Criss Angel's Trick'd Up

Last week Criss Angel aired an unwatchable and unwatched TV special called "Trick'd Up." The 49th most popular show on cable television that evening, Trick'd Up was Criss Angel doing what Criss Angel does best:

- Looking like a budget Nikki Sixx impersonator
- Ruining Banachek's reputation

Here are some of the highlights of the show for those who missed it. Which is all of you.

The show started with Criss tearing MMA fighter Paige VanZant in two to the "dismay" of her "friends."

He doesn't restore her. He just leaves her there. I think this may have been a nod to Richiardi, but it's a confusing way to start the show because we know that he hasn't been arrested for killing Paige VanZant. So essentially the show starts with him demonstrating he's using stooges and phony reactions. And I'd be cool with that. If he came out and said something to the effect of, "These are all actors and this is theatrical magic presented in real world scenarios," that's great and all, but then you can't chop up the video 100 different ways because there's nothing resembling a magic trick left. I'm surprised I have to explain this because it's kind of a fundamental concept of magic on television. I either have to believe it's real people (in which case the editing doesn't matter because I believe in the people's response) or I have to believe this is what it would look like live (in which case it doesn't matter if I think the people are actors because I feel like I'm seeing what I would have seen if I was there myself). But if I believe in neither the people or the presentation you have the world's dullest magic special. 

He tries to liven things up with visceral magic. He makes a coin vanish and appear under his skin. He sucks a temporary tattoo of a cockroach off a woman's arm and a cockroach appears in his mouth. He tries to pass off a 4 inch by 18 inch silk as a "napkin" at a restaurant. He swallows it and then pulls it out of his neck. He does an Impaled illusion with a meat kabob sword at one of those Brazilian steakhouses. It all kind of falls flat.

There are a couple nice moments. There's a sequence where he penetrates a "spectator's" watch into a water bottle that looked nice. There's a one-shot transformation of a random dude into Steve Aoki that was decent. There was a cute thing with stuffed animals and a group of sorority girls that would have been much better if it hadn't been shot so poorly.

And for non-fans there was a nice sequence where he was punched in the stomach a lot. (But it wasn't as good as when Blaine did it with Kimbo Slice.)

Always timely, Criss has framed this special as if his crew are the dudes from Jackass (a show from 16 years ago), going around, having fun, causing trouble. But Jackass consisted of real friends genuinely enjoying each other's company. There is zero chemistry in Criss' group. And really no one is given anything to do besides Criss.

If you look at the magic shows on TV today in the US that seem to have some sort of audience (Fool Us, Carbonaro Effect, and AGT) it may be that this style of show is no longer what people are interested in. It certainly felt dated. I'll be interested to see if Blaine can revive or evolve this sort of show (the magician traveling around and showing magic to "real people" in non-theatrical environments) in his upcoming specials. 

I think the most compelling show Criss could put on right now is one where he blows up the stuff he's done before. Put on 20 pounds. Stop dying his hair. Be like, "Look, I'm a fucking 50 year old man and I'm tired. I don't want to have to suck on cockroaches to get your attention. I don't need that kind of validation anymore. It's been fun and all, but I've spent 30 years late to the party jumping on trends to try and appeal to you. I'm done with that. In this show you're going to meet the real me and see real magic unlike anything you've ever seen before." And even if this "real" Criss is completely bullshit too, at least this would give him the chance to abandon this rut he's stuck in—this beyond middle-aged man with a goth teen sensibility of darkness. Or just keep doing this nonsense and I'll look forward to the Criss Angel 2Spooky4You show coming soon.

Four Ways to Vanish a Coin, Part Four

The Romantic Adventure style gets its name from the introduction to the old radio program, Escape!

The idea behind this performing style is that you present things that are "designed to free [your audience] from the four walls of today." That sounds grandiose and if you're walking into it thinking, "I'm going to give this person a life-altering experience," then you're putting too much pressure on yourself and the moment. Instead the thought should be, "I'm going to guide this person along on a brief expedition through a unique and interesting scenario." That's all.

"Ah, no, no, no. Not my friends. They won't go for that sort of thing."

Oh, no? Your friends don't like unique and interesting things? They just come home from work every night, peruse the encyclopedia, then read thru the digits of pi starting where they left off the night before?

By definition, people are interested in interesting things. (Check your etymological dictionary, those words are actually related.) If you think your friends won't be into this type of presentation because you've seen them check-out of things you've shown them before, you have to remember that that's because they weren't engaged. The solution to that is not to dull-down your presentations to match their level of investment. You need to entice them with something more interesting.

