Young Reckless Hearts

This post is about the approach I'm taking to performing magic and why I'm performing it the way I do these days. It's going to be a little rambly because the ideas are a little rambly in my head.


I reached out to an old school friend, Kathy, and suggested we meet up as I would be back in our hometown for and extended period over the holidays. While we had exchanged a couple messages over social media, we hadn't seen each other since high school.

We met up for dinner a couple weeks before Christmas at the thai food restaurant owned by another school friend's parents. She looked amazing in a festive red sweater-dress and I told her so.

"You look great too," she said.

"Yeah, no shit," I said, picking up with the witty banter from where I left it when we were 17.

Over dinner she asked if I still did magic. 

"Every now and then," I said. "Actually, maybe I can try something with you later."

After dinner we sat in my car talking. At one point she takes the deck of cards out of the cup-holder in the console between us and says, "Show me something." 

I have her pick a card, give her the chance to change her mind if she doesn't like it. She ends up with the four of diamonds. I have her tear off the corner, then I have her sign the card and initial the torn corner and put it in her purse.

We step out of my car and walk around the back towards the trunk. With a lighter I burn her card (as much as possible) and let the ash and charred pieces drop on my trunk in a little pile. 

"Watch," I say, as I cover the pile of destroyed card with my hand. After a few moments I lift my hand. Nothing has happened. "One more try," I say, and cover the pile again. I let a little more time pass than before and raise my hand again. Still nothing. Just a pile of ash and burnt card. "What the crap?" I mumble. "Screw that. I can't make it work," I say.

"You used to be good," she says.

A half hour later, as we sit in her car talking, outside our old high school, I say, "You know what we have to do tonight, yes?"

She squints at me as if to say, "You know I'm married, right?" But with just enough of a smile to suggest, "But it's a pretty loveless arrangement and I could maybe be talked into something."

"It's been 30 years. We have to dig up our time capsule," I say.

"When did we bury a time capsule?" she asks. 

"30 years ago. Just like I just said."

She (understandably) claims to have no memory of this. But who remembers all the stuff you did as a little kid? "I would never have thought of it either," I say, "but I found an old note I made to myself about opening it in 30 years and that jogged my memory. I have no clue what's in there."

We drive to my parent's place and pick up a shovel and then walk a quarter mile to the creek that runs behind our housing development. There is a large tree stump at the top of what used to be our sledding hill. Somehow, in the intervening 30 years, the ground has leveled off to the point where it's almost flat. We're both fairly surprised by how the landscape can change so dramatically in what feels like a short period of time. 

I start to dig near the tree trunk where I remember burying the time capsule. After a few minutes with no luck I start rotating around the tree until my shovel strikes something. I ask her to grab it and she pulls out an old, rusted GI Joe lunchbox. (Like this one, but in significantly worse shape.)

We bring it back to my parent's house and open it up on the hood of my car, illuminated by the christmas lights and street lamp. A good amount of dirt has made its way into the lunchbox and we have to sift through it to find everything. There's a Madball. Some M.U.S.C.L.E. men. A can of New Coke. One of her slap bracelets and one of her barrettes with a plastic bow on it. An old dollar. A David Lee Roth cassette and some other little items. Then she removes a worn, sealed coin envelope with my faded scrawl on it.

For Kathy.
Don't open for 30 years.
(It won't make sense until then.)

"What is this?" she asks.

"I don't remember," I say. "Open it. Oh... I hope it's not a love letter or something."

She tears it open and removes an old, tattered and beat-up playing card. The four of diamonds, with a missing corner, and her name signed on it in ballpoint pen in her bubbly adolescent handwriting. 

We both look at each other.

"Get that other corner I say."

She grabs her purse and removes the corner from her wallet. The initialed corner from the new four of diamonds is a perfect tear-for-tear match with the just unearthed 30-year-old card.

"Shit. I really was good at this stuff." I say, scratching my head.


Here's enough of the method for you to figure out what's going on.

Reverse Psychology Force
Intercessor
1800 Deck (with some extra aging of the card via roughing it up a bit (an "old" card that is almost super smooth and new feeling is bizarre))
A forged signature based on her signed name in an old yearbook.

The slap bracelet and barrette were the only item that actually belonged to either of us as kids. I found them in a shoebox on a previous visit home and remembered taking them from her as a kid because I had a crush on her. 



