Hooks

Hooks are another set of tools that are available to the amateur performer but not the professional. 

A "hook" is anything that causes the other person to (seemingly) initiate the interaction that will lead to the performance of a trick. They can be used with anyone, but they're especially valuable with people you haven't performed for in the past.

Let's put you in the spectator's position and take it out of the world of magic.

Imagine you went to visit a new friend and, at some point, out of the blue he asks, "Can I perform a Shakespearian monologue for you?" This could probably come off as a little weird and potentially a little off-putting. "Has he been planning on performing a Shakespearian monologue for me all day? Am I supposed to clap at the end? Is he expecting a certain response?"

If you don't know the person that well, and you don't have a history of watching this person rehearse theatrical monologues, it would likely feel a little odd. 

Any time you do something that suggests, "I have been planning this interaction between us and you didn't know about it," that's a weird position to put someone else in. 

Now, let's go back. This time you visit your new friend's place and while he's microwaving some pizza rolls you pick up a book of Shakespeare off the coffee table.

"Are you reading Shakespeare?" you ask.

"Oh, no," he says. "Well, not really. I have to memorize a monologue for an audition I'm working on."

"What's the monologue?"

"It's from Julius Caesar. Actually, would it be okay if I run it by you? I need to practice performing it in front of real people."

That's going to come off as a much more natural interaction than him just coming out and asking to perform the monologue.  From your perspective, you're the one who started the two of you down this road by mentioning the book in the first place. You don't feel ambushed or set-up because you started it.

In this case, the book on the coffee table is the "hook." 

I think that "set-up" feeling can be especially strong with magic because, so often, people see magic as a test of their intelligence. A hook can be a way to circumvent them having their guard up because it makes the interaction seem less planned.

Once people know me, and know what they're in for when I show them a trick, then a hook's value is more about the fluidity of getting into the trick itself. But with a first-time spectator, the benefit of the hook is to put them at ease by seemingly allowing the interaction to commence based on something they've said or done.

Examples of Hooks in Magic

I'll list three here today, but the number of hooks are endless. (I have a couple hundred that I've come up with for myself at this point.) There are verbal hooks, story hooks, style hooks, object hooks, and a bunch of other categories I've come up with since I started thinking about this subject.

Let's start with the most obvious...

A Deck of Cards

A deck of playing cards can be an easy, obvious hook to initiate a magic performance. 

In fact, it is perhaps too obvious. If you take a seat at a bar and pull out a deck of cards and set it in front of you, that's not really a hook. That's just a blatant attempt to get someone to interact with you in regards to this object you've brought out. 

But in other situations it can be a more subtle cue to someone to question why you have it. I write a lot in coffee shops and often have a deck of cards with me because of what I'm writing. They might just be at my side while I write, or in a pile with other objects. And I can't tell you how many times someone has asked why I have cards with me. In fact, there have been multiple occasions where someone says, "Oh, do you know any card tricks!" (I'm always like, "Uhm...hmmm...my grandpa did teach me one once. How did that go? Let me think...." Then I go on to blow their mind with a genuine miracle.)

In the JAMM #1, in the article, She's Gotta Have It (which you should read if this subject is of interest to you) I make the point that if you go somewhere and pull out a deck of cards and set it on the table, you look like someone who's waiting for someone to ask him why he has a deck of cards—it's a little needy. But if you pull out a deck of cards, and your wallet, and your keys, and set them on the table; then you look like someone who has just emptied his pockets for the sake of comfort. Then the question isn't, "What does this guy want to show me with that deck of cards?" but, "Why is he carrying cards with him?" That may seem like a subtle difference, but I think it's one people can feel. Pulling out a deck of cards by itself and setting it on the table is an initial offering. But if it's just an object among others in the vicinity then it's the person who asks, "Why do you have a deck of cards with you?" who is making the initial offering.