Here are two tips when getting into this style:

1. This is not the sort of thing you'd want to perform for someone you've just met. However it is the sort of thing you can perform for a group of people you just met. "You want to try something weird?" is an intriguing lead in when you're hanging with a new group. But one-on-one, with a stranger, it sounds like a potential lead-in to forced sodomy or a murder-suicide.

2. Do not ask too much of someone, especially the first time you perform for them in this style. It's perfectly acceptable to ask for their time, interest, and to have them follow along with simple instructions. But if they don't know you, and don't know they can trust this will turn out to be something worthwhile, it's a little awkward to ask people to invest emotionally or to play a part that is not themselves. This is an intimate style of performance, and just like any type of intimacy, it's best if it grows organically. You don't invite someone in at the end of your first date and lead off with dry anal fisting.

So let's look at a coin vanish done in the Romantic Adventure style. In this approach the effects aren't used as an end in themselves. Instead they're used to establish a reality slightly askew from the one your spectator is used to.

The presentation that follows is for a complete three coin vanish. Something like Joshua Jay's Triad Coins. It's done in four acts or movements. It incorporates some elements of the previous styles mentioned—they are seeing the process of practicing magic as in the Peek Backstage, and they are seeing things get slightly beyond your control as in the Distracted Artist—but the main focus of the effect is to bring your spectator into a world where belief affects reality and re-writes memory. Want to get away from it all? We offer you... Escape!

Remember Sammy Jankis

Imagine

Your friend Hannah comes over.

You answer the door, "Oh, hey! What's up? I mean... come on in."

"Am I early?" she asks.

"Oh, no. Sorry. I knew you were coming?"

"Is that a question?"

"No. No. Of course not. My head is all over the place today. My brain is scrambled. You're here to watch a movie and get dinner. I remembered. Go take a seat and I'll get you a drink."

You come back in the room with a couple beverages. 

On the coffee table there is a post-it pad and a marker. 

"What does that mean?" she asks.

You read what it says on the Post-It.

Remember your
vanishing coins.

"Huh. I haven't the foggiest idea what that means. What are my 'vanishing coins'?"

You pick up the note and look at it, then look around the room, confused. You notice your copy of The Amateur Magician's Handbook on an end table nearby.

"Oh shit. That's right," you say as you uncap the marker. "I just spelled it wrong. It's not remember my vanishing coins" You uncap the marker and make a quick change to the note so it reads:

Remember, you're
vanishing coins.

"It's 'Remember YOU ARE vanishing coins.' I was just trying to remind myself of what I was working on."

Movement One

Before she can ask for an explanation you say, "Actually, could I get your help with something? I want you to let me know how this looks."

You grab three half dollars off the end table and hold them in a fan in your right hand. You take one with your left. Close your eyes. Squeeze it for a few seconds and open your hand. Then you open your eyes and stare directly at Hannah.

"Oh, hey! What's up?" you say.

She looks slightly confused. You act slightly confused. You look down and notice the coins in your hand then the note on the table. "Aw shit... did I just vanish a coin?" 

She's like, "Uhm... yeah," and looks at you strangely.

"Yeah... sorry,  I spaced out...uhm... can I tell you something that sounds a little strange?"

She gives you the okay.

"Alright... well... first, did you ever learn any magic as a kid?"

Movement Two

She says she knew a couple of card tricks. 

"I'm going to teach you how kids are taught to vanish a coin. Here, take one of these," you say, offering her one of the half dollars in your hand. As she goes to take it you say, "Actually, that's too big. Let's use something smaller." You set the half dollars down and grab two other coins.

Now you teach her how to do a french drop. Yes, I know, I know. This isn't some big secret. And you're teaching the french drop to make the presentation stronger and the magic stronger at the end.

Practice it a few times with her. "That's looking pretty good," you say. "But that's just the first step. The physical step. As I said, this is what they teach little kids. And, actually, the physical part of a coin vanish is never more difficult than that. Do you know what the next step is? It's a mental step. To make your vanish really convincing you have to believe you really take the coin and you have to believe the coin is really disappearing."

You demonstrate a bad french drop (where your attention is on the hand which is supposedly empty) and then you demonstrate a good french drop (where your attention is on the hand that supposedly has the coin). And you get your spectator on board with the concept that the magician's belief is a key part in making the effect stronger.

