one side of one of his spanking paddles. Then, when you're with your sex slave, show the paddle to him/her and show that it's normal on both sides (via the paddle move). Then smack their fat-ass with it leaving an impression of a card. Then later force that card on them and reveal it on their own bare ass. As they say, magic that happens on the spectator's own ass is the strongest magic you can perform.

In all seriousness, what comes next is one of the more powerful concepts I've come up with in regards to magic (although I would not be surprised at all if it has been explored by other people as well). The ideas is this: To increase the power of a prediction effect, remove the prediction from the effect. Or, more broadly: To increase the power of your magic, remove yourself from the magic.

A few years ago, one of the other Andys who helps out on this site created an effect where he could predict the outcome of a game of Connect Four. (The link is just in case Connect Four isn't the universal game I assume it to be.)

Now, because I like thinking about magic in a certain way and I love testing different approaches, I asked him to try it out in the following ways:

Approach No. 1 - Say to the spectator before the effect, "I want to play a quick game of Connect Four with you. In this envelope I've made a prediction, it's a drawing of how this game will end. You can play however you want, the only thing I ask is that you try to win the game, don't just let me beat you." And after the game you reveal the prediction

Approach No. 2 - Just play the game of Connect Four with no preamble. Then, when it's over say, "Before the game I made a prediction. It's a drawing of how the game would end." Then you direct the person to open the envelope and reveal your prediction.

Which do you think would work better? Well, he didn't do 100s of trials, just a few each way and he felt like there wasn't much difference in reaction between the two. But ultimately he decided approach number 1 was better. He felt the tension that built during the game made the whole thing more exciting. That makes sense, I think.

Then, as we were sitting around, another friend said, "What if you didn't predict the result of the game at all? What if the game ended and then you go to put it away and you see the game played out identically to the cover of the Connect Four box."

This should have been my idea, because it's similar to some other things I've worked on, but it wasn't. But all of us who were present immediately thought it was the best way to go and we encouraged Andy to try it out soon and report back to us. What do you think the response was? Well, it was significantly stronger than when the trick was a prediction. It wasn't just a strong moment of magic. Instead it was a strong moment of magic that continued to reverberate as the night went on. People didn't want to drop the checkers out of the game, they wanted to freeze the moment in time. They would take pictures of it. They'd post photos on facebook and instagram with them holding the box up next to the actual game, their mouth wide open to express their stupefaction. And hours after the game, they would stop whatever they were doing and shake their head and be like, "I still can't believe that happened."

Taking yourself out of the magic is something I'm a big proponent of. In fact, that may be the heart of my style. (Either not taking credit OR claiming to have done something so unbelievable that it's clear you aren't intending to get actual credit for it.) This is a subject that is part of a lot of the projects I'm currently working on. There are a number of effects in the forthcoming Jerx Book that are about removing the predictions and the magician's fingerprints from the effect; part of The Amateur At The Kitchen Table focuses on eliminating the feeling of a performance by not taking the role of a performer; and in one of the future posts in Project: Slay Them, I'll be writing about how getting back into showing people magic is much easier when you're not demonstrating some supposed "power" but just creating moments where something amazing happens (without you taking credit for it).

I started down this path when I realized that many of my favorite effects to perform were prediction effects. And even if you're using different objects, the effects can feel the same to the spectator, i.e. they make a lot of free or random choices or actions and in the end you've predicted the outcome of those choices and actions. Getting rid of the predictions in prediction effects will make them feel like something else entirely. They can be examples of incredible coincidences, fate, or luck. They can be echoes of something that has come before. They can indicate the guiding force of some higher power or some entity on another spiritual plane. There are dozens of ways to spin a typical prediction to remove yourself from the equation.

You might be thinking: But I want the credit. I don't want to remove myself and my "power" from the equation. I want them to think it was me who did something incredible. Really? Do you? I'm not talking to the professional performer, they have different concerns than an amateur (although I think there is merit in this style of presentation for professionals as well). If your goal is to entertain or amuse or enchant someone then you have to think how you want to approach a performance. If someone watches you do something for 5 minutes do you want them to leave having an experience that made you look incredible or having an experience that made their world seem more incredible? Which do you think will stick with them more?

