Dustings of Woofle #21

First, some housekeeping.

giphy.gif

The 2019 season of The Jerx ends on December 23rd.

The 2020 season—if there is one—will start up in February.

“If there is one”? Are you threatening us?

No, sweetie. Relax. If you’re new to this site, this is how it works: There are a group of supporters who fund the site each year. In return they get a bunch of bonus content including a book/newsletter/deck of cards, etc. These supporter slots are capped off at a certain number. At the end of each season I ask the supporters if they want to sign up again for another year. If at least 90% of the supporters say they want to buy in for another year, then I keep the site going. At some point I’ll probably want to stop the site for my own purposes, but as of now I’m happy to keep it going as long as people want me to. And this 90% threshold is a simple way of determining if people are still digging the site.

So that stuff will all be figured out at the beginning of next year. Assuming there is interest for a 2020 season, any unclaimed supporter slots will be made available in February.

The 2020 season will likely have a different schedule. I’ll give more details on that in the future. Content-wise the site will be different too. I’ve talked about that in this post.


An update on my Bounty Hunting post.

Regarding the fortune-telling napkin-holder thing: I learned that it’s a real thing that used to exist (not just a Twilight Zone invention). I think I’ve got a line on one from the 50s, so I won’t have to have one made. Although I want to thank the people who offered to create one. That would have been a fun process to be involved with. But it would probably be a needlessly complicated route to take.

$_57.JPG_5ad44a7a4a2db2.62971387.jpg

Regarding the 1-on-1 PK Touches routine: Still looking into this one. I’m not sure any of the commercially available routines are going to work for my purposes, but I think I might be onto something after a brainstorm with Seth Raphael and Marc Kerstein. Seth’s initial idea was very clever (I may ask him if I can share it with you in the future) but wouldn’t have been ideal of the presentation I wanted to do. But it inspired a tangential method that I’m working on now. I’ll keep you updated.

Regarding the container trick: I had a lot of good ideas come my way. To remind you, the effect would use stackable containers the screw together. You’d put something in the top container, shake it, and it would fall down to the next container, and so on. So it would look like this:

IMG_6531.GIF

Except for the fact that something would actually happen.

A lot of the ideas sent my way might look good on video, but few would hold up if done in person. (Anything using a hole between layers would, I think, get busted fairly easily.)

Here are some ideas from reader Erik K, that I thought were pretty interesting.

IMG_8873.jpg
IMG_8874.jpg

I think the one labelled #5 holds some promise, although it’s not exactly what I was looking for. You could have different colored beads in each container. Force one container via some sort of counting force, like Quinta. That container is removed and one bead is taken from it. That “random” bead is dropped in the top container, and there are duplicates of that bead in the other compass positions (South, West, and East if the original bead is dropped in at North) in the other containers. Then you could shake the containers and secretly rotate everything 90 degrees to create the illusion of the randomly selected bead going down.


The Ellusionist kickstarter has ended. Congratulations to them on having such a successful product launch.

Although, to be honest, I’m not sure I 100% agree with the last “stretch goal” they offered with their Kickstarter campaign. See below…

***

We’re excited to announce the final stretch-goal for the How To Read Minds kit. Now, every box will contain a pack of Black Dragon Extreme Hypnotism Pills.

Buy-Flunitrazepam-Rohypnol.jpg

Sometimes you need to pull out the BIG GUNS. Black Dragon Extreme Hypnotism Pills will make you the coolest guy in school, the talk of the office, and the envy of your church group.

Will it get people to buy you a drink? No, probably not. In fact, you’ll likely have to buy them a drink to use these most efficaciously.

But it will be worth it for the powers of seduction in a box!

Why should the guys with the personality and charisma have all the fun?

Screen+Shot+2019-12-05+at+9.29.24+PM.jpg


Mailbag #18

giphy.gif

Really excited about the [new] book. Over the weekend I re-read most of Magic For Young Lovers again (I think my 4th time reading it cover to cover, not to mention reading my favorite parts even more times).

I was wondering if you're gonna tip anything more about the book to us. It's already December!! Maybe the title at least? (TOY?) I think with the past books you posted some descriptions of tricks on the site beforehand. Anything you can do would be awesome. —YR

There’s not going to be too much more information coming about the book. It sold out 10 months ago. It would be one thing to release some details here to whet the appetite of those who had bought it. But the vast majority of the people reading this haven’t bought it, and can’t buy it, so I’d feel like I was just teasing them with info in order to be a dick.

In fact, skip to the next question unless you’re a supporter and have the book coming to you:

I’ll just give you the basics. It’s 240 pages. 25 chapters. It’s about 60% unpublished material. There are some totally impromptu techniques and some big showpiece effects. It covers most of the major concepts I’ve worked on in regards to social/casual mentalism. And it has the results of the longest focus group study I’ve ever been a part of conducting. (120 hours total, because all the performances were done 1-on-1.)

Mentalism was an interesting subject to write about. It’s my belief that it’s very difficult to maintain people’s interest in the long-term when you present everything as a demonstration of your own powers. But that’s exactly what mentalism is: a demonstration of your own powers. Originally, when I had the idea to do a mentalism book a couple years ago, I imagined it would be me taking traditional routines and reframing them so that they were no longer mentalism. But that’s not what it became. In the end, all of these tricks are still mentalism, but the presentations are little less straight-forward than, “I can read your mind” or “I can predict the future.”

You’ll see.


Have you given any more thought to having a message board/facebook group/discord server or something to discuss The Jerx? You need to do it! —CF

No, I really don’t.