Pictures

I have a number of different ideas for "picture hooks." This one comes from Chris, the police detective I wrote about in this post

Because of some interoffice shenanigans at work, Chris had put a single framed photo on his desk. It was a picture of Dai Vernon. This is from Chris' email to me...

Because it is such a unique picture to have framed, and the only thing on the desk, people would ask who it was, why did I have it, etc. After a while I started answering, “Oh, he’s an old mentor of mine” which would lead to the next question, which was, of course, “What type of mentor?” To which I would absentmindedly answer, sleight of hand. Which of course lead to the question, "Would you show me something?” which of course I would.

I think that's a great idea. If I still worked in an office, I'd use it. As it is, I've taken a photo of an old man and stuck it to my refrigerator. It's next to some other family photos but the old man is obviously out of place. The other day a guy was over my place to fix my furnace and asked if the picture was of my grandfather. I said no, it's an old mentor of mine. Which eventually transitioned into me showing him a trick. Now, normally I would never show the guy who was going to fix my furnace a trick. But this hook is so strong and the path from "who is this?" to "can I see a trick?" is essentially automatic so as soon as he mentioned the picture I started planning what I would show him.

As I said, pictures make great hooks. And this one is especially good because the concept of a "mentor" that taught you magic is an inherently interesting thing.

Books

Books make great hooks. And not just because that's fun to say, but because books are something you can carry with you and allow you to put essentially any subject into play. 

Let me take a step back. I tend to view creating an experience from an effect like setting up dominos to fall. 

So let's say I have some slates that I can make writing appear on. That trick, from showing the slates blank, to making the writing appear, is a certain segment of dominos falling over. If you walked out and said, "Look, there's nothing on the slates. Now I put them together. Now there is a word on the slates." You would have successfully knocked over the dominos of the trick itself in its most basic form.

What the best magicians in the word do is they set up a series of dominos before the dominos of the trick itself. These are dominos that put the trick in some context. These are the dominos of dimming the lights and lighting a candle and having a ceremony where you reach out to some dead entity. And these dominos all fall and lead into the dominos of you showing the slates blank and the word appearing. 

Now, when you add a hook to your presentation, what you're doing is just adding a couple more dominos to the beginning of your row of dominos. And you're essentially going to set a trap to get the audience to push the first domino themselves

The Hook --> The Story (presentation) --> The Effect

Without a hook, the slate trick begins with you pushing the first domino. You say, "Do you think it's possible to communicate with the dead?" That's certainly a fascinating topic, but it's still you getting things in motion. And that's always going to feel much more planned and set-up than if you can goad them into toppling over that first domino. 

As I said, books are great for that because they allow you to introduce any topic you want into the equation. I especially like old books and weird books. 

One of my favorites is this one that was given to me by an ex-girlfriend.

IMG_4380.JPG

If that's on your coffee table, or near you while you're doing some writing at a cafe, it's the type of thing that will draw a comment or a joke or a question. And if you're just like, "I don't know. I found it at this book sale and I thought it would be interesting to read." And then you go back and forth a little with the person, and then, almost as an afterthought, you say, "Actually... do you want to see something strange?" And then you go into this weird ritual you supposedly learned from the book. That feels much different and much more natural than you approaching someone cold or bringing up the subject up out of nowhere.

Tally Your Jerx Points

If you have 100 or more Jerx Points, send me an email letting me know how you accumulated the points by Friday the 24th to get the 20/20 e-book. "But I sent you an email six months ago with that information." Yeah, I wasn't keeping track then, ding-dong. Re-send it.

If that paragraph above makes absolutely no sense to you, don't worry about it. You're not missing out on anything super significant. I promise you. The 20/20 e-book is just a little bonus for people who wanted to do something above and beyond buying the things I've released. They did this by earning Jerx Points for different activities.

Like getting a GLOMM tattoo (or marginally less crazy things).

download.jpeg

Thoughts on Follow-Thru

Do you know what I take the most pride in? It's not having the greatest blog ever written. It's not my award-winning magic book. It's not how I'm redefining the performance of magic for the 21st century. Yes, all this is so obviously true that it goes without saying and isn't really open for debate, but these aren't the things I'm most proud of.

