Senses Working Overtime

I'll get the secret out of the way here. This routine uses a stacked and marked deck. With that information you will be able to follow along with what's going on as I describe the effect. If you don't know a stack, then The Code deck, by Andy Nyman, would be ideal for this effect as well.

The trick is a little to me-centric for my tastes these days, but it's a very fun trick to perform and it might be of some interest to you.

You're talking with your friend and you mention some things you're working on in regards to magic and mindreading. At some point you bring up the concept of "using my five senses to mimic a sixth sense." You offer to demonstrate some of the exercises you've been doing to work on increasing your sensitivity to sensory input. 

There is a deck of cards on the table. 

You go into another room or stand in the corner Blair Witch-style. You ask your friend to take the deck, cut a portion of cards off of it, and toss those cards under one of the couch cushions. You then have her cut off another portion of cards and set it on the table. "Take the card on top of what's left in your hand—the card you just cut to—and put it in your shirt-pocket or in your bra or somewhere close to you where I can't see it." You then instruct her to place the cards that are left into the card box. 

You turn around or come back in the room. 

You take a seat on the couch, look up for a moment as if thinking about something, then write a few words on a piece of paper, fold it up, and place the note on the couch.

"Okay," you say, "the first sense you learn to exercise is vision. There are a number of physical exercises for the eyes. And there are also techniques that you practice to take in large quantities of information in a brief amount of time. Like in Rain Man when Dustin Hoffman counts the toothpicks."

Your 26-year-old friend has no idea what you're talking about and makes you feel old.

"Anyways," you say, "where is the second packet you cut off?" She points to the packet on the table. You ask her to pick it up and hold it between her thumb and first finger. You walk around the packet from a distance giving it a brief look all around.

"I think there are 17 cards there," you say.

She counts the cards and there are 17.

You talk for a moment about exercising your hearing. You ask the spectator to shake the card case with its cards inside. You listen intently. "I think there are 11...no... 10 cards in there." She counts the cards and you are correct. 

"Knowing how many cards are in both of those packets, it would be pretty easy for me to now tell you how many are under that cushion that I was sitting on a moment ago. I would just subtract the number of cards in those piles plus the one in your pocket from 52. Yes, it would be easy for me to tell you that now when we've counted these packets. But when I first came back here, and I had no information to go on—I didn't know if you had put 2 cards under the cushion or 40—I made a note on that piece of paper. Go check it."

She opens the note and it says, I'm sitting on 24 cards. She counts the cards under the cushion just to double check, and you were correct from the start. 

You have her reassemble the deck. With your back turned she removes the card from her pocket, reminds herself of its identity, and shuffles it into the deck. 

You spread the deck face-down on the table. You subtly sniff your way around the cards. Just short, rapid inhales through your nose, don't be gross about it. You start pushing cards away until you've narrowed it down to one card. You ask what card she had in her pocket. She says the three of hearts, you turn the card over and it's the three of hearts.


As I said, it should be obvious, but briefly here's what's happening:

1. When you come back into the room you note the top card of the stack on the table. One less than that cards stack number is how many cards are under the cushion. You write that on the piece of paper.

2. When you are circling the packet the spectator holds to test your vision, you note the bottom card of that packet. That's the key that unlocks everything else. You now know how many cards are in the "visual" packet (that card's stack number minus the number of cards under the couch cushion). You know the card that's in her pocket (the next one in the stack after the one you just glimpsed). And you know how many cards are in the "audio" packet. (Subtract the stack position of the card you just glimpsed from 51. (51 because one card is in her pocket.))

The rest is just acting and having fun.


I performed this effect probably 6 or so times before I retired it. And I think every time I did, the spectator asked about taste. Now, you could routine in another effect where you figure something out via taste, but that just makes it slightly too long, in my opinion. Instead I suggest you have some sort of joke or bit planned since it's probably going to come up.