A reader wrote late last year and said:

"Your writing made me examine what I'm putting out there when I perform and WHY I'm performing at all. And while I recognize there might be something awkward or unpleasant about trying to make it seem like I have some unique gifts, I don't really know what the alternative is."

I think a lot of people feel that way and so a lot of people just don't perform. 

There are people who want validation and want acclaim and think they can get that by doing magic tricks. I don't really agree with that, but it makes sense on some level. 

The problem is, some people "evolve" past this neediness and then feel like, "Well... why bother performing?" And so they'll read and practice and discuss concepts and theory with other magicians, but they won't actually utilize any of these things in the real world. Even the idea that they might use this knowledge to entertain others feels oddly narcissistic or desperate to these people. "Hello everyone! I have just what you need. A little bit of me to brighten your day!"

So if it's not for validation and it's not to entertain them, why do I perform? Why bother spending $50 on a bunch of old toys and burying them in the dead of winter?

You wanted to impress her.

That's not why.

You wanted to charm her. You wanted to hook up with this girl you used to have a crush on.

No. If charming her was the goal I wouldn't bother with a trick.

Then why?


Someone once told me I act like a teenager, and he intended it as an insult. But I was fine with that comment. I'm into teenagers.

Uhm, not in the creepy way.

And not in the pathetic way, like, "Hey brah, those kicks are on fleek."

In fact, it's probably fair to say I find most teenagers unbearable to be around, but there is an energy they possess that I admire. Teenagers, more than any other demographic, have a restless energy that pushes them to create and explore new experiences.

We associate a desire for new experiences with youth. If you see a 55 year old man and he says, "I'm going to get some friends and we're going to shoot a movie on our iphones," or, "I'm going to see if I can sled off the roof and into the pool," he seems like a youthful guy. Even if the new experience is something more "sophisticated"—if he says, "I'm going to divest my 401k and use the money to open a restaurant"—that feels like a youthful move. It doesn't seem "mature." 

I'm wary of the word "mature." It often seems like a euphemism for lazy.

I don't just think new experiences are appreciated more by the young, I think they help keep you young.

And I think amateur magic is uniquely suited to provide people with new experiences.


Lots of magicians say, "I don't want to just do a trick. I want to create an experience."

And then they sit back and do a trick. 

I'm not the first person to talk about creating an experience, I just might be the first one to mean it.

Seeing a card trick is an experience for the spectator.

Seeing two card tricks is still just one experience for the spectator.

We pull out a deck of cards and ask the person to select one and they say, "I've seen this one before." And we think to ourselves, "What a fucking idiot. He doesn't even know what I'm going to do." But for him it doesn't matter. It feels pretty much the same regardless. If your audience isn't specifically into magic, then more tricks can just be more of the same. You might wonder how a 4-ace trick can feel the same as Reset, but to some it can. All mariachi music sounds 100% identical to me. All classical ballets look the same. For some people, all card tricks are just cards going from here to there or changing to other cards.

But if you zoom out one level up from the tricks and focus on giving people new experiences you can eliminate this sameness.


This is why I harp so much on removing the performer from the effect.

The performer did this = I saw a performance

This thing occurred = I had an experience


I now think almost entirely in the context of "experience" and not trick. 

For example, with the "Peek Backstage" style, the actual trick is almost irrelevant. The interesting thing to the audience is the experience of seeing a work-in-progress by a magician and being part of the effect coming together.

If I want to go to a "haunted" location and float an object, it doesn't really matter what the object is or how it floats. It's about the experience of being in this house where a father wood-chipped his family and now something strange is happening. 

I could do the "Peek Backstage" card trick, and then float something at the "haunted" house and those would feel like two unique experiences to someone.

But if I just performed those tricks in my living room without a thought towards experience the spectator would think, "He showed me some tricks." It would just be one experience.

Is this making sense? 


But Andy, they ultimately know you do magic and that these things are tricks, so it's all the same regardless of how you try to differentiate them.

No. We're not that rational. If an experience feels different, then it is different.


But that would just be weird to try and spring this sort of thing on the people I know and have been performing for for years. It's more comfortable to ask them to see a trick than say, "Hey, let's drive a half hour from here to some old house where a guy murdered his family and see if something interesting will happen." 