I'm proud that I said, "I'm going to write a book," and then I wrote one. Then I said, "I'm going to put out a magazine," and the 6th of the month it always shows up in subscriber's mailboxes. And I'm proud that, for a couple of years now, I've written this site on the exact schedule I've said I would. 


One of my favorite stories in magic is the story of the Braue Notebooks. Basically, this dope, Jeff Busby, took a bunch of money to release a series of publications from the notebooks of Fred Braue (old-time magic guy). He took 10s of thousands of dollars from people and said he would release 15 issues over the course of a year and a half. This was in 1985. He ended up releasing 5 volumes that year. ("Volumes" makes it sound like a hardcover encyclopedia. I'm pretty sure it was spiral bound, 1980s Kinko's quality.) Then he stopped! And then—almost as a goof—he releases another volume in 1992, then one in 96 and one in 97. Then he stops again! And this time we can assume it's for good, given that he died in 2014. Presumably, buried with the last 7 volumes he promised.

I get it. Follow-thru can be tough. That's why I'm proud of keeping on schedule here. I try to put myself in Busby's situation, with that huge obligation hanging over my head; owing people products for money they gave me ten years ago that is now long gone. That must have been a rough way to go through life. Or, maybe he was a genuine shithead and didn't really care. I don't know. 


As I said, follow-thru is a bitch. On his facebook page, Craig Petty launched something called Project 365 where he was going to post a new magic video every day for a year. He didn't last 3 weeks. He claimed he stopped because it was making people look at him more as a magician than a public speaker. Like, yeah, no shit. That's what posting a magic video every day will do. Who could have guessed? The truth is, he didn't stop because the videos were just so good and so popular that it was overshadowing his speaking career. He stopped because people weren't watching and commenting on the videos. When you're staring down the barrel of 49 more weeks of no one acknowledging what you're doing, follow-thru is a real M.F.'er, even for a guy who calls himself The U.K.'s #1 Motivational Magician. 


While I enjoy watching people crash and burn when it comes to the commitments they've made, I enjoy it more when they see it through.

One project that's been going on for a few years now that has definitely earned my respect is Dan Harlan's video series of his reinterpretations of every trick in the Tarbell Course

Dan is now 80-something videos into this project. He releases a new video every couple weeks. In each video he teaches everything from one of the chapters of Tarbell. He not only teaches the items, but he updates them, offers new handlings, modernizes the context, and performs them in front of a live audience. This is a crazy amount of work to commit to.

You can say, "Well, of course he's committed to the project, he's getting paid." But that doesn't make it somehow less of an achievement. He's getting paid because people are finding value in it.

"Well I can find the original Tarbell course for free online. I'm not going to pay for a video version of it." That's fair, but it is 100 years old. Magic methods have evolved, as has society. It's perhaps an unfortunate part of the history of our craft that we don't want to address, but it's worth noting that lesson 96 in the Tarbell course is entitled, Magic with Negroes, and features a trick called, That Ol' Picaninny Hoodoo.

...

Okay. I made that up. But to be fair, you almost believed me. You were like, "Hmmm... yeah that seems possible." So the point kind of stands that it may serve us to re-examine these routines from a modern perspective.

The truth is, I've only seen a couple of these, so this isn't a review. (I'm a completist, and since I didn't subscribe early on, to catch up now isn't financially feasible.) From what I've read, it's been pretty well received. But I'm not even talking about quality. I'm just talking about effort and follow-thru. Honestly, it would take a lot of effort to do this project poorly. So the fact that it's had favorable reviews only makes it more impressive. And I just want to recognize what he's doing because I think the commitment to the project deserves recognition.


One of my favorite examples of follow-thru in magic is still Casshan Wallace's goal of creating a new magic trick every day for a month. Then going on to create a new magic trick (and shoot a video of it) every hour for a full day. I originally wrote about this two years ago, and thankfully it's all still up on his youtube channel.