You might think this is all a waste of time to think about because most people will know it's a trick regardless of your presentation. And yes, this is true. But that is not a strike against this style of presentation. In fact, it is its greatest strength. Here's why: No matter how you present an effect, you will have believers and non-believers in what you say. The vast majority are probably non-believers. And when you make a prediction or say you have some amazing power, then the non-believers will be taking credit away from you. "You didn't really predict this poker hand." "You didn't really read my mind." But if you don't claim responsibility, then the non-believers will be giving you credit. And the more you deny it, the more credit they will give you. "He says he had nothing to do with this... but he must have." And even if, in these two scenarios, the non-believers are arriving at the same destination, the direction they come from makes all the difference. [If I tell you, "You won a billion dollars in the powerball lottery," and then come back and say, "My mistake. You won $40," you're devastated. But if I say, "You lost the lottery drawing." And then come back and say, "My bad, you actually won $40." Then you're like, "Cool! Let's order a pizza."] So even if your goal is to get credit, I think you'll get more by not taking it.

Beyond that, I've found people are just more likely to play along with things when you don't claim to be the prime-mover behind the effect. And why wouldn't they? What's in it for them to deny this amazing experience that just happened? On the other hand, when you say, "I'm reading your mind," or, "I can use my mental powers to predict what cards you'll select," it makes complete sense that very few people are on board. And then magic message boards are filled with people saying, "Why do they see magic as a puzzle? Why don't they believe in my mental abilities? Why do they heckle me? Why do they try and expose the trick?" Hmm... yes... what a shock that people don't want to play along with your narcissistic fantasies about powers you don't possess. 


For Christmas I got my friend, Andy, this yellow polo shirt from Original Penguin.

He was kind of confused until he opened the second present from me with this updated Connect Four packaging.

Now, right when he's about to win, he gives a big fist pump and as he goes to drop his last checker in he pauses and says, "Oh my god," and stares directly at the game box and waits for his opponent to put it all together. The game matches, the shirt matches, the fist pump matches and eventually his opponent will slap her palm against her face like the girl on the box as well. If you don't think that this is more fun, entertaining and, yes, magical than saying, "Before the show I made a prediction..." then we're occupying different worlds. I hope you at least liked my ass-paddling card-revelation.

A Magician in Barnes and Noble

Today I went to Barnes and Noble. 

I don't know about the rest of the world, but coloring books for adults are a big thing in the US these days because... well... I haven't the foggiest fucking idea why, they just are. People say they are relaxing and meditative which I guess makes sense. But take up knitting and at least you'll end up with a scarf when you're done. 

Now that I think of it, I bet this is the reason why a lot of us will sit with a book of card magic working through tricks we have no intention of ever performing for people. Thinking of it that way makes it feel a little less masturbatory, but all the same, I think if you're the type of person who practices and never performs you kind of owe it to yourself to actually give someone the experience of the effect. But whatever, that's a talk for a different day.

I think there's a market for the Magic Coloring Book effect for adults now. In fact, I would probably go all the way and use one of the ones with a truly adult theme like this one

Whoops, my bad. That last one is actually from the Donny and Marie Coloring Book from the 70s.

Anyway, I'd come out with my new adult coloring book and flip through the uncolored pages. Then I'd furrow my brow and get all upset like, "This is going to take me forever to get these to the point where I could jerk-off to these images." Then I'd pull out the Abracadildo and tap the book and show the pages were now all colored in. Then I'd hand the coloring book to someone and ask them to open it to any page and they'd find the book was stuck shut. Kind of like Paul Harris' Solid Deception, except with an adult coloring book and ejaculate.


I thought this was going to be a Steve Brooks action figure.


Oooohh-ho-ho!!! Man, I can't wait to find out what juicy secrets this book contains. This is going to be so crazy. Oh, I bet there's some stuff about his anti-semitism... maybe he has secret anti-semitic messages hidden in the park or something? What could these exciting secrets be?

OH MY GOD!!!! I never thought it would be something that provocative! This is crazy! If you have Disney stock I would dump that shit because that's going to be worthless once dirty little secrets like these get revealed.


My one purchase was the Taschen magic book which was in the discount section for $20. If you don't have it and there's a Barnes and Noble near you, go track it down. It's beautiful and inspiring and one of those things you can have around your house that many of your guests will take an interest in and it provides a natural segue into performing (if you so choose).