I get that. The style of amateur magic I'm proposing on this site is definitely easier to get into with people you haven't performed for before than it is with people you already show tricks to on a regular basis. Those people are in a groove as much as you are. So maybe this is just something you adopt with new people going forward. Or maybe you make a joke out of the whole thing and that lets you transition styles in a more "meta" way. Maybe you make a big pronouncement to your wife, "That's IT! I'm not doing any more magic tricks. What a waste of time. I can't be horsing around with that type of foolishness anymore." Then ten seconds later, "Hey, sweetheart, could I get your help with a voodoo love ritual I'm trying? Rest assured it's NOT a magic trick. I don't do those anymore." I think you will find that even though she's seen 100s of your card tricks, and even though she knows this is just another card trick, and even though she understands you're just kidding around; framing it as a different experience will still trick her brain into taking more of an interest in it. 


So that is where my head is at, and that is my focus as we begin Jerx 2017. I'm not doing magic for validation or for people to think I'm clever. I'm not even doing it strictly to "entertain" people. I'm doing it to give people an interesting, novel experience. It's about creating memories. Memories are just new experiences in the past. No one ever says, "Ah yes, I remember the 6th time I fucked my wife." Unless something new happened that 6th time.

Thinking of magic in terms of the experience, rather than the trick, makes perfect sense. As I said, magic is uniquely suited to creating new experiences. The only artistic experience you can give someone if you play the violin is to play the violin for them. That's fine. But magic allows for the creation of any experience. 

It's not the sole way I perform. I still end up performing a few mindless card tricks around a coffee table for those who like that sort of thing. I certainly still like that sort of thing. But I think focusing on experience is the most rewarding way to perform (for me at least).

Some of you will get hung up on this because it requires you to invest more thought in the spectator's concerns than your own. It's easier just to do the tricks and be like, "take it or leave it." You're worried that if you perform in a way that suggests you care and put effort into it, that maybe you'll feel dumb if they don't care about it. Okay, that's valid. But it's also an awfully frightened way to go through life. But go ahead, never invest. Then you can lie on your deathbed and say, "I win! No one ever made me feel dumb for caring too much!"

Me? I invest. I invested time planning. I invested $50 bucks buying some old toys from the 80s off ebay. I invested energy burying a lunchbox around the icy roots of a tree stump and then doing my best to make the ground and snow seem undisturbed. But I get the payoff too. I get the memory of that night. The memory of tipsily stumbling through the snow to a place we shared a history as kids— sledding in the winter or capturing tadpoles amidst the cat-tails in the summer (I sound like Tom Sawyer). I get the memory of digging into the hard earth under December's full moon—the Full Cold Moon as the Farmer's Almanac calls it—and the shovel ting'ing off the lunchbox and the look on her face when she realized there was really something there. 

"This is the most insane night of my life," she said after matching up the new torn corner to the 30-year-old playing card with her childhood signature on it. "You just made my year," she said, radiating with energy.

New experiences make the world feel new. And when the world feels new, you feel young. Or, at the very least, you recognize that you're not dead yet.


I love music that evokes youth too. (Not music that young people like. They like shit.)

This post takes its name from this fuzzed-out power-pop song by Warm Soda, which has only garnered this one comment in the past couple years on youtube:

"goddamn, this is more teenage than i am (and i'm 15)"

Coming in the JAMM #1

One of the rules I tried to adhere to when I was writing the X-Communication newsletter was to not review something unless I had personally performed it (or at least seen it performed by someone else in real life). There were a few times where I couldn't—and sometimes where a trick was so fundamentally flawed I didn't need to do it—but for the most part I did and it always led to better reviews which were informed not just by my opinion of the trick/method, but my experience performing it. I will try to keep that up with the reviews in the JAMM as well, if for no other reason than that actually performing the effects makes it easier to write about them. And it often allows for the evolution of a presentation that is more in line with my style .

Late last year there was a really offbeat effect put on the market with a super clever gimmick behind it. After playing with it and performing it a few times (and getting really good reactions), I came up with an alternate presentation that has been getting even better reactions. You'll find my review and handling for the effect— which is in my top 3 of the year—in the JAMM #1.

You can subscribe to The JAMM here.

2016 Magic Awards

Least Essential Deck of Custom Playing Cards

Is Jay Leno your style icon? 

Then you have to get the Denim Deck. It's all the style of denim, with the luxury... of denim!