I love Casshan's style. Half cool, half stupid. 

Gardyloo #40

If I'm not mistaken, if you do 8 perfect faro shuffles in a row, it will bring a deck back to the same order you started in. 

I'm not a big fan of the faro shuffle. It doesn't look like the way a normal person shuffles cards (at least in the U.S.) and to make sure it's a perfect faro requires a level of concentration that I prefer my presentations not contain. So it's not a move I've put in the work to perfect.

But the other day I was sitting around thinking about automatic card shufflers and wondering if they do a perfect weave. It seemed unlikely when I first thought of it, but then I thought, "Why not? If the two sides are shooting cards out automatically at a consistent pace, is it so crazy to think that they might weave perfectly?"

My idea was I would take a deck in new deck order, send it through the machine six times before my friend showed up. Then when he showed up I'd show him the mixed up deck and say that I think my automatic card shuffle was broken. Then I'd send the deck through two more times, spread it across the table and it would be in new deck order. After that I'd say, "What a hunk of shit," pick it up, and throw it against the wall. (I found them at Walmart for $7. Destroying it seemed worth it.)

So, I got one. Separated the red cards from the black cards and sent them through.

IMG_4378.GIF

If it's not clear, the answer is no, they don't weave perfectly. They started out perfect but then you had two cards from each side going through in a number of cases. 

Well...there goes that idea.


Some little details tying together the imagery featuring Nikki, the JAMM Muse for November in Issue #10.

On the cover she is wearing these dotted white contact lenses, giving her a milky eye.

Screen Shot 2017-11-10 at 3.11.10 AM.png

Then, in the image that goes along with the Word of Mouth trick, she is getting ready to eat with the bent spoon from the cover shot.

Cover10.jpg

It's the little things, guys.


Does anyone know a good way for me to accidentally burn my fucking face off?


I got this in my email a few weeks ago...

Screen Shot 2017-11-10 at 1.52.59 AM.png

What a great idea. Nothing adds to the enjoyment of wasting your money on a terrible effect than slowly and painfully paying for it over the course of a year. 


Never mind, guys. I asked a question a couple segments above this one. But I think I've found the perfect solution


I went on a Cowsills jag after writing up yesterday's post. I watched like a dozen videos of them on youtube and then a documentary on Amazon. 

This was my favorite video. It's pretty unusual for the time because it's them performing The Rain, The Park and Other Things on a tv show, but actually singing it live. The best part is Susan Cowsill grooving on that tambourine. I love the spirit and energy of her performance. I want to absorb it and radiate it back into the world.

The JAMM, The Deck and Other Things

We're winding down on The JAMMS.

Issue 11, The Holiday Issue, comes out December 6th. Then the final issue on January 6th. 

I've been asked if there's going to be a "Collected JAMM" released at some point. If you mean a hard copy version, the answer is no. Although you're free to do whatever you want with the pdf files for your own use. I looked into the cost of printing a 300 page hardcover book with color images from pdf files and it was like $75-$100 per copy. If you want to do that, knock yourself out, Moneybags.

If you mean, am I going to collect them into one large ebook and sell it at a discount, the answer is also No.

I have some fundamental rules in regards to how I handle the commercial aspect of this site. One is that things will be released when I say they'll be released (whether that be a book, an issue of the magazine, or a post on the site). The second is that people who offer their support early on will never end up paying more for something than someone who came late to the game. If I had an extra box of unclaimed books and I wanted to get rid of them, I'd rather just set that shit on fire than offer them at a discount. 

I have been told by someone who is a genuine guru of internet marketing that I could likely double any revenue this site produces by releasing less expensive versions of the same product. In other words, sell a hardcover book with a couple bonuses for the hardcore fans, and then, sometime later, sell a significantly cheaper version—perhaps a soft-cover one, without the bonuses—for the casual readers of this site.