I have a lot of reasons for why I won’t be doing something like this. I’ve hit on some of them before.

The main reason is this: I’m just some dude.

Imagine you’re just some dude, or dudette, and people are saying, “We need a space where we can discuss your ideas.” Gross. It just feels weird to me. Especially because—unless I’m talking shit about Ellusioinist—most of what I write comes from my experiences with people in my life who don’t know I’m writing about these things. So then to have other people writing about those things publicly, that would be strange.

Here’s the thing, if there’s something I’ve written that you want to question or expand upon, you can just write me. I’m not dead. I want to hear about it. I don’t want to have to track it down on a message board somewhere. And if it pushes the subject forward, then maybe it will be in a post or a mailbag or in a newsletter or book. But even if not, it will go into my brain and become part of my thinking on the subject going forward.

I think that’s enough.

People will sometimes use the phrase (and I’ve used it myself) a “jerx-style” of magic. But keep in mind that that’s just my style. I’m not saying it’s a style you should adopt. I’m saying there might be something in my experience that you will find some value in; either because you have a similar personality, a similar friend-group, or similar performing situations. But I’m not hoping or expecting or wanting to “convert” anyone to my style. Just take the stuff that you think will work well for you and incorporate it into your own style.

Then the question might become, “Well, how about some sort of forum where people can talk about social/casual magic in general?”

Eh. I just don’t think you need more places to talk about magic. Especially not online. A forum or facebook group is kind of against the spirit of social magic, which I see as being about engaging people in real life, and discovering an approach that works for you in your own circumstances.

That being said, if Steve Brooks wants to sell the Magic Cafe, I’ll buy it and make it good.


My thoughts on your “Defining Reality” post.

[You write]:

They’re unlikely to think, “Well, there was the time he showed me a trick about a ghost dog who cut the deck to my card, and then there was the time he turned a red sponge ball into a red sponge cock, but now here… where he’s saying he’s reading my mind… you know, I think he’s really doing it!”

Though your conclusion is logical, it is (mostly) false.

Unfortunately, a very small percentage of people connect the dots as you assume they will ("I saw that he did card tricks, I've seen that he's good at tricking people, therefore the mindreading was also probably a trick.").

I've heard various people volunteer their conclusions: from hobos, to my patent lawyer grandpa, to Barbara Walters.

Of these responses I've cited, all but my grandpa's response are on video publicly viewable:

1. About 20 years ago my grandpa saw David Blaine or Criss Angel (I forget which) perform various tricks on TV, and then levitate. My grandpa said that the other stuff was tricks, but he thinks the levitation was something to do with spirits or occult, that David is messing with bad stuff.

2. Using his classic pass (one of the best classic passes ever), Derek Dingle performed Ambitious Card for Barbara Walters. He then fanned the deck and told Walters to think of a card. Dingle revealed the thought of card. Barbara said, "I can understand the card tricks, but when you read my mind!"

3. Hobo from Blaine's first TV special. Blaine threw hobo's card through window. After this (at least this was shown on the TV special as after) the hobo told the camera, "The card tricks I get, but the mind reading is real."

[…]

In conclusion, though it should be obvious that the guy who has spent years mastering the art of tricking people does not have a miraculous natural gift, I've heard expressions of belief (in the mentalism specifically) more frequently than the expressions indicating the correct, logical conclusion. This is despite the fact that I'm a card man.

Surprisingly, one of the very few who arrived at the correct conclusion (and also gave me his (correct) reasoning), was a 7 year old boy. It was a fundraiser held in a hoity toity home. There were a few younger kids--around age 7--who had been tagging along watching me perform for the adults. Towards the end, I did some mentalism for the kids--a book test with a book in their house, a drawing dupe with my business cards, etc. The boy said (after I probed for his thoughts) "Well.. I know that you can make cards go places. So maybe when I put my drawing back in, you made go somewhere where you could see it." —JF

I appreciate your perspective. And if you really believe people think this, I won't be able to talk you out of it.

But I think you're confusing this sentiment: "I understand card tricks and the idea of sleight of hand, but I have no clue how someone does the mind reading stuff." Which is very common. For this sentiment, "I think the card tricks were fake, but on the other hand I think he has genuine mind reading abilities." Which very few rational adults would think.

If Barbara Walters thought she had found a true mind-reader do you think she would have dropped it at that? One of the pre-eminent journalists of her day just relegating one of the biggest discoveries in the history of the world to her daytime talk show?

Also, I don't think the 7-year old had insights the adults didn't have. He just didn't have the filter they did. Many adults likely come to the same conclusion.

As far as your grandfather goes, he was, of course, reacting to a TV special effect, not something that could be done live. So that could play into things.

And finally, I was writing specifically about the amateur performing for people who know him/her. Perhaps there are some people who believe Blaine does some fake magic tricks, but also has some true supernatural powers. But I doubt those people are the people who know him in real life.

Look, the majority of people don’t believe in psychic phenomena in the first place. Of those who do, I would think a much smaller percentage believe it’s something that can be demonstrated so directly (knowing the word you wrote down on a business card, for example), and that percentage is going to be even less when the “psychic demonstration” is in an entertainment context, and then again less so if the psychic demonstration is mixed in with magic tricks. And, of course, once they really get to know you, it’s unlikely they’ll see you as having genuinely supernatural abilities. So we’re talking a percentage of a percentage of a percentage of a percentage of a percentage. Undoubtedly these people exist, but they’re the exception. (If you don’t believe this, it’s something that would be very easy to test. If you want to fund it, I have the people who can test it for you.)