I hesitate to say what I did because it's not a good idea for most performers, but it worked for me and the people I performed for. They would say, "What about taste? Do you use that sense in magic?"

"Yes, indeed I do. Here... I want you to think of any emotion at all. And don't just think of the emotion, but also think of a time you felt it strongly. Do you have an emotion in mind? Concentrate... concentrate... I want to see if I can pick up on the emotion you're feeling. You're concentrating, yes?"

They'd agree and I would grab their head in my hands and quickly and sloppily lick up the side of their face like a dog.

As they said, "Ugh!" and wiped my saliva off with their sleeve, I would click my tongue against the roof of my mouth as if I was evaluating the taste of a wine or something.

"Yes... yes... it's coming through. The emotion is very strong. You're...hmmm... yes, you're totally disgusted!"

They would have to admit my powers proved correct.

I only did this with old friends (both male and female) or newer friends who had indicated they didn't have an issue with me licking other parts of their body (if you catch my drift), so I knew it wasn't a complete invasion of their personal space. Is it gross? Yes, that's the idea. But it's more funny than gross with a close friend, so long as you have good oral hygiene. "Well, Andy, I don't think it's funny at all. If you licked my face we would have a serious problem." Well, guess what, you fucking lame-o, YOU'RE NOT THE TYPE OF PERSON I WOULD HANG OUT WITH. So it's not an issue.

Gardyloo #13

Thanks to Jonah Babins over at the Discourse in Magic blog for his very kind write-up about his picks for the top 5 posts on this blog. 


Although it was far too brief, we were fortunate to have Krystyn Lambert grace magic with her style, energy, and talent for the time that she did. She will be missed.

I hope I'm not jumping to conclusions. But based on her latest Instagram post, I'm expecting us to find (what remains of) her body washed ashore on the beach, in a dumpster, or plugging up some valve at a wastewater treatment plant sometime soon.


Book buyers: I expect The Jerx, Volume One to be shipped to you in approximately two weeks.


Oh, my babies, Daddy needs to get himself a copy of this book: Tricks to Pick Up Chicks. As I've stated before, this is my favorite sub-genre of magic. Take the social awkwardness of your typical magician and combine it with the desperation of your garden-variety pick-up artist and you create an ultra-loser science couldn't hope to build in the lab. The Six Million Dollar Creep.

I'm not against using magic in a manner that may intensify someone's initial interest or attraction. Hell, I'm not even against magic that has overtly sexual elements to it. (Those of you who accumulate the Jerx Points to receive the 20 for 20 book will find an effect in there that involves you sliding a finger into one of your spectator's orifices (your choice). It's about as intimate an effect as there is. But I wouldn't perform it for someone who doesn't already let you put a finger there.) But the way to perform magic to "pick up chicks" is just to do good magic like a normal human. It's the same way you utilize any talent to attract someone—do it effortlessly and really well and not in a creepy off-putting way.

But... maybe I'm wrong? The first effect in this book, as seen in the preview, has me questioning my thought process.

Now, I'm not quite sure how this translates into you picking up the chick. I guess what happens is she sucks on the straw so hard she develops a cerebral aneurysm, and, when it ruptures, her brain is damaged to the point where she finds a loser like you charming?

I guess I'll give it a shot. What do I have to lose? I'm sure she'll be into it. If there's one thing I know about women it's that they love it when a stranger messes around with their drink.


This is going to be a full week of posts. After today, all the posts are somewhat inter-related. We start tomorrow with an older effect of mine called Senses Working Overtime. I don't really do it anymore, but some of you might like it. And it leads into some other things I want to write about later in the week. 

Two Degrees of Separation

Dan Harlan sports his GLOMM elite shirt in the newest download of the Tarbell series over on Penguin. Once Dan is done with the Tarbell project he's going to do "Every Trick on the Blog" from this site as his next long-term download series. (That's a lie.)

I am now two degrees of separation from Harlan Tarbell. The GLOMM has really made inroads in just the two months that it has existed.