I don't doubt that would work. But if increased revenue was my goal, I wouldn't be writing a magic blog. The writing I've done outside of magic isn't often as enjoyable this, but it's much more lucrative and much easier than the time it takes to generate, test, and then write-up the ideas here and in The JAMM.

And that's the good thing about this. If writing about magic was my only option to support myself, then I'd need to appeal to a broad audience. The material and the writing would have to become a little blander and less experimental and that would ultimately be the death of this site. But because I have something to "fall back on" should this site go away, then I can just follow my whims. If there are enough die-hard fans to support it, then it continues, and if not, I go on to other things.

So that's why I don't take the casual reader into account when I think about how to fund this site. If appealing to them was a priority, the site would be much different and would probably suck.

So, no, there will be no Collected JAMM at a discount. $10/issue was the discount.

Also, if you want to guarantee you get the free Jerx Deck, then I wouldn't wait too long to purchase the full volume of The JAMM. It's hard to say how many are available because it kind of depends how many month-to-month subscribers who started after February are going to end up converting their subscription to a full-volume order (which would qualify them for the deck). We'll see. The artwork files for the deck are now in the hands of The Expert Playing Card Company who has substantially cut their minimum order for us. So there won't be many of this deck made and they'll never be made again.

And finally the silent auction for Stasia Burrington's original artwork for The JAMM #7 ends on Tuesday. See the post a couple of days ago for details on that.

The Faux Secret Imp

This idea comes from friend-of-the-site, Cristian Scaramella. It's an example of the type of thing I was writing about on Monday, and in line with a lot of the stuff I've written about in recent months about extending the effect with "exo-trick" moments (things that happen outside the trick itself). 

Here is how I used it this weekend. 

After a yoga class this weekend (yeah, that's right, don't judge me) I had a couple friends from the class come by my place to watch a movie and order some dinner. 

After dinner I asked them if they wanted to see a trick I was working on. They said, "No," and then went home.

No, I'm kidding. They said "sure" and I went and got a few half dollars. 

My two friends were sitting on the couch and I was standing facing them behind a coffee table. I asked them to hold on for a second and I went to a bookshelf across the room, opened a little box, fiddled around with something, and then walked back to them.

I was now wearing a ring. The ring wasn't weird or ostentatious. If I'd been wearing it all night it wouldn't have stood out. The only unusual thing was that I went out of my way to put it on before this trick.

FullSizeRender.jpg

I then showed them the trick. 

I had three half dollars and one by one they disappeared into thin air. (The trick is Joshua Jay's Triad Coins.)

The only thing different in my handling is that before each coin would vanish, I would tap it with my ring. It wasn't like an obvious gesture of tapping the coin with my ring for some kind of emphasis. It was just a kind of quick movement, not hidden, but not overt or done for attention. 

The last coin didn't vanish the first time I tried to make it go. And, if you were one of my friends, you might have noticed me sliding my ring up and down the coin a few times while I ad-libbed some stuff about making the last coin disappear. Eventually I tried it again and the coin did disappear. 

When the trick was over I walked back to the bookshelf, took off the ring, attached something to it, and put it back in the box. Then I excused myself to go to the bathroom. 

I went around the corner, turned the bathroom light on, and closed the door, but I didn't actually go in. Instead I hung out and listened to them talk. I couldn't make out exactly what they were saying because they were speaking softly. Eventually, they got up and walked to the bookshelf. I saw them pull the box of the shelf and open it.

Here's what they saw...

Screen Shot 2017-11-08 at 3.12.20 AM.png

One of them started laughing, the other turned to her with her mouth open and placed her hand on the other girl's shoulder. 

I snuck back to the bathroom, quietly opened and shut the door, flushed the toilet, washed my hands, and came out. 

They had scurried back to the couch by the time I got in the room. They were both looking at me. One was smiling with bright eyes. The other was cutely scowling.

"Whaddup, whaddup?" I said, plopped down in a chair, and fired up my Netflix account.