Great for your next corporate gig at Gitano, B.U.M. Equipment, or Bugle Boy, the Denim Deck is your way to let people know you have a shitty sense of esthetics without constantly having to verbalize it.


Best Gimmick That I Can't Really Figure Out A Use For

I love the gimmick for Hologram by David Stone. A sticker materializes on a card and then changes color.

Unfortunately I haven't really been able to come up with a context for it that is particularly logical. In David's routine he has a spectator choose a card and he puts a sticker on it. This card is lost in the deck. Then he brings another card out of his pocket, makes a sticker appear on it, but it's the wrong color, then he changes it to the right color and shows the card to be the spectator's card. It sort-of makes sense. But it doesn't make a ton of sense.

This is the downside of the style of magic I prefer. Normally magic is just meaningless nonsense and everyone is okay with that. But if you train your audience to expect some kind of logic to your effects, then they become a bunch of wise-asses when things don't really make sense. "Hmmm... so why did you put a sticker on the card? Because you had a way of making it look like a sticker appears on a card?"

To be fair, the DVD that came with this effect didn't work when I got it, so maybe there is a more cohesive plot to be found on there. I'm too lazy to send it back and find out.


Best $13 I Spent

I know there's nothing more boring than this, but I have a fetish for organization and storage and boxes and things like that. In that regard I've really enjoyed this little lock-box from Amazon.

It's the perfect size for a couple decks of cards, some Sharpies, and a handful of gimmicks. Velcro'd to the inside of the top of the box are two coin-purse-esque pouches. I travel a lot so I use this as kind of a magic dopp kit. I keep a few things I'm working on and a few mainstays of my repertoire in there and I can just grab it and go, instead of just having these things rattling around in my regular bag or something like that. Then when I go out at night I can peel off one of little pouches and toss it in my pocket and have a couple gimmicks on me if an opportunity should present itself.

Plus it has a lock on it so people won't know I'm not a true wizard. I can hide all my secrets away like a pre-teen with her diary.


Dumbest Post at the Magic Cafe

Always a stiff competition, but I think this may be my favorite.

So, imagine you release a watch that produces smoke. "Look, everyone! Smoke is naturally emanating from his skin, right from under his big ugly watch!" your audience enthuses. 

And then you make a version that looks like a smart watch. The only problem is that it doesn't tell time. What do you do when your spectator asks you what time it is?

Well, here is the creator's response...

Is that a normal human response to being asked what time it is?

"I'm not going to look at my watch (the thing I keep on my wrist for the purpose of telling time). I'm going to look at my phone to tell you what time it is. It's more accurate."

"Thanks! Obviously when I casually asked for the time I needed something hyper-accurate. You see, I'm timing how long it takes for an electron to jump from one atom to another. Can you let me know when 320 attoseconds have passed?"

Hey, dum-dum:

1. Smart watches and cellphones will generally display identical times.

2. There's already a built in reason for why you can't tell the time with a smart watch. No battery left. Don't overcomplicate it:

"The time!! You want to know what time it is?! Uhhh...uhh...hold on....uhm...[be cool, man]...uh....haha...sure, the time.... You know, I can't be turning my wrist back and forth all day. My mom has carpal tunnel. It runs in our family. I think I'll get my phone from my pocket. It's much more accurate anyway. Oh, actually I left it in the other room. Just a sec.

...

Just got to plug it in real quick. I forgot to charge it last night.

...

Oh, there we go. It's three-ish."

3. I agree it's probably unlikely that anyone will ask you the time. As you said, most people have cellphones. I do, however, think there's a very good chance someone will say. "Hey, let me see that ghetto smart watch you have there. What brand is that hunk of garbage?" This is why you don't put a smoke device in a watch that people may take any interest in whatsoever. (This should have been obvious with 2 seconds of thought.) 


Best Picture of David Blaine's Diarrhea

Coming in JAMM #1

The Word Processor of the Gods

This is based on an old idea from this site that I've fleshed out into a three-phase routine. It's essentially a multi-phase Triumph effect that includes a spectator shuffle. It's got a completely different energy than a standard Triumph effect. It's a very kinetic presentation where you and the spectator are bouncing between real life and your computer as you undo your actions in the real world, again and again, until you're undoing your own undoings. And, like all my best effects, it ends with you suggesting acts of sexual congress with your spectator.

You can subscribe to the Jerx Amateur Magic Monthly here.

With your paid subscription you will also receive a football phone. 