Of course, confirmation bias gets in the way of us getting a clear picture of how people truly see us (which is why testing has proven to be so valuable). We take the nice things people say directly after a trick and act as if that’s representative of how they really feel.

A few years ago I was discussing a similar topic with a friend, Tom, and he said, “My wife really believes I’m psychic.” I was like, no, there’s not a chance in hell she thinks that. Then he gave me a list of things she had said which supported his assumption. I reiterated that there was no way she really thought he was psychic. So we decided to investigate. We had a third-party—a mutual friend who was with us—call her up and say, “I have something I need Tom’s help with. He has some psychic sort of powers, right?”

To which she responded, “What the fuck are you talking about? Like real powers? No, of course not.”

Tom grabbed the phone and immediately started asking her why she had said certain things in the past and responded to effects the way she had and why she would say things to her friends like, “Tom can read your mind,” or, “Tom can predict your future.”

She said something, the gist of which was: “What do you mean? I was just playing along. You pretend to have psychic powers and I pretend you have psychic powers. You thought that I thought you had real powers?” And then she laughed—cackled, really—into the phone for a straight two minutes. And that had me crying laughing too. Tom was so dejected. They had been married nine years at the time. For nine+ years she thought they had this sweet sort of inside joke. And for nine+ years he just assumed she thought he was psychic. (They’re still very happily married.)

Playing along is a natural human response from people who like you. Don’t discount that possibility. There’s nothing wrong with it either. It means they like you and they were genuinely fooled.


In this post you write:

If I tell you that I want to try an old gypsy ritual and at the end of it something amazing happens, you are likely to look at that ritual as part of the “theater” of the trick... But if I try an old gypsy ritual with you and nothing happens, then you don’t really know how to categorize that experience. It’s not presentation for a trick, because there was no trick.

I agree with this idea, but I feel that with some people this won't be the case if the presentation isn't up to snuff. It could be looked upon as "he had some weird theatrical presentation, but then the trick part didn't work." To shift the focus from the trick and onto the failed theater, I think it's important to attempt a fix (but still fail), but to demonstrate the fix is on the presentation side.

For example, with the coin vanish, instead of ending with the initial failure, close your hand around the coin casually but focus on readjusting your other hand's position on their shoulder. For the gypsy ritual, read the passage once more, with genuine concentration on the words. And then fail again.

Something like that subtly suggests that the ritual is the method. If it were a normal trick and the ritual just theatrical dressing, then an attempt to fix it would become completely mechanical - the magician focuses on the part that went wrong. We can also look at Harry Potter. In the scene where they are learning to cast spells, Hermione corrects Ron's pronunciation. She mentions his wand wave is too violent but doesn't seem concerned it will affect the spell (only that he's "going to poke someone's eye out" which has nothing to do with magic - that's just how sticks and eyes work together). The audience is left understanding that the words are the important part. And when Ron eventually gets it right, we're not thinking "oh he finally waved his wand correctly," but rather "he learned the words." —CC

Yeah, I think that’s a good idea.

The rule I would use is that you should do what you would really do in whatever faux situation you’re establishing. So, for example, if I really thought that I could affect someone’s perception via different pressure points, then I might try a few different variations if it didn’t work the first time.

On the other hand, if, for some reason, I really thought I might have an incantation that would make time flow backwards briefly, I wouldn’t keep trying it if it failed. I’d just say, “Oh, this is ridiculous. What was I thinking.”

Basing it off how you might actually address this sort of failure is going to make it feel the most legitimate to them.

I Was Wrong. The Ellusionist Kickstarter Mentalism Kit is the Greatest Product in the History of Magic.

A friend who read an early draft of this post said,

"I don't understand this post at all. It makes no sense. If I'm being honest, I'd say it looks like you just had some Max Maven gifs burning a hole in your pocket and wrote this whole post to shoehorn them in there.”

WHATTTTT??!!!! I mean... seriously? The fact that anyone would think I would write something just for the sake of posting Max Maven memes is ludicrous. "Hello! Table for one at the loony bin!” That's what you should be saying, at an insane asylum that is also a restaurant, because that's what you are if you think that I'd do that: insane.

And no, Ellusionist did not pay me $1800 to write a favorable post about them. That's absurd.

The fact of the matter is, I sat with my thoughts about that Ellusionist beginner's mentalism kit and read the ad very closely. Then I went into the woods and quietly meditated on it. Then I consulted my pastor. Then I did some journaling on the subject. And after a lot of soul searching I realized I was wrong in my initial assessment. It is unreservedly the greatest product in the history of magic.

max_interesting.gif

Look, when I'm wrong, I say I'm wrong. And I was wrong about this. I thought it was a cash-grab by Ellusionist. Putting a bunch of basic mentalism props in a black box with a skull and pitching it to the lonely, the awkward, and the virginal.

I think what I failed to understand was that this isn't a box of mentalism tricks. After giving their kickstarter a much closer read (as I will do in this post), I realized this is something that will change your whole life.

From the kickstarter: "The How To Read Minds Kit is LIFE CHANGING. Open the box and discover….what these secrets do for you. But don’t open it if you don’t want your life to change. Who knew that a dumb 99 plunked down in a Kickstarter event could do so much?"

(No. That quote isn't edited. They put those ellipses in the middle of that sentence, I didn’t cut anything out. You might say you have... no clue as to why. It doesn't make... any fucking sense grammatically or as far as.... expressing an emotion with their writing. Well, well, well... I guess you've never hired someone off Fiverr who speaks English as a fourth language to write your ad copy for you.)