Hard to believe the Global League of Magicians and Mentalists is the ONLY magic organization that—as a rule—kicks out sex criminals. Apparently the IBM and SAM think it's just fine to diddle the younger generation. Look at the Code of Ethics for the IBM and SAM. Anything on there about not raping, torturing, and murdering nursing students? Nope. Well, welcome to the IBM, Richard Speck. You're in the clear. Just don't put your dove in too tight a harness.

This is also a good time to announce that while the grey Elite Member shirt will be the standard ones available going forward, the 2016 Secret Hyper-Elite Platinum Membership shirt (the red one) will not be reprinted. It will be a limited edition. As of this moment, all sizes are currently in stock, but only a few of each size, so if you want one don't dilly-dally. Get your membership kit soon.

Pastiches

This is a follow-up to the In Search Of Lost Time presentation from last Friday. 

It perhaps goes without mentioning, but you can use this same structure for a variety of tricks. It may be potentially more surreal and bizarre with other tricks, and that may be good or bad depending on what you're going for, but it's worth thinking about. 

I'll describe a quick variation on Version 1 and you can extrapolate from there. 

You have your two friends, Bonnie and Stoogey O'Stoogeson. One of them is a stooge. In this case it's Bonnie, oddly enough. No. That will be too confusing. Okay, Stoogey is your stooge. 

You go through the process of "hypnotizing" Stoogey and you say that when he awakes and you say some trigger word he will see the dollar bill on the table start to float, and that he will remember nothing of this hypnotism process.

You "awaken" your friend and say the trigger word. The dollar bill doesn't move, but he reacts as if it's floating. (Tell him not to go too crazy. That will come off as fake.)

Then you offer to do it with your other spectator. You do the fake induction, lost time, reawakening bit, i.e. "As I count back from three you're going to fall into a deep state of sleep: three, two, one.... Two. Three. Open your eyes. You are now fully awake,"

You then say a sentence with some random trigger word in it like, "So, Bonnie, how was it being hypnotized? Did it make you hungry for... cantaloupe?" And after you say that, the dollar bill starts floating for real, but you and your other friend act as if you're not seeing it. 

This may come across as more jokey than the original version. I don't know. I haven't done it. But I think it, or any other variation will definitely be interesting.

And it would be funny if, three months later, you're out getting dinner with Bonnie and another friend, say Laura. And you've pulled Laura aside to give her some instructions. And at the end of the meal Laura says, "That was good. You know what I'm really in the mood for? Cantaloupe." And one of the bills from the tip on the table starts floating but you and Laura act as if nothings happening.


After the book release when things have settled down a little, I will be recording a video to use with Version Two of the effect and I will be putting it up online for anyone to use. 

That way you'll always be prepared to do it, as long as you have an invisible deck.

In this case you'll just say you saw this trick online and you'll watch the video with your spectator. Then you'll ask if you can try it on them. 


And finally, you can flip In Search of Lost Time around and it will play as something of an awful joke. This idea is courtesy of The Other Brothers, Darryl Davis and Daryl Williams.

You do this one on one with a girl. And you do the second part first. That is to say, you offer to hypnotize her, do the immediate countdown and back up. Ask her what she remembers from the time she was hypnotized. She'll have no idea what you're talking about. She'll think no time has passed (because it hasn't, of course). You ask her to name the first card that comes to mind, then you show her that card reversed in the deck. "I hypnotized you to name that card," you say.

She will be skeptical at best.

You insist you did. You tell her she was hypnotized for almost ten minutes. She won't believe you.

"Dammit. I should have recorded it like I did the last time," you say.

"I swear that's how the trick is done. A hypnotic suggestion. Look, I'll show you a video of me doing it yesterday."