Scratch that, the football phone is a no-go. But with your paid subscription you will receive the first Jerx Deck of playing cards. The only way to obtain this deck is with a subscription to this site/the JAMM.

Welcome Back

Hey, it's me, magic's #1 fuccboi, Andy, returning for year 2(.5) of The Jerx. 

Today I'm going to ease back in to regular posting with a preview of what's in store for this year.

How are your New Year's resolutions going? One of mine was to be much more focused when writing this site. I wanted to be less distracted so posts wouldn't take me so long to put together. Usually when I write I'll write a sentence, take a break, think about what the next sentence will be, and in that break I'll click some other tabs and start doing something else entirely. So this year was going to be the year I knocked that shit off and really sat down and wrote with a single-mindedness. 

So I sat down. Thought: I guess I'll say 'Welcome back.' Then thought: Maybe I can find an amusing Welcome Back Kotter gif. Then I watched Welcome Back Kotter clips on youtube for 35 minutes—a show I consider unfunny and depressing.

So that's where I'm at.


This site exists because of the people who pledged their support for the Jerx 2017. If you signed up for the mailing list in the past couple of months you should have received an email this weekend with a link to subscribe for the supporter rewards to come. If you didn't sign up and you're interested, don't worry, the link will be available for everyone tomorrow.


This Christmas, reader Joseph Ruiz was inspired by some of the ideas in this blog to perform a Distracted Artist/non-presentation bottle production. Instead of saying, "Gather 'round everyone. As you know, I'm a mindfreak and I have something wonderful to show you," he just planted the folded, flattened bag he would remove the bottle from under the Christmas tree as part of a White Elephant gift exchange. When it was his turn to "randomly" pick a gift, he chose the little packet, unfolded it, pulled out a little card and then the bottle of booze.


Here is the schedule for the Jerx 2017:

Monday, Wednesday, and Friday there will be new posts here. 

Tuesday and Thursday there will be short posts previewing what will be in the coming month's Jerx magazine or highlighting some other commercial enterprise related to this site. Essentially these will be sponsored posts, except I'm the sponsor. (Although I'm open if other people want to purchase something ad-like to run on one of those days.)

So if you just want the legit posts, come on MWF. New posts will go up around 3AM New York time.

There will be the occasional Saturday non-magic posts, and I'll be taking 4 weeks off over the course of the year.

The first week of every month will be when the Jerx digital magazine will come out and that will go to all subscribers. It's full name is the Jerx Amateur Magic Monthly. I'm calling it that for two reasons. The first is because that is the perspective I'm writing from and any insights I have will be directed primarily to people performing in non-professional situations. The second reason is so that when it shows up in your email you can say, "Aw, shit! That's my JAMM!"

What will the difference be between the blog material and the magazine material?

In the magazine:

  • New product reviews and presentational ideas
  • Some of the (relatively) more workable effects I've come up with (similar to the stuff that made the book)
  • Theory and tips of a more actionable and practical nature

On this site:

  • Comedy and commentary on things happening in the world of magic
  • Discussion of broader theoretical concepts
  • Tricks that are less "usable" but still may be interesting to read aboutsimilar to the "Field Reports" I used to do on this site

For example, in the coming weeks I'll be posting a trick where you eat a throw-pillow. This is something I've done once in my life and probably won't do again and it doesn't have any real application in any other trick. You won't be like, "Say... I think that technique he uses to eat a throw-pillow is really going to translate well into my Shadow Coins routine."


I spent a lot of time (and far too much money) in 2016 traveling around, meeting people and testing out new ideas for this site and the JAMM. I'm looking forward to sharing some of the ideas with you over the course of 2017. 

On Wednesday I'll be giving away some 2016 awards. Who had the dumbest post on the Magic Cafe? What was the least essential deck of custom playing cards released? Find out the answers to these and more on Wednesday.

On Friday I want to discuss a new way of considering magic and performance that I've been thinking about a lot over the past few months. It's an extension of the audience-centric concept and attempts to answer the question of why specifically I think magic is a valuable tool to engage people with, especially if you're not drawn to the traditional "Magician" role (as I am not). It's the type of thinking that will really connect with a few of you and make the rest of you say, "This guy's really got his head up his own ass." 

It's good to be back. And up your nose with a rubber hose. Up all of our noses with rubber hoses.