And I can't wait until Taschen puts together their book on magic from the 1950s to the present day. I'm really hoping they get in touch with me to write it. I would love to be able to describe the stunning and romantic visual images of modern magic.



Magic Diddlers

Hey there.

Do you know of any magicians who were convicted of a sex crime? If so, can you send me a link to an article or a police report with the details of their crime? It's for something I'm working on.

Uhm...Andy...I have no idea what this is about, but whatever it is, it sounds like an incredibly bad idea.

I know!!! 

So pass them along if you know of any. I know Bob Markwood and Jim Pace, of course. 

And don't send me anyone who was is only technically a sex criminal. Like they got caught for public urination or they were 18 and had a 16-year old girlfriend. I want the good ones. Well... maybe good isn't the word I'm looking for in this context. What I mean is, I want the legit creeps. 

Popping Cherries 2: The Secret of the Ooze

My loves, I want you to know that even when I'm not posting here regularly, I'm still with you in spirit. I'm like Jesus because when there's one set of footprints in the sand that's when I carried you. Or I just completely checked out of your bullshit and hit the waves.

I'm also like Jesus because FUCK YOU, FIG TREE!

Even though there was a ten-year gap between my magic blogs, I want you to know that I never gave up on working on the problems I identified back then such as the one that follows. To understand that issue, let's flash back to the original post on my Magic Circle Jerk blog...

Thursday, September 23, 2004

Popping Cherries 

I read an effect once and the effect required you to do a bit of fishing in order to figure out which card a spectator was thinking of. At one point in the effect you had to ask, "Was it a cherry-colored card?" And I've seen people use this line at least a couple of times in my life. In the effect I was reading it said that women will most often think of red cards so this is a pretty safe line if used on a woman, and if she didn't think of a red card there is an "out." The "out" is that you say, "Well, there are black cherries." 

Now, it's one thing if you consider that a joke (I don't, because I think jokes should be funny), but is it in any way an out? An "out" implies something subtle that makes something (a prediction or a statement) that is incorrect seem correct. But there's no way that cherry-colored shit could be considered an out in my mind. Why not just say this: Someone chooses a card and you say, "Was it a red card?" If they say "no," your out is "Well, then it was a black card." That's just as clever an out as the "black cherries" thing.

I let this issue marinate in the back of my mind for over ten years, but now I've completely solved the problem. I've created a way to discern what color card the spectator is thinking of with a statement that will always seem like a "hit" to the spectator.

Here's how it works. 

Step One: You need to stop using cards where the suits are red and black. You need to use cards where the suits are brown and pink. 

I will be selling these cards for $11.50 a deck. I assume they will become the standard cards used by all magicians after they read this post.

Step Two: If you are an American, travel to England. If you're British, travel to America. You may just want to go ahead and move to the other country in order to use this gambit as frequently as possible. If you're already an ex-pat, then you're all set. If you don't live in either of those countries, establish residence in one of them, then, after a few years, move to the other. 

Step Three: When you need to narrow down which color card your spectator picked, just put your hand to your temple and say:

"My psychic powers tell me that you picked a fanny colored card."

They will either say, "Yes! How ever did you know that!" or they will say, "No." If they say no you just say, "But I'm sure of it! Ah, I know, the problem. Where I'm from, 'Fanny' means..." etc, etc.

For those of you who aren't from either one of those countries, or just don't follow, here is the quirk of American/British English that we are taking advantage of...

Problem solved. Next!

White Nocturne

Imagine

You're out for a walk in the woods on a snowy evening with a friend. She comments on how beautiful the snow is in the moonlight. "Want to see something crazy?" you ask. You tell her to scoop up some snow and place it in your empty, cupped hands where you form it into a ball. Your hands are legitimately empty except for the snowball. You ask her to concentrate on the snowball, or send positive thoughts into the snowball, or imagine the captured moonlight within the snow covering this field, or whatever your thing is. Soon the snow starts glowing bright white, like a little lamp illuminating the two of you. After a few moments you squeeze the snowball and it crumbles to the ground, the light vanishing as it goes. You take her hand and continue down the wooded path.

Method

Just by describing this effect, I have probably given the method away to most of you. So the only thing to say is, yes, it works, and it actually looks better than you think it might.