She watches the video on your phone. This time you are sitting across from a different woman, giving the same induction you gave your friend. But when this woman is "asleep" you instruct her to name the four of hearts when she awakes. You also instruct her that when she awakes she will remember nothing of what happened while she was under. You repeat over and over, "You won't remember any of this. You won't remember any of this." And you shift your chair over to hers, slide your hand down her pants, and finger-bang her to a rousing orgasm. After that you wake her up and reveal the card. 

When your spectator looks up from the video, wondering if she has been the latest victim of your hypnotic fingerfuck-fest, she sees you inhaling the aroma deeply from your fingertips.

Screen Shot 2016-08-24 at 3.04.45 AM.png

Start Your Adventure!

Look at me, putting together the baggies that contain a couple of the props that go along with effects from The Jerx, Volume One. I'm a little cutie. 

I'm pretty psyched for you guys to get the book. The last I heard from the publishing company, the books should be arriving at my friend's place in upstate New York in early September. I will be driving up there from Pennsylvania at the same time to rendezvous with my friend (who is helping with the packing and shipping) and the books. Then I'll spend a few days getting everything ready to go. Then the books should start arriving in your mailboxes a few days after that. (In the US, at least. Hopefully not too much longer for international orders.)

I will be sending out an email soon to everyone who ordered the book. The email will link to a form that will ask you to verify the address I have for you, and it will ask you if you want me to inscribe the book, and... I think that's it. I won't be sending your book until you respond to that email. So don't dilly-dally. (But at the same time, don't jump the gun and send me an email now about that stuff. I'm trying to keep everything organized.)

Also, book buyers will be sent a link to a password protected page on this site that's going to have some supplementary information and may eventually have any additions/updates to the material in the book.

And, you'll be getting an ebook soon that describes a few other effects that use the functionality that's coming to the Jerx app, other than the effect in the book. This will be sent out when the new version of the app is released, which will coincide with when people start getting the book. I'll send it to everyone who ordered the book, even those of you who didn't request the app itself. It might make you say, "Fuck it, I'm getting an iPhone."

TweAK-47

This is a post for people who have John Bannon's book Destination Zero or his new DVD/download Move Zero (Volume 2), it won't make sense if you don't. I, like everyone, think that Bannon is a brilliant thinker and creator of effects. There is an trick that can be found in that book and on that download called AK-47. This effect is in keeping with that brilliance he is known for. A spectator shuffles a deck of cards and then thinks of any card in the deck. With hardly any process you are able to show you know what card they were thinking of. It's great.

But... I never did it because it had one of my least favorite forms of equivoque in it. 

"It's not a black card, is it?"

I've gone into the specifics of why I don't like this kind of equivoque here. But basically my rationale is that it sounds equivocal. It doesn't sound like a definitive statement. And that's exactly what you don't want at the moment you're making the claim to know something you couldn't know. 

This sort of equivoque usually gets a laugh, because it sounds like a joke. It doesn't sound like someone who knows what they're claiming to know. 

Anyway, I've worked that line out of the effect and now you can too. The statement I've substituted in is one that will be completely correct or be seen as a bit of a joke, but it will never be seen as you fishing for information.

Here's how it works. You're at the point where you've just put the card down in front of the spectator. 

You say: "I think it's pretty obvious. You're thinking of a black card."

Path A: If they say, "yes," you've just nailed the color of a freely thought of card with no questions and you can complete the effect as in the original by determining their card without asking a single question. This replaces a potentially weak spot in the original where it might feel like you're guessing the color and then you have to go back to the deck and swap your prediction card.

Path B: If they say, "no," you say this, "Aww, jeeze. What a blunder. I should be embarrassed. " And you hang your head in a phony, overly dramatic/dejected way. "But I'm not," you say, and slowly lift your head. "Because I know something you don't know." Then you smile, lean in and say softly, "I'm not thinking of a black card either." With the tip of your finger you tap the back of the card on the table.