"Here's where it gets weird. As you advance in learning magic, a coin vanish becomes less and less about the physical actions and more and more about your belief. It gets to the point where it's all belief, and you're not doing any sleight-of-hand at all. But the problem is, there is an infinitesimally small line between believing hard enough to make the physical coin go, and believing so hard that your concept and memory of the coin itself goes too. And that's where I'm at. I can get the coin to vanish, but I can't control it beyond that. The existence of the coin and what I was doing with it vanishes too. And it just feels like it's eroding my memory. But this is a phase everyone goes through who tries to learn this stuff."

"I know. It's hard to believe. Let's try again."

Movement Three

You pick up the two half dollars. 

"I believe there are two coins in my right hand. I believe I'm taking one of the coins with my left hand. I believe I now have one coin in my right hand and one coin in my left."

You close your eyes.

"I believe the coin in my left hand is now dissolving away into nothingness."

You open your left hand. 

You open your eyes.

"Oh, hey! What's up?"

You look around and let it slowly dawn on you what's going on.

Movement Four

"I'm sorry. This is weird. I'm going to tell you something a little strange. Did you ever learn magic as a kid?"

She tells you yes, you already talked about this.

"Oh, we did? Good. Good. Oh...so you know everything. I want to try again and I want you to do me a favor. After I put the coin in my hand I want you to clasp my fist with your hands. When I close my eyes I want you to silently count to three and then say, 'You're vanishing a coin.' Okay?"

She agrees.

"Okay. Here goes nothing. I don't see any other half dollars so this might be the last one for a while. The truth is I don't know if it disappears because I believe it disappears or if it's here because I believe it's here. Well...either way. On with the show."

"Ladies and gentlemen," you say, very presentationally. "I am about to make this coin vanish. Nothing up my sleeves," you say, rolling up your sleeves. Then you abruptly stop.

Up and down both forearms are notes to yourself written in black marker:

Remember, you're vanishing a coin.
Amateur Magician's Handbook, page 79.
Be here. Only the coin goes.

Started with $600 in half dollars.
The Jerx - 10/14/2016
Hold onto the memories
Your name is Steven Drake. Your parents are Betty and Theodore Drake. You're 43 years old.


A dozen or so messages up and down your arms.

"Sweet Jesus... how long have I been doing this?"

You take the coin in your left hand and squeeze it. Your friend places her hands around your fist. After a few seconds she says, "You're vanishing a coin." 

"Ah... I remember," you say. "But it's still here." Your right fingers reach into your fist and remove the coin. 

"This time, maybe, wait until I open my eyes. But the moment you see them open say, 'You're vanishing a coin.'" She agrees. You take the coin back into your left fist and hold it palm down. Her hands go around your hand. You close your eyes.

After a few seconds you open your eyes. She says, "You're vanishing a coin." Your left hand opens in her hands. This is something of a weird tactile vanish of a coin. She doesn't see your empty hand but she can feel there's nothing there. Remembering the french drop lesson she will look to your right hand which is clearly empty as well. Your right hand joins your left as you softly squeeze and pat her hands.

"I vanished a coin?" you murmur. She nods.

You look gently into her eyes. "I'm sorry," you say, quietly. "Who are you?"


I can't really suggest to you how to end the interaction. The trick ends with "Who are you?" Where it goes from there depends on your spectator. They may laugh, they may sigh, they may punch you in the shoulder. If you're a good actor it may come off as a very wistful moment. You may immediately snap back to reality or you may play it out some more, slowly regaining your memories. 

Yes, this particular routine involves a bit of acting. But really nothing more than being confused and unaware of what's going on. That's something I'm sure you can handle, you box-of-rocks.

Let me be clear about the Romantic Adventure style of immersive effects. These aren't meant to be practical jokes. You're not trying to convince anybody of anything. But you should still play it straight to allow your spectators to emotionally connect to the situation. To get wrapped up in the story. You don't have to think something is real to be affected by it. (This is pretty well understood in every other art form in existence.)

But if you're doing everything with a nudge and a wink, you'll never get any reaction. It's like sexual role-play. You've got to be willing to commit to the fiction if you want to get those juices flowing, baby! 

In fact, that may be the most useful way to think about this style of presentation. It's a non-sexual role-play where neither your nor your spectator change personas. Instead you use magic effects to allow the universe to masquerade as something it's not.

How does this address the Seinfeld critique? It completely obliterates it. Seinfeld's critique was about the pointlessness of magic. That it's only purpose was to fool you. This style puts magic effects in a greater context. The coin vanishes in this routine are part of the story not an opportunity to make the spectator feel stupid.