You've probably put all the pieces together already, but if not, here are the steps.

You need a white D'lite in your pocket where you can get to it easily.

Ask your friend to pick up some snow and dump it in your cupped hands. If you're wearing gloves or mittens, take them off and put them in your pocket, stealing away the D'lite as you do. If not, just grab the D'lite as your friend picks up the snow.

She dumps the snow in what appears to be your empty cupped hands.

In reality, this is what is going on. (This photo is from below, looking up at my hands.)

The D'lite is just hanging out on your ring or pinky finger.

You curl your fingers in and form the snowball around the D'lite and pack it tight. 

Now you can show the snowball very fairly in your otherwise clearly empty hands.

Their perspective:

Your perspective:

Ask them to cup their hands and place the snowball in their hands with the gimmick facing down for a moment while you rub your hands together briskly as if to warm them up. This is all to reinforce two things: It's just a snowball and there is nothing else in your hands. 

Take the snowball back and grip it with both hands, sliding your thumb into the D'lite. After a few moments let it light up. Keep it lit and show it as freely as you can. After a while crush the snowball and "turn off" the D'lite in the process.

You can see what this looks like on the video below. (I had to go inside because it looks much better in a darker environment and the sun wasn't going to set for a couple more hours and I was freezing my balls off.)

Yes, you could use a colored D'lite and make the snowball glow red (or have a bunch of different colors on you and make it glow "any" named color), but I prefer the organic look of the white glow. I also prefer a white light because, to my mind, a red glow needs to be justified in some way in your presentation, whereas a white glow just feels like you've intensified a trait the snow already possessed and I don't think it requires justification or patter or anything. It's the type of visual moment a spectator can just read into and interpret for themselves. 

Actually, Never Mind

Regarding the last few posts, if you're the type of person who can't read intent and tone in writing, you are never going to be able to come off as the type of person who can read the intricacies of someone's thoughts. For your sake, you should absolutely stick to telling a person which hand they hold a coin in. That's definitely your speed. In fact, that might be a bit too recklessly electrifying an effect for you. How about something like this: You ask them to hide a coin in one of their hands, then you say, "My psychic power tells me you're holding a coin in one of your hands." Your spectator will be impressed that you knew they didn't drop the coin or put it in their mouth or something. Then retire to the drawing room for cucumber sandwiches so everyone can compose themselves after all the excitement.


In other news, hey all you virgins out there, I hope you aren't too attached to your hymens because they's about to get busted like a can of biscuits. Look what I just got as a belated Christmas gift...

Friend of the site, Stacy Smith, who helped me track down the plastic wine-bottle, tipped me off to this set as well. (She asked me to make it clear that she's a lady. A lady whose taste in magic kits can be just as questionable as any man's. You go girl!) We'll get to both sets eventually, but the wine bottle is more about seduction so that will come later. (Once I've used this set to chat them up, I'll use that one to seal the deal.) Look for those posts later this winter.

I'm bringing it up now because I know a lot of you have daughters and if they're post-pubescent you're going to want to keep a close eye on them in the coming months because I'm going to be out slaying poon-tang with these magic kits and you never know where I'll be unless you follow the trail of soaked panties I leave in my wake like some fucked-up Hansel and Gretel.


Okay... now do I need to point out I'm kidding in that last section? Is that what this site has become? I think it would be wildly insulting to your intelligence if I were to do so. But what do I know. People thought I was genuinely suggesting you use this patter for the coin-in hand effect:

"Is the coin in your right hand? Okay. Have you cheated on your wife?"

Apparently, neither context clues nor common sense could sway them that his was anything other than a legit suggestion.

For all I know someone is out there now writing furiously, "This guy is going to use magic kits to seduce virgins! It's not funny. It's going to destroy lives! And all for what? So this guy can play peek-a-boo with his vein cane in the honey-pot? WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!"

I am joking. I'm not serious. The whole concept behind these magic kits is ridiculous but I'm acting like I completely buy into them. Understand? And the humor comes from me committing 100% to the idea that these kits will get you laid. It's exaggeration for humorous effect, a fundamental element of comedy. As fundamental as the juxtaposition of two extremely dissimilar things. Like the statement, "Is the coin in your right hand," and the statement, "Have you cheated on your wife." Two things that are so incongruous that you actually could say them in a real performance because it would be seen as broadly comic to conflate the two sentences. 