 

 

The Rebel Drones of Factory Ward 8 (Luna Sector)

The New Year is almost upon us. The next year of The Jerx is less than two weeks away.

What are your resolutions? Mine are to eat more fudge and smoke more Old Golds. I like to start the year off with some quick wins. 

If you have more traditional resolutions, here is a mental framework that may help you achieve them.

Ultimately, every resolution comes down to self-discipline. The most ingenious plans to lose weight or stop smoking or do whatever will still require you to exert self control. There's really no way around it. 

Here is the way I frame self-discipline to make it a more attractive choice, rather than just the "good" or "proper" choice. It starts off by thinking of the concepts of free will and determinism. Are we literally making choices as we go through life? Or is everything we think, feel, and do the result of a chain of events that came before? Is our free will just an illusion? 

I find these questions neither interesting nor helpful. But they do form the foundation of how I imagine the universe operates that is useful for me. 

I imagine that both things are true. I imagine that everything is predetermined and that, via effort, we can exercise our free will. 

I imagine life like sledding down an endless hill. If you don't exert yourself you will just continue along the path that's been laid out before you. But you don't have to do that. You can shift your weight to alter your direction. Or you can put your feet out to flip the whole fucking thing over and start walking back up the hill. 

Now, this technique presupposes that you believe having free will is the preferred situation. For me, at least, that's the more romantic notion than that we are just acting out roles that have already been predetermined. So I frame self-discipline as an expression of free will. That makes it the more attractive choice for me. 

So, for example, I may think what I want to do for the next couple of hours. My natural inclination might be to watch Netflix and eat a tray of brownies. But I know I should go out and get some exercise. Instead of trying to force myself to go exercise by rationalizing it as the "better" choice or the more productive choice or the right choice, I just imagine laying around and watching Netflix as the pre-determined path. It's what I would do if I was just floating through life and not utilizing my free will. It's what I would do on automatic pilot. So now making myself exercise (or socialize, or work on a project, or complete any other task requiring self-discipline) is not an act of austerity, but an act of defiance. It's an F-you to the gods, or fate, or the universe, or quantum mechanics, or whatever you want to see as the entity behind the determinism. Try it yourself. When you feel like playing Super Mario Run for another hour even though there are a dozen other more fulfilling pursuits you could be doing, just say, "Aha! That's just what they want me to do. Sorry. You'll have to find yourself some other puppet." Then go work on your novel or whatever.

I'm not saying you need to be 100% productive and you can't coast sometimes. I coast a lot. But if you find yourself not doing the things you want, and only following an easy, unfulfilling path, it might help to think of things this way.

No exercise of self-discipline is too small for me to not see it as a triumph of self-determination over fate.

In My Mind: I'm the hero of a dystopian teen novel. The sentries of Factory Ward 8 are wondering, "What's to be done with this 'Andy' character? Multiple times a day he leaves the post he's assigned to—with the other drones, manually turning the giant turbine that generates the power for Luna Sector—and goes off his pre-determined path. Perhaps he needs to be reprogrammed." As they discuss this I have, once again, left my station and I'm attempting to wake up the other glassy-eyed captives to join me in my rebellion. I've rerouted the current to blow the doors off the factory prison! Wake up, you fools! An explosion is heard and the sentries turn just in time to see me flick them off as I, and the others I've managed to rouse, make our escape. "Choke on shit, motherfuckers!" I scream as we go.

In Reality: I've motivated myself to remove the empty Burger King bag from the backseat of my car rather than leave it there to be dealt with later (my natural impulse).

You might think only an idiot would find any motivation in imaging self-discipline in this way—as an expression of free will. And that's fair, maybe I'm an idiot. But if you're an idiot too, maybe it will work for you. And if it does work you'll find yourself actually enjoying practicing self-discipline. If you're like me, you'll feel more tuned into life when you are steering the ship rather than letting it be tossed about on the waves of your basest instincts. It feels good to imagine you're exercising your free will. And it feels good in a way that taking sensible, mature actions usually doesn't. Perhaps it even gives you a dopamine hit similar to fucking or eating a doughnut (or fucking a doughnut).

And after a little while, it doesn't matter if you actively think this way or not, because eventually you just become this person. You will have effectively trained yourself to appreciate the exertion of self-discipline in the moment. You won't just be engaging in discipline for some future reward.

At least that's been my experience.

Happy New Year, everyone. See you in 2017.