Four Ways to Vanish a Coin, Part Three

As originally described here, the Distracted Artist style of presentation is one where the magician causes magic to happen either unintentionally or absentmindedly. If this sounds hokey to you, I understand why. It's because you've seen this style of presentation in a formal show where it's completely ridiculous. 

Magician: "I had no idea these handkerchiefs would knot themselves together!"

Audience: "Well, you brought them on stage. You're dangling them together by the corners. What exactly did you think you'd be doing on stage if not these magic tricks that you're pretending to be surprised by?"

But this style does work for the amateur, for these reasons:

1. You're not claiming magic is "just happening." You're just claiming that you hadn't intended to perform a trick now, under these circumstances. You just did it without thinking. This is logically consistent with a non-professional performance. Not so when you're standing on stage. 

2. It makes sense for such a moment to happen one time in a casual situation It doesn't make sense for such a moment to happen continually over a 45 minute show.

3. People don't really understand what it means to perform magic and practice magic as an amateur. They understand it in relation to shitty card tricks or the magic books they may have checked out of the library when they were a kid. But the things you're doing should seem far removed from those simple tricks. So maybe it is possible to absentmindedly perform a trick. You can noodle around on the guitar without really paying attention. Maybe small magic tricks can happen that way too. In the forthcoming example, the idea is that you were working on your coin vanish so much recently that now you're just automatically doing it even when you don't intend to. Is this believable? Maybe not. But it's relatable.

To understand the mindset, think about coin rolls. If you've ever done them regularly then you know that when you get good enough at them you will often pick up a coin and roll it across your knuckles without thinking. Now just extend that concept to an actual effect.

The Distracted Artist presentation lends itself very well to a two coin vanish.

Imagine

You're getting a bite to eat with a friend. You pull out a scratch-off lotto ticket.

"Do you have a coin?" you ask.

She puts a penny on the table. You pick it up and go to scratch off the card. "If I win, dinner is on me you say."

You look back at the hand that held the coin and it's gone.

"Oh crap. Do you have another coin?"

Your friend will be slightly confused. She saw you had the coin, but now it's gone. As she goes into her purse to get another coin you explain what happened. "I've been playing around with this new coin vanish and now it seems like every time I grab a coin I accidentally make it disappear. You know, it's like muscle memory. I'm not really thinking about it. It's a pain because I've lost like 4 bucks."

She sets a quarter on the table. 

"I feel like if I'm not super deliberate," you say, staring intently at the coin and slowly picking it up with your right hand.

"And suuuuuuppperrr cognizant of every move I make," you continue to give the coin 100% of your focus as you place it into your left hand. "That it's just going to disappear. You know?" For a brief moment you break concentration on the coin and look at your spectator for confirmation. Immediately you look back at your hand.

"Aw dammit, there it goes again." You open your hand to show the coin gone. 

"Do me a favor," you say, sliding the lottery ticket over to your friend. "Scratch this off. We'll split anything we win."

I'm particularly happy with the structure of this little 90-second vignette. The first vanish is a simple lapping vanish that happens on the periphery. The second is whatever complete vanish you perform. The first vanish catches them off-guard. Then the presentation completely justifies the deliberate actions of the second vanish. And the scratch-off card makes for a nice pretext for everything and a button at the end.

How does this address the Seinfeld critique? With the Distracted Artist presentation the magic is over before it starts. The spectator never has time to feel like they're being set-up. And your role of the magician is not one where you're trying to trick this person. You're just obliviously manifesting these little moments.

Tomorrow we combine these presentations and push them further into the outer limits on a Romantic Adventure.

Four Ways to Vanish a Coin, Part Two

Here's a second way to vanish a coin. 

The Peek Backstage

"Can I get your help with something I'm working on?"

In a blog full of brilliant ideas, the notion that this line is all you really need when showing people magic in casual settings is one of the best.

It's the most disarming line in magic. In an art form where the relationship between performer and spectator is often seen as an adversarial one based on a challenge, this line does something pretty extraordinary: it puts you and your spectator on the same side.

Not only that, but it's a universal line that works as well for people who are into magic as people who don't care for it. As you'll see below.

And finally, this approach clarifies what kind of transaction you're looking for with the spectator. "I'm going to show you something, and there is some particular kind of input or feedback I'd like from you." This is a very calming thing when performing for someone you don't know well. Imagine an acquaintance or a new friend said to you, "I'm going to sing you a song! Sit in that chair and listen while I sing." You'd probably think, "Uh-oh... what is this? Am I supposed to clap at the end?" But if I said, "Could you do me a favor and listen to this song I wrote and tell me if it's clear what the lyrics are about?" It would be much less weird. Now you have a job to do other than "appreciate me for my singing abilities."