What is that noise? Oh, it's the EKG machine announcing the death of my soul from having to explain jokes. No more. Either keep up or take a hike. Go watch a youtube video of someone doing that trick where they confuse a banana with a bandana. That's probably more your scene.

Gardyloo #2

First I want to wrap up on the discussion of the "coin in hand" or "liar/truth-teller" plot from the past two posts. As I said in my original post, this is far and away the least interesting way of demonstrating your ability to detect lies or read body language. This isn't my opinion, it's just scientific fact. It's the least amount of variables and the "truth" we're trying to establish (which hand holds a coin) could not be less personal or more arbitrary. 

That's not to say that strong routines can't evolve from this premise, I think they can. I think the trick in my last post is very strong. Colin McLeod also has a version of this effect that I believe is called Perfect Prediction, as demonstrated in his Penguin lecture. His version makes it more than a 50/50 effect about the location of a coin. It's a way of predicting essentially anything. When I first played around with it I would email or text the picture below to a friend and before they would look at it I would perform the trick where they would "freely" end up thinking about Oprah skateboarding in front of the leaning tower of Pisa and yelling "Fiddlesticks." Then they would open the text or email to see that it was predicted beforehand. Just as a "proof of concept," the effect worked very well and I've since come up with a couple other variations on his trick that are even stronger for my purposes. So if you're interested in this plot, check out his version. To be completely upfront, his effect uses Hugo Shelley's Sixth Sense gimmick which is $300 (and sold out in most places) so that's probably a consideration. Although it does allow you to do this clever joke, "Which hand is the coin in? Not mine. Because I spent all my money on the Sixth Sense gimmick." Which is a gag laymen will love.

I think the only good impromptu version of this effect -- the only one that doesn't feel like you're reading a page from MindWare - Perplexors: Level A - 48 Logic Puzzles - Great for Helping With Standardized Tests - Challenging and Rewarding - For Grades 3-4 -- is Tequila Hustler by Mark Elsdon. It's the least clunky and you can do it with a number of people at the same time. I would recommend not asking yes or no questions as I mentioned in last Thursday's post. Just let people make statements in accordance with their roles. I think this causes less fuck-ups and it's more interesting for those watching to see if they can determine who's lying and who isn't when they're talking in full sentences, not just saying "yes" or "no."

And finally, I think you really do have to mention why you're trying to figure out something so dull in this effect. The two ways I would go about it is to say that discerning lies is easier the more emotionally significant the subject matter is, so I'm going to challenge myself by trying to figure out who's lying about the most inconsequential things possible: what hand is holding a coin. Or you could use the coin effect as something of a "baseline" reading before transitioning into a subject that is more interesting/relevant. This is similar to the way in which at the beginning of a lie detector test they'll ask you what your name is and to verify the day of the week. These questions establish your responses in low-stress situations. You could do something like, "Is the coin in your right hand? Okay. Have you cheated on your wife?" 


I'm still not quite sure what the posting schedule will be like here for the beginning part of this year. This isn't just me being lazy, I just have to prioritize the writing work I'm involved in which includes these projects:

  1. Any freelance work I'm being paid for.
  2. Writing the Jerx book that comes out later this year.
  3. Writing X-Communication, the monthly review newsletter that goes out to the people who pre-ordered the book during the initial donation period (and those who do a monthly donation via paypal).
  4. Re-writing Amateur at the Kitchen Table, a long essay that will eventually be a small booklet that covers all the aspects of performing in casual/non-professional situations. This will also be going to the people who ordered The Jerx book in the initial donation period and will be available separately as well. 
  5. Then writing posts for this site. 

I'm going to try and keep the posting here pretty regular (at least a few times a week), but just letting you know the other things I have on my plate.


My friend and frequent creative collaborator, Stasia Burrington, painted this amazing Ouija board for me.

It features a death's-head hawkmoth and black hellebore flowers. Stasia is a great person to collaborate with because, while she has her own distinct style, she's fully capable of -- and happy to -- create things in other styles as well.  And I'm pretty thrilled to say that she will be doing the illustrations for The Jerx Book.

Check out some more of her work below...