You see? Now you can complete the effect from there and it doesn't come off as a "miss." It comes off as a bit of showmanship to add drama to things. It couldn't possibly be a miss because you say this after you've already committed to the card on the table and that card never leaves their sight. So clearly you're just toying with them. 

In fact, Path B is similar structurally to a lot of moments we intentionally include in our magic. We act like we're wrong when really our isolated prediction indicates we're right. 

If you have no problem with the statement, "It wasn't a black card, was it?" If you think that comes off as a "hit," then you might not feel this is a significant change. But in my opinion, it's a big improvement and eliminates the weak part of an otherwise strong trick. This is an example of the 3rd Wave equivoque style (as delineated on this site and in the book) where it's based on seemingly definitive statements rather than unclear words or actions, and the two paths you follow are not complements to each other (so one path doesn't immediately suggest the other).

In Search of Lost Time

In Search of Lost Time is the presentation I've been working on for the Invisible Deck.

First and foremost I want to thank Cristian Scaramella for writing in with his similar presentation for a different effect. When I read it, I knew it was a great idea, but I also knew it wouldn't suit me for a couple different reasons. So I changed a couple elements and it evolved further and further into something that is quite similar to his original idea, but quite different as well. I think you will like it, and I think Cristian will like to see how it has evolved. A brief description of his original idea will be at the end of this post.

There are three variations on the effect that follow. Don't be turned off by the first version. It requires a stooge. I'm including it here because it was my first idea as far as this plot goes and I want you to be able to track the progression through the second and third version. I'm also including it because it is a fun version to perform if you have the right person with you to pull it off. 

Version One - Swann's Way

Imagine

You're sitting at the table with two friends. We'll call one Mary and the other one Bob. 

You're on the subject of magic, or perception, or hypnosis, or the mind, or whatever. And you offer to show them something. 

"A lot of what we think of as 'magic tricks' are just demonstrations of hypnosis but reframed to seem like a trick. Watch... Bob, I'm going to show you a trick and Mary you'll see how it's all done."

You place your hand on Bob's forehead.

"Bob, I want you to close your eyes. And as I count back from three you're going to fall into a deep state of sleep: three, two, one. Okay, Bob, just keep breathing normally and remain in this deep state of sleep.  In your mind I want you to imagine descending a staircase. You go down step by step by step by step. You keep going down, deeper and deeper. You are now in a deep recess of your mind... you can think of it as a 'random' part of your brain. At the bottom of the staircase there is a card on the ground. You pick up the card and it is the four of hearts. Do you understand? The four of hearts. Now, if anyone ever says to you, 'I want you to name any card. The first one that comes to your mind at random.' You are going to say the four of hearts."

During this monologue you remove a deck of cards from its case, take the four of hearts from the face, turn it upside-down, and slide it into the middle of the deck, making it clear to Mary what is going on.

"In a moment I'm going to wake you from your sleep. You will not remember anything I just said to you. You will awake feeling rested and as if you had just shut your eyes a moment ago. You will remember none of the directions I have just given you on a conscious level. Only as I count up from three will you start to remember the things I say. One. Two. Three. Open your eyes. You are now fully awake."

"How do you feel?" you ask.

"Uhm... fine," Bob says.

"Was the process comfortable for you?" you ask.

"You mean the two seconds I had my eyes closed? Yeah, it was fine," Bob says, slightly confused.

"Okay, great. Now Bob, I have a deck of cards here. I'd like you to name any card in the deck. Just any random card you can think of. Just name the first one that pops into your mind."

"Uh... I don't know... the four of hearts."

You give Mary a knowing look. 

"Bob, before we met up today I put one card reversed in this deck. Would you be amazed if it was the four of hearts?"

He says he would be. You spread through the deck to reveal the four of hearts.

"Holy shit!" Bob says. "There is no way. That was a completely random choice. That's crazy."

You look at Mary. "You see?" She gleefully reacts to Bob's amazement. 

"That's just not possible," Bob says to himself as you put the deck back in the case.