The kit is also described as being "Charisma in a box." This probably strikes you as odd given that the only time "charisma" and "ellusionist" have been used together in a sentence in the past is to say something like, "That guy from Ellusionist has all the charisma of a cement parking barrier." In fact, some of you would argue the mere notion of "charisma in a box" suggests a company that:

A) Doesn't understand the concept of charisma
or
B) Has no issue preying on people with no self-esteem.

Oh yeah? Well, have you ever considered the possibility that BOTH might be true? Didn't think of that, did you, smart guy? So don't go around pretending you know everything.

From the kickstarter: "Ellusionist followed the path of the intuitive, the glam-packed, but NATURAL way of ‘styling’ magic.”

I know you're probably thinking, "Is that supposed to mean something? Or did lightning strike a refrigerator and the magnetic poetry kit on the freezer door got demagnetized and fell to the floor and someone swept up the jumble of words and transcribed them before tossing them in the garbage can?" No! That's not what happened at all. That's a perfectly coherent paragraph. No words go together more than "glam-packed but NATURAL.” That's just a totally reasonable description of something. It is for me, at least. Here's my driver's license photo.

818PkgE6bhL._UX522_.jpg

Glam-packed, and natural.

From the kickstarter: "Gone are top hats and tails, gone are the doves. Let them fly back to the 50’s where they came from. We put the magician on the street in jeans and a tshirt, doing miracles. We made magicians into ROCKSTARS."

Up until 2001, when Ellusionist started, all magicians were wearing top hats and tails and doing dove magic. We all were. Ellusionist changed all that. With their completely unique style.

No they, just ripped off David Blaine.

Oh, come on. What are you basing that on? Facts and chronology? The fact that Blaine’s first special came out four years before Ellusionist started as a company? That’s what you’re basing this on? Something you saw on television?

max_tv_reality.gif

Exactly, Max.

I'm not saying Ellusionist hasn't had their issues in the past, but now they are not just mass-marketing magic to anyone who wants it, they're also providing really sound performance theory:

From the kickstarter: "Magic, and more importantly mind-reading, is meant to be done naturally, almost as an afterthought. Let it just 'occur'. Let your miracles out of the box slowly. There’s no need to pound the table for attention. You’ll never do that again. From now on when you speak, people listen. You will remain connected to those around you, but on another level. Don’t buy this kit if you don’t want that."

So true! Here’s an example of that natural/afterthought style. This is for one of those natural situations where you have a business card on you. And a pen. And an envelope. And another envelope that’s slightly bigger. Typical stuff you would carry with you every day. Then you just throw that all together, casually. I like the person to write down the word, seal it in an envelope, then seal that in another envelope, and only at that point do I subtly suggest that we could maybe do a trick with this particular circumstance. “You know, I just had a thought. An afterthought, if you will. Maybe I should read your mind of the word I had you write down on a business card and put in an envelope and then into another envelope. What a complete crazy afterthought to have just now in this moment. Totally unplanned.”

There’s no doubt that a super casual trick like this will blow people away. And there is something so beautiful about the look of surprise an effect like that can produce on someone’s face.

max_wakeup.gif

From the kickstarter: “You know those basketball games where they pick someone out of the crowd at halftime and give them a shot at the basket for some $50,000 prize?  Can they get the ball in the basket?  If they do, their life changes.  The butterfly moves it’s [sic] wings in America and life changes in China.  The crowd waits on pins and needles.  The ‘player’ shoots their shot and everybody draws a breath and holds it.

That’s exactly how WE’RE waiting on YOU now.  Our breath is drawn, sharply.”

Again, such strong writing. Sure, some of you might suggest that a person’s life changing because of something big and direct like winning $50,000 is the complete and total opposite of the butterfly effect, but that’s just because you don’t understand the poetry of an Ellusionist kickstarter. I suggest you take the night off and really immerse yourself in the beauty of their ad.

max_bowling.gif

Okay, I didn’t know it was your bowling league tonight. Do it tomorrow. Then maybe you’ll understand the artistry of an Ellusionist advertisement.

From the kickstarter: “WILL IT BE YOU, OR WILL YOU BE WATCHING THE GUY DOING THIS STUFF AT YOUR CHRISTMAS PARTY GOING ‘THAT COULD HAVE BEEN ME….’”

Well, just to be clear, you won’t be saying, “That could have been me.” You’ll be saying, “That could have been us.” Because in that case both you and the other dude at the party would have the same little kit of stuff with you. “Hey look!” the hostess will say, “You both randomly brought a fake looking copy of the novel Dracula to a Christmas party. That is amazing!”

So, what do you think? Do you have the balls to buy the greatest product in the history of magic? Or does the thought of free drinks, wild popularity and the unconditional love this kit will most assuredly bring you scare you too much?

Listen, this is a chance to change your life. You can’t imagine how different things are going to be for you when you show people some mentalism reveals on a fake credit card you keep in your wallet. That’s life-changing stuff right there.

I can’t wait to be the coolest guy in school! In fact, I’m probably just going to wear the lid of the box on my head, like a slick, fashion-forward hat. That alone will probably have me beating back potential friends and lovers. When I walk in the room they’ll all say, “Damn, he’s fly!”

max_ultrafly.gif

Good point, Max. “Damn, he’s ultra-fly!

Dustings of Woofle #20

If you’re feeling the holiday blues, I suggest you check in with Ellusionist’s kickstarter page for How to Be a Mentalist. Every time I go, I find something new to put a smile on my face.