"So...," one of them said, "I liked your trick, Andy. Very impressive. Very interesting," she said.

I knew what she wanted. She wanted me to say, "Oh, thank you. And did you happen to notice my box of magic rings?" If I acknowledged it, then it would sever that tiny thread of mysterious tension. It would confirm their suspicion that this was all a little bit of theater. But while I know that's what they're likely to think anyway, I don't want to confirm that for them. I want a small part of their brain to wonder if maybe there's some practical reason why I need to wear certain rings for certain tricks. And I want to keep alive the tiny spark of an idea in the irrational part of their brain that maybe somehow these rings allow me to do certain things. 

So instead I was just like, "Cool, cool, cool. Ooh... Avalanche Sharks... this looks interesting."


The Faux Secret Imp is the idea of using a ring (or some other kind of "artifact" as Cristian described it to me in his email) as the impetus for the magic. But you act like you're trying to hide it from them. 

To a certain extent this should be how you treat most Imps. That is to say, the term Imp is short for Impetus, but it can also serve to remind you that, most often, these things should be IMPlied. 

What I mean is this: If I say, "If we sync our breathing, I can read your mind," that's pretty easy to dismiss as nonsense. On the other hand, if I try and read your mind and it doesn't seem to be working, then I ask you to do some deep breathing with me, and then I'm able to read your mind, the implication is that there's some connection there. But that's a connection you make. If I say it outright, it's easier to dismiss. If you make the connection yourself, I think you're likely to consider it more.

That's why I say that in most cases the impetus should be implied. 

The Faux Secret Imp takes that a step further. Not only don't you directly credit the Imp as causing the magic, you seemingly try and hide the use of it altogether.

I'm hoping this example clarifies what I was talking about on Monday. Looking at a 3-Coin Vanish from an endo-trick perspective, you might try new sleights or new gimmicks to improve the trick. I think Josh's trick is about as good as your going to get. There may be advancements that make it better from a knowledgable magician's perspective, but they will be things that most laypeople will never pick up on. So the endo-trick perspective is limited in that way. And, as great as the effect is, I think it has the same issue a lot of magic tricks do (certainly coin tricks). That being that it's visually arresting but not the type of thing that's going to be captivating long-term for the spectator.

While endo-trick improvement is limited, exo-trick improvement is infinite. The things you do before a trick and after a trick and the seemingly extraneous things within a trick—these things that place the effect in a different context—are things that can always be honed and refined in a way a spectator can understand and appreciate. 

A lot of this type of stuff is kind of "meta" in a way. It's presentation about the presentation of magic. And I think that's a good thing. You're not going to convince someone that your fiction is somehow truer than the reality they know. No one will say, "I thought coins couldn't disappear, but I guess I was wrong" But you can put a twist in your own fiction, so you still get that same kind of surprise moment. "I thought this was happening, but really it was that." Even if "this" and "that" are both just different levels of fantasy, that's still an engaging experience.


Now we're back at my apartment the other night. The smiler has left and the scowler has stayed to watch another movie. When it's over I walk her out to her car. Under the light of the street lamp I give her a hug goodbye, then I take her left hand in mine and press my right hand on top in a kind of odd way. She looks down. There's a ring on my finger! Which one? The mind reading one? "Yes, yes," I say, nodding. "I had a good time too," as if agreeing with some unspoken thought.

She smiles then bites her lower lip and punches me in the shoulder.

Own a Piece of History

I am auctioning off "Locks of Hair," the original artwork for The JAMM #7, the female Houdini image created by Stasia Burrington. This is an ink painting on heavy white paper. It measures 8.5x11 inches, and will be shipped to the winning bidder in a cello bag and stay-flat mailer

There is only one of these in existence. Buy it now and then, in a few years, really stick it to Copperfield when you sell it to him for his collection.

This is a silent auction. You can email me with your bid over the next week. The winner will be notified on Tuesday the 14th.

IMG_4372.JPG