Okay, let's pause this description. Bob, as I mentioned, is a stooge, his reactions are all phony. But do you see where we are here? It's a beautiful position because now you say, "Mary, let's try it with you so we can show Bob what happened. We won't use the four of hearts. We'll use something different."

You place your hand on Mary's forehead.

"Mary, I want you to close your eyes. And as I count back from three you're going to fall into a deep state of sleep: three, two, one."

You take a one second pause and immediately you say, "Two. Three. Open your eyes. You are now fully awake.

This will be a very strange moment for Mary. Did you really just do the same thing you did with Bob, or are you screwing around in some way? Now you're going to lay the hammer down and really screw with her mind.

"Now Mary, I have a deck of cards here. I'd like you to name any card in the deck. Just any random card you can think of. Just name the first one that pops into your mind."

She names a card and you show her that yes, that was the card you had reversed in the deck and hypnotically planted in her mind.

What I love about this:

  • I love that you tell them you're going to show them a "demonstration of hypnosis but reframed to seem like a trick." When really you're showing them a trick reframed to seem like hypnosis.
  • I love an explanation that is crazier than the trick itself.
  • I love the feeling it gives the spectator of actually having lost a minute or so of time, in a way more concrete than any real hypnosis ever could.
  • I love how much fun it is for the stooge. Most of the time a stooge is used to make you look better. But here a stooge is used to establish a false reality in which you expose a trick. And the people who have played that role have really enjoyed messing with the spectator in that way.

Five things:

  1. Here's how to set this up. Take your invisible deck in your hand, oriented so the first card you'll use with your stooge is face down in the deck (the four of hearts, in this case). Spread through the deck, remove that card, and place it face up on top of the deck. So it is opposite of its normal orientation in the deck and not with its rough/smooth partner card. Put the deck in the case. When you run through the effect with the stooge you will remove the deck from the case, take the top card (4H) and apparently put it face down in a face-up deck. In reality you're putting it back in its place in the invisible deck. This is all just an act so the spectator can have some sense of what happened when her eyes are closed later on.
  2. It's better if there's not a clock in direct line of sight for the spectator. You want her to not have any way of knowing how much time has truly passed.
  3. Don't do anything close to a real hypnotic induction. You want it to feel like there's no way you could have really hypnotized your spectator just by counting down from three.
  4. You have to make it clear you're going to be using an entirely different card. You don't want her to say the four of hearts too just because she thinks that's what was expected of her.
  5. If you want to add an extra little element, you can have your stooge get a sandwich or a big glass of beer or something. Then, in the two seconds your spectator has her eyes closed, your stooge quickly and quietly discards 90% of this sandwich or chugs most of his beer. So when she opens her eyes again, there is a subtle suggestion that more time has passed. At the very least have him change his position in his chair.

Version Two: In the Shadow of Young Girls in Flower

I love that presentation. But I wanted to be able to do it without a stooge. Not just without a stooge, but one on one with a person.

Well, you don't really need a stooge. All you need to do is establish in your spectator's mind what the baseline effect is. 

So this is how it can play out one-on-one, no stooge.

You and your spectator are talking. Perhaps you've just met. She's asking you what you do for a living or what your interests are. You throw out a bunch of jargon about psychology, influence, hypnotic suggestion—a bunch of words that might capture her attention. You tell her you study that sort of thing (as either part of your profession or a hobby).

"Would you like to see the type of stuff I do?" you ask.

She quickly says yes. Why wouldn't she? This sounds pretty interesting.

You take out your phone and show her a video. It's you and another person and you essentially have the same interaction that you do with the stooge in version 1. 

When it's over your new friend will think about what she just watched. "Hmm... that's interesting," she'll say.

"Actually," you say, searching through your bag. "I have a deck of cards here. Would you like to try that same experiment?"