I particularly like this part…

 “The breakdown of a reaction…

ptell.gif

Think about what it takes to put this kind of expression on someone’s face.  What does it TAKE?  See a pink elephant?  A car coming at you head-on?  Win the lottery?

Reactions like this will be the norm for you…. after you master a couple of the items in the kit.”

Who writes this gibberish? How out of touch with human emotions do you have to be when your best examples of situations when people cry are seeing a pink elephant or a car coming at them head on? Who starts sobbing when a car is coming their way? How evolutionarily ill-equipped would we be if—when facing imminent danger—we stood there and worked up a good cry? “Oh, woe is me! A car is coming my way! And here I sit… a blubbering old fool. Yes, just a mere quarter mile or so and it will all be over. Well you had a good run, old friend. [Sobs] I can’t believe this is the end! Any moment now. Oh… hold on… red light…. Ok, here he comes again. Awww…. why me god? Why? I’m so sad! So, incredibly sad about this car that’s going to hit me! Whyyyyyyy!!!!” [Splat.]

The funniest thing about this is that the set is marketed towards people who can’t even carry on a fucking conversation with other people. Now they’re suggesting these social maladroits should go and try and make people cry? “Hey, Tommy, remember when the pretty girl approached you and you suffered nerve-induced sphincter spasms causing a little piece of turd to shoot out of your butthole? Okay… well… uhm…forget all of that. Go over there and tell her to write down the name of a friend she hasn’t seen in a long time. And really turn the screws on her to get the waterworks going.”

That’s going to work out well.


One of the things I found myself thankful for yesterday was magic as a hobby. You can like playing basketball, or playing chess, or knitting, or home-brewing, or yoga, or model train collecting—but I can’t think of any other hobby where there is the promise of something new and potentially revolutionary multiple times a week. Every lecture you download, magic book/magazine you open, or trick you buy has the potential to bring something totally new into your experience of the hobby. If you like whittling, for example, I bet you seldom get that same anticipation or thrill. You’re probably not like, “Oh, the new whittling magazine came in the mail today! I can’t wait to see what unimaginable wonders it might describe!”

It’s probably more like, “Oh great, here are more articles about carving stuff out of wood.”


On the other hand, the promise of something new always around the corner is, I think, also something that keeps people from performing. They tell themselves that this next trick is going to really be the one that gets them out there showing people stuff. And they just keep telling themselves that.

If you’re fine not performing, then it’s nothing to worry about. But if you want to be showing people more stuff, it’s good to be aware of this trap. I know I’ve been caught in that cycle in the past of just constantly looking towards the next thing—passing up really good tricks in search of some elusive “perfect” trick to show people.


Here’s a 13 minute audio story from This American Life that was sent to me by T.C. earlier this year.

I’m not 100% sure what to make of it, but I think it shows that people’s appetite for the fantastic is far greater than we may think.


As someone who watches almost no magic on tv or online, I was surprised how much I liked this 20 minute “magic mixtape” from Justin Flom. I enjoyed it more than any magic I’ve seen on tv or online in a long time. I’m a little burnt out on watching people do proper “acts” on stage. And even the more casual stuff I see online just feels too staged for me to really take an interest in.. But this was neither of those things. It’s a well-edited collection of quick vignettes where, in the end, you really feel like you get some sense of who he is as a person and the lifestyle of someone with a life-long interest in magic.

And look, let’s be honest, he knows where his bread is buttered. He’s got that adorable little muppet of a daughter who appears throughout the video. Justin is no dummy. He’s getting all this cute stuff on tape now. It’s not going to be any good when she’s a gawky, brace-faced, 12-year-old who is completely embarrassed by his bullshit. In fact, I believe he and his wife are expecting another child. I’m guessing the plan is—when the new kid reaches prime cuteness in a couple years—to send this current one off to an orphanage. And likely they’ll just repeat that cycle every few years. Nothing wrong with that, that’s just savvy marketing. Look, don’t be so naive, it’s 2019. You don’t get on Pickler & Ben without shipping off a few kids to an orphanage when they get a little long in the tooth.

Bounty Hunting

With Thanksgiving coming tomorrow, I thought I’d completely ignore the spirit of the holiday and make a post asking for you to do something for me.

There are some ideas that I’ve had for a while that have hit a roadblock for one reason or another. After sitting on them for some time, I’ve decided to release the problem out to all of you and see if you have any thoughts. You may be able to direct me to something in the marketplace that meets my needs. Or you may come up with an idea that solves the problem for me. In which case, I’ll buy the idea off you. I’m putting a bounty on these ideas.

Bounty #1 - Screw Containers

They make these containers that are designed to hold beads or other small objects. They’re small containers, about the size of a large coin and about half of an inch deep. Only the top container has a lid, all the other ones screw into the bottom of the one above it, so you end up with a stack of little containers like this.

999_098N_12.jpg

I was trying to come up with a method where you would put a coin or other object in the top container of the stack, shake the stack, and it would fall down to the next container; shake it, and down to the next, and so on. Or maybe you just ask them to point to one of the layers, you shake it, and it goes directly to that container.

It doesn’t have to be a coin, it could be any small object. Or maybe even a liquid.

I’m looking for a method that would work in real life, that would hopefully hold up to some scrutiny. (Although if you come up with a camera-only version, I’d still find that interesting to see.)

Bounty #2 - 1 on 1 PK Touches [UPDATED]

This is something that might actually exist, so you may be able to help me out by just pointing me in the right direction. What I’m looking for is a PK touch routine that can be done with just one other person. What I mean is, we would turn on the spectators phone and have it record video of the two of us. I would have her close her eyes. Then I’d tell her to raise her hand when I touched her shoulder. I would touch my own shoulder and she would raise her arm. Of course the effect would only register when the person watches the video. In the moment, they would just assume they had been touched on the shoulder.

Does a method for this already exist? If not, I feel like one is within our grasp. Because it’s on video, there can’t be any timing discrepancy. They need to raise their hand when you touch your own shoulder. That would suggest maybe a mechanical method although I haven’t heard of one that’s any good.

I’m particularly interested in this because I have a really dope presentation chambered to use with this. I just need a method.

[Update: Thanks to those of you who brought Spectro Touch and Chi Touch to my attention. I'll take a look at those and see if they'll work for my purposes. Any other ideas are also welcome.]

Bounty #3 - Fortune Telling Machine [UPDATED]

Okay, so this would require someone with some fabrication skills. So someone with, like, a genuine skill, not the sort of person whose resume for the past five years is: “Primarily blogging about magic.”

In the Twilight Zone episode, The Nick Of Time, a young couple goes to a diner and on the table is this fortune telling machine(/ napkin dispenser?).

il_1588xN.1788809332_ohuv.jpg

You put in a coin, press a little lever, and it spits out a card that answers a yes/no question.

You can watch a 2-minute version of the episode here.

Now, I don’t want a replica of the Twilight Zone prop. They make those already and they’re going for like $1800 on ebay. But even if it was $50, I’m really not looking for something that’s designed to look like a prop from a tv show.

What I’d is something with the same functionality, but not designed to look like this somewhat well known tv prop. Something that looks like it could have sat on a diner table back in the 50s, that will give out a little business card sized slip when you insert a coin and press a lever.

That’s something I could build a routine around.

So if you have some idea how to make something like that, get in touch. And if you wanted to do a small limited edition run of them, I’d be happy to partner up with you and fund it and sell them .

[Update: Okay, so it turns out the Twilight Zone ones were based on actual napkin holders from the 50s (napkin holder technology is one of the few areas we’ve regressed in the past 75 years). These show up for sale from time to time on ebay, so that is likely to be an easier route to take than fabricating a new one to look old. So that is possibly/probably the direction I’ll go in. But if you have other ideas, feel free to send them along.]


Hey, if you’re celebrating Thanksgiving, have a great one. I’m thankful for my friends and my family. And you, dear reader. And, of course, I’m thankful for the same thing I’m thankful for every year.

giphy.gif

The Decision Maker

I’ve been sitting on this idea for nine months now. It comes from friend-of-the-site, Seth Raphael. It’s a very simple trick. In fact, it’s based on something that’s in a lot of beginner’s magic books. And honestly, it might not even be a trick depending on how you present it. It’s certainly not intended to be an incredible mind-blowing impossibility. But at the same time I think it could be very powerful in the right situation. And it has one of the most satisfying “outs” I’ve ever seen in magic.

I’ve been waiting to post about it because when I write up effects, I like to have an actual performance in mind to reference in my description. But I haven’t had a chance to show this to anyone yet because it requires a particular circumstance that I haven’t stumbled into in the past nine months. So rather than continuing to wait for that situation to arise, I figured I’d describe it here for you to keep in the back of your mind. It’s a simple, impromptu trick that you won’t have any issue remembering, and you’ll be able to slide ride into the trick should the opportunity present itself.

The trick is ideal for when you have a friend or loved-one who is having a hard time making a choice between a handful of options. It’s designed to help them choose, or give them some clarity. The reason why I haven’t had the chance to perform this yet is because for it to work best, the decision they’re making has to be one that:

A) Has more than two options, but
B) Doesn’t have too many options, and
C) Is a significant decision in some way. (It doesn’t really make sense to do this if the choice is about, “What type of cereal should I buy?”)

So, let’s imagine I’m talking to someone who is having a hard time deciding what college to go to. She has scholarship offers from four different schools. One is a film school, which is her passion. Another is one of the best business schools in the country, which she realizes would provide her with a much more practical degree. Another is close to home where she has a lot of ties. And the final one is a great school that’s in a part of the country she’s dreamed about living for years.

So she’s someone who is facing a decision that is pulling her in a few different directions. I would offer to help her out. I might just say, “Hey, do you want to try a decision making technique I’ve read about?”

Or perhaps I’d give her a more detailed backstory about, “an old decision making process that I read about in this weird self-help book from the 60s that I picked up at a used book store a few years ago. It’s supposed to help you focus in on the right choice for you when you’re facing this kind of decision. A lot of people swear by it. But I think it fell out of favor because the book came from this group whose goal was to ‘maximize human potential’… I’m forgetting the name… but apparently part of the group spun off later to form the Heaven’s Gate cult. So… you know… some of those ideas are frowned upon.”

  • Regardless of how you frame it, this is the sort of thing no one ever says no to. So the next step would be to gather the objects for the procedure.

  • A pad or slips of paper

  • Something to write with

  • A lighter or candle and a plate or ashtray. (You need some way to dispose of the small slips of paper. You could use a toilet, but it sort of lacks the romanticism of a flame.)

So on four slips of paper I’d write down the name of each college she was considering (one college per slip). These would be folded up and jumbled around and placed in her pocket.

Then I’d walk her through the procedure.