In my limited experience, she will happily agree. You see, when you offered to show her what you do, she was a little excited to see something interesting. Showing her the video, instead of something in the here and now was a bit of a letdown, even if it's a somewhat interesting subject. So when you offer to do it in real life, with her as the subject, it's very intriguing.

Then you just complete the performance as in version one. 

So in this version you just need to have that video on your phone. So, I guess technically it does use a stooge. But you just need him once and you can perform this over and over.

Version Three: The Past Recaptured

This version might be my favorite. It doesn't require a stooge or a pre-recorded video on your phone.

You do need to have your phone (or something that records video), but most people have that on them at all times anyway. Other than that, all you need is an invisible deck.

What I find so delightful about this version is that the spectator plays the role of the stooge and the mark. It's almost an instant stooge trick for one person.

Here's how it works. You ask your friend if they can help you out with something.

"I'm submitting a trick to a magazine. They want to see what it looks like on video first before they know if they'll accept it. Will you be my spectator for the sake of the video?" (You could also say it's an audition video for a tv show or whatever you want.)

You then go on to tell her that you're going to need her to fake her reaction. That you're just going to pretend to hypnotize her instead of using the real hypnotic induction process you've come up with.  "If I go through the real process in the video, they'll just take it from me and not give me the credit, so I'm only going to show them part of it," you say. (Alternatively, if you say it's an audition video you could say it needs to be under 2 mins but the "real" induction technique takes 5 minutes. So you're just going to fake it for the video.)

So you stooge her and tell her what to say and do. Then you record that video.

You scan through it with her when you're done to see if it looks alright, and then you say, "Hey, can I try it with you for real?"

Now you do the second half of the trick as described in version one. She herself has taken part in establishing the false narrative of what the baseline effect is. And then she is fooled by what happens. In a way she takes part in fooling herself. It's a totally great moment.


You can even take this one step further. Imagine you do version three for someone, we'll call her Amanda. So you do version three for Amanda and she's completely amazed by it. Then at some point down the road, you show version two to a mutual friend (we'll call her Nicole) using Amanda's video for the first part of the effect. So Nicole sees a video of how the trick played out with Amanda (but she doesn't know it's a "fake" version). Then she gets fooled by the effect. So now if Nicole and Amanda talk they will both be like, "Oh my god. That was so weird!" And Amanda will be talking about the second go-around, non-video-recorded version. But Nicole will be assuming she's talking about the video she watched, the stooged-version that she has no idea is a stooged version. Which will reinforce with her that there really was a chunk of time lost when you performed it for her because the same thing happened to her friend and she saw the video of that encounter. (Or so she thinks.) And even if Amanda were to clarify things ("Oh, in the video I was acting. But then he did it after for real.") it wouldn't negate anything you did for either of them. 

I'm not sure if that makes sense. 


I want to again thank Cristian Scaramella. The original idea he sent me was to actually hypnotize someone amongst a group of friends, and to hypnotize him to name a card you had in your wallet. And that's how the group of friends would feel the trick is done. At a later date you could do some super quick, phony fake induction for a member of the group. And they would think they had been hypnotized to name a particular card when really you were just prepared to remove any card from your wallet via Kolossal Killer. I changed it up because I don't do hypnotism, I hate Kolossal Killer, and I wanted it to be more practical for my purposes. 

I can't emphasize how much fun this trick is to perform. Each version has its own benefits. It's a mixture of two of my favorite performing styles (what I define in The Jerx, Volume One as The Peek Backstage and The Romantic Adventure). And, like most of my favorite tricks, it's something that happens to and with the spectator, it's not just something that happens in front of the spectator.

As I wrote in a post a year ago...

And the trick will almost certainly be more powerful to her because she is central to the presentation and the effect, rather than just a witness to it. This is the locus of audience-centric magic. Bring them an experience that happens to them, in real time, and would not be the same without them there. "Magic is the only art form that doesn't exist without an audience," magicians are fond of saying. And then they perform for people the same way they would for a tree stump.