Imagine

“Okay, first, close your eyes. Now, one at a time, I want you to imagine what it would feel like right now if you made the decision to attend each school. So imagine you chose [School 1]. Imagine how that would feel to make that decision as we sit here now…. Okay, now imagine that with [School 2].” And we’d continue on with all four schools.

“Now reach into your pocket and remove one of those slips.”

She would take out a slip and give it to me, and I would set it on fire, burning it to ashes.

“Now we’re going to do the same thing. But this time I want you to imagine yourself at each school, looking back on your decision to attend that school. So think of [School 1], picture yourself there. Think about how you feel about your decision to attend.”

We would do that with the rest of the schools as well. She’d imagine herself at each school and the feeling of having made the decision to attend that school.

I’d have her hand me a second slip and we’d burn it.

“Now this time I want you to picture yourself 20 years in the future. I want you to imagine how it would feel to have made the decision to attend each of those schools, looking back in hindsight. Accept all the feelings you feel about each choice; the good and the bad.”

Again, I would walk her through each school and she would imagine looking back 20 years on a decision she has not yet made.

She would take out another slip and we’d burn that one too.

I’d tell her to take out the remaining slip and hold it in her fist.

“Okay. So here’s how it should work. In the first round we should have burnt the school that even as of now, you already know isn’t a good choice for you. Next we should have eliminated the school you would realize wasn’t right for you while you were attending there. And finally we should have burned the school that, looking back 20 years, you would recognize wasn’t the best decision to make.

“That leaves the best choice in your hand. Now… take a deep breath. I’m going to ask you a question and I want you to tell me the first answer that comes to mind. Ready? Ok. What school do you want to see on that slip of paper?”

Let’s say she says, “NYU.”

I would tell her to open up the slip and take a look and she’d see it said, “New York University.” She has an answer.

Method

This comes from that old trick you would find in a beginner’s book like Magic for Dummies, or the seldom remembered (due to the fact it was quickly pulled by the publisher), Mark Wilson’s Motherfucking BIG-ASS Book of Magic.

In that version of the trick you might ask someone to name different vegetables and you would write each one on a slip of paper and then predict which slip they would choose. The method is either to just write the first thing they say on each slip, or write “Carrot” over and over and keep asking for vegetable at least until the point they say carrot.

Either way you have a bunch of identical slips that the spectator assumes say something different. The select one and you’ve predicted it or you read their mind.

It’s a perfectly fine trick for beginners.

Here we’re shifting the focus off the performer and calling it some sort of decision making tool or ritual.

On each of the four slips you will write down the option that you feel the person most wants or is leaning toward, but is perhaps scared of in some way. How will you know which one that is? By being tuned in and making an educated guess. Sometimes it will be obvious. Sometimes you’ll have to pay a little more attention. Which option do they bring up first, or talk about the most? That’s likely to be one in which they’re most interested. I would suspect that most of the time, you’ll have a good idea what they really want. But if you have to, just guess. You’ll see why it doesn’t matter in the next section (The Out).

You’ll modify the elimination procedure based on the choice they’re making and the number of options they have. I think the general outline I’ve given above would be good. Have them imagine making each choice and then looking back on it at different stages in their life. You could add a couple more stages. Or have them eliminate one item at random. Or whatever. Any way to get them down to one final item.

Someone will write me and say, “You’re going to use a magic trick to influence someone’s life-changing decision, like which college to attend? That’s reprehensible!” Okay… chill-out, dude. First off, regardless of what decision they’re making, I wouldn’t frame it like it’s the oracle at Delphi providing divine answers to any question. I would just present it as something I read about. A tool that some people believe helps them get some clarity when dealing with a choice. And that’s completely fair because that is exactly what it fucking is.

This doesn’t force them to the option I want them to have. It brings them to their own conclusion of which option they are most drawn to after thinking about the choice and how they would feel about it not just now, but as time passes. This seems like exactly what someone should be considering when making a choice. The fact that the final slip matches that choice would just be a final nudge in that direction. But it’s essentially the exact same nudge as if I said, ‘Don’t torture yourself with the decision. Take some time to carefully consider each option, and the long-term repercussions of each choice, then trust your judgment and go forward with the choice that feels right. Don’t continually second-guess it.”

The Out

But what if it doesn’t work?

It always works.

No, but what if they say something other than what’s on the slip in their hand?"

Oh, that’s easy.

Let’s go back and see how that would play out. All the slips have NYU on them, my friend is holding the final slip in her hand.

“Now… take a deep breath. I’m going to ask you a question and I want you to tell me the first answer that comes to mind. Ready? Ok. What school do you want to see on that slip of paper?”

She responds, “Pepperdine.”

I would nod and take that final piece of paper her from her.

And set it on fire.

She is bound to question why I did that. She will have wanted to see the school on the final slip. Why did I burn it?

I would say, “Because that’s the ritual. [Or, “Because that’s the technique."] You expected the slips and the fire to tell you something. And that freed up your mine to come to its own conclusion without feeling the pressure of the decision. After considering all the options from various perspectives, you hoped to see Pepperdine on that piece of paper. I think that’s your answer.”

This is a perfect “out.” You don’t introduce it as a magic trick, so it doesn’t matter if there’s not a climax. And it’s perfectly logical as well. The process itself is valuable to help the person achieve some insight. And maybe help them out if they’re the indecisive type, which is a character trait that doesn’t do anyone any good.

History

In February, Seth wrote me an email that said:

“When your friend is having a hard time choosing between several different options in their life.... Write each option on a piece of paper and put it in a satchel which you give them. Tell them not to open it.

Over the next 5 days you call and give them instructions on how to pick one and destroy it.

On day six, you have them take out the last option and hold it. Before they open it you ask them which option they hope is left. They open the paper. It matches the slip they are holding.”

I thought that was a nice use for that old methodology, but it was when he explained the out that I thought it was really genius. I fleshed it out/modified it to what you see above.

I love magic tricks that play out over a long time, but I don’t trust my friends to walk away with the slips and do it over the course of days. (It may work for you. You know your friends better than I.) I would do it over the course of an evening, or in one concentrated interaction as described above.

So thanks to Seth for sending that my way and allowing me to share it with you.

Also, if you’re interested in a similar (thought also quite different) sort of trick, done under much more impossible conditions, check out Seth’s newest release at AFGMT.com.

I haven’t used that trick myself, because it’s not really designed for someone who performs for friends/family, but it may work for your performing situations. I’m pretty sure it would have fooled me.

Dear Jerxy: Defining Reality

DearJerxy.jpg

Dear Jerxy: In the early days of your site you often made disparaging comments about magicians or mentalists who tried to pass themselves off as the “real thing.” More recently it seems like you’re trying to do the same sort of thing. For instance, in your posts on the subject of failure, it seems like the idea was to use failure to make people really believe there is something “magical” or “impossible” happening. What caused the change of heart?

Sincerely,
What’s Real And What’s Not?

Dear WRAWN: I’ve tried to explain this in the past, but perhaps not completely clearly. I don’t believe I’ve had a “change of heart,” about this subject as you put it. I’ve just been perhaps focusing on it from different perspectives.

I still think there’s something wrong with you if you want your performance to be seen as a demonstration of real powers. It seems like a character flaw—or at the very least incredibly low self-esteem—to want someone to truly believe you have skills or abilities which you know you’re faking.

Let’s look at mentalism specifically, as that is where you are more likely to find someone suggesting what they’re doing is real. Not many people are saying, “I actually have the power to make this rope lift up when this other rope on a completely different ‘chinese stick’ is pulled.”

“Bear witness, my child, to your new God’s terrifying powers!”

“Bear witness, my child, to your new God’s terrifying powers!”

I can understand the desire to want people to believe you’re great at mentalism (that is, the art of pretending to read people’s minds). I can’t understand the desire to want people to actually believe you can read minds. Especially if you’re performing socially. I think it may come down to something I wrote about in the last post: the difference between a goal of recognition vs. connection. Claiming to have genuine powers you don’t really possess may be a way to get recognition, but it will create a barrier to connection.


But what about all the effort I put into getting people to feel like genuinely impossible things are actually occurring? If I don’t want people to think it’s real, then why bother with that?

Here is my logic… consider these two scenarios:

1. You put up a video on YouTube that has been edited flawlessly in such a way that it makes it seem like you made 1000-free throws in a row. And you tell everyone this is a real feat you accomplished.

2. You put up a video taken by a drone of you shooting a basket from one edge of town to a hoop a mile and a half away. And you put a bunch of effort into making the video unimpeachable. There is no indication of any editing. Other than the fact that it’s completely impossible, it looks 100% real. And you never imply that it’s not real. The video description says, “It took 14 tries, but I finally hit this shot.”

In the first case I would consider you a pathetic weirdo, in the second I would see you as an artist working in the medium of the impossible. I don’t have an issue with a performer who puts a lot of effort into getting people to feel as if something everyone knows is impossible is actually real. To me that’s a very worthwhile endeavor that doesn’t seem manipulative in any destructive way. I discuss this more in the post Feeling and Belief.


Perhaps if you saw me perform a single piece of mentalism in a vacuum, you might think, “Hey, he’s really trying to get them to believe he has the power to read their mind.” But performing socially usually means performing for people who aren’t seeing one trick in a vacuum. They’ve seen a number of tricks over time. And taken as a whole they understand the nature of what they’re seeing. They’re unlikely to think, “Well, there was the time he showed me a trick about a ghost dog who cut the deck to my card, and then there was the time he turned a red sponge ball into a red sponge cock, but now here… where he’s saying he’s reading my mind… you know, I think he’s really doing it!”

The people I perform for regularly are expecting fiction. Hopefully it’s one that they get carried away by to a certain extent, but I’m not trying to seriously reframe reality.

And if I’m performing for someone who doesn’t know quite what to expect, then I make it clear from the start what I’m claiming my abilities are. It’s very satisfying for me to say, “This is fake,” and have it feel very real to them.


Here’s where it might get confusing.

Yes, I want to establish the basic understanding that my interest is in magic and tricks, and that I’m not claiming any actual supernatural powers or anything like that, and that the things they’re taking part in are fiction.

However, once that has been established, I figure, screw it, everything else is now fair game.

So then I include a number of presentational elements that are designed to intrigue the audience and muddy the waters and add some mystery back into this thing I’ve told you was completely fake. There might be intriguing failures, or weird repercussions to a trick. There might be a story about how I learned the trick or a technique that’s used that seems fantastical, but also perhaps somewhat plausible. Are we really texting some world-class magician? Am I really a part of some secret society? Do I really have a headache? Was that really just a coincidence? And so on, and so on, and so on.

The way I think of it is like a good Halloween haunted house attraction. You pay your admission fee and in your mind you know this is a fake haunted house that they built for the month of October, yet they still can instill genuine fear in you. Somehow your mind is capable of both knowing it’s fake and being scared for your life simultaneously. Likewise, I want the people I perform for to know deep-down that it’s a trick, but despite that have I want them to feel genuine wonder and mystery at the same time.

.