When I know my spectator well, it makes sense to come up with a presentation that is more intense and somewhat tailored to that person. But for new friends or people I've just met—people for whom I don't yet know their appreciation for magic—I almost never do anything outside of this style.

With something simple, like the vanish of a coin, there is a way to tweak it a little to make the whole thing a little more bizarre and intriguing.

Let's assume you have a one coin vanish that ends very clean, with empty hands.

"Can I get your help with something I'm working on?" you ask. "Just hold still, right there for a moment."

Go through the motions of your coin vanish but don't actually do the vanish. Let's say the coin is now sitting in the palm of your hand.

"Can you still see it there?" you ask. They indicate that yes, they can, and you say, "Damn. Uhmmm. Let's try this." Now you rotate your body a small amount to the left or right (whatever direction is more advantageous for your vanish).

Now you do the vanish again, but this time you actually make it disappear. "Can you still see it now?" you ask, as if there is a coin there still to be seen. "No? Awesome. Thanks for your help, What kind of angle are we standing at would you say? 30 degrees?"

The implication is that some minute change of angle allows this coin to no longer be seen in your hand. For someone who loves magic, this is a fascinating notion. And it's exciting for them to get this peek behind the scenes. 

But the real benefit is how this presentation plays for someone who may not like magic. When people say they don't like magic, what they almost always mean is they don't like magicians. No one "doesn't like" seeing one dollar bills turn into $100s. What they don't like is the smarmy magician, his attitude, and the performer/spectator dynamic. In this presentation style you're not playing "the magician," you don't have an attitude, and the dynamic is one of equals. If anything you're asking for their help so they're the higher status ones. I've found this method can completely turn around previously skeptical or actively antagonistic spectators. People just tend not to be dicks when they've agreed to help you in some way.

How does this address the Seinfeld critique? By giving people a peek backstage and asking for their assistance, you are eliminating the dynamic of the magician being the know-it-all and the spectator being the simpleton. The spectator is now part of your team

Tomorrow, the Distracted Artist vanishes a coin.

Four Ways to Vanish a Coin, Part One

"I don't think anything competes with a magic act for humiliating entertainment value. What is the point of the magician? He comes on, he fools you, you feel stupid, show's over. You never know what's actually happened. It's never explained. And that's kind of the attitude the magician seems to have as he's performing. It's like, 'Here's a quarter. Now it's gone. You're a jerk.' Sometimes they ask you to blow on it. There's something mature adults like to do, blow on a deck of cards. I also love that little pretend look of surprise they do when the trick works. Like,'Oh, I didn't know that was going to happen myself. I even amaze me.'"

-- Jerry Seinfeld

As we come to the end of this season of the blog, I thought I would go back and look at one of the first ideas I proffered on this site: the three styles of magic presentation I find get the best reactions. Specifically I'm going to look at how you might approach each style in the performance of a coin vanish. This is something I went into more detail into in JV1,  but if you've read the Presentation Week posts from last summer, then you're pretty much up to speed.

Here is the first way to vanish a coin. The standard way.  It was described by Jerry Seinfeld in this clip from almost 40 years ago:

The audience is not laughing so hard because the joke is so clever, they're laughing because it's an observation they connect with. 

Magic, presented in the traditional way, often comes across like this. We like to imagine it doesn't. We like to think people see it as a richer experience than just being fooled. But there's a reason Seinfeld didn't go onstage and say, "What's the deal with magicians? I mean, they really remind us of the wonder that surrounds us every day, don't they? It's like, 'Here's a quarter. Now it's gone. You're experiencing the astonishment we associate the a child-like state of mind. Now it's back. You're more open to the mystery of everyday existence.'" He doesn't say that because very few people would resonate with that observation, so it wouldn't be very funny.

I'm not a big believer that you can force people to see magic in some particular light, but I do believe you can present it in ways that lessen or remove the stigma Seinfeld is talking about above. And when you remove that, you put them in a position where they're more inclined to see it as a positive experience (occasionally even a transformative one) not your weird ego trip.

So the first way to vanish a coin is the traditional, meaningless, "You're an idiot" style that Seinfeld alludes to.

As the week progresses we'll look at other approaches.  

Part Two tomorrow.

 

Gardyloo #15

If you're a Jerx completist, there is an effect of mine in the latest Penguin Magic Monthly.

It's not a new trick. You can see it here. 

Just to emphasize what a savvy marketer of my material I am, I received an offer a couple weeks ago from a magician you all know asking if he could buy the rights for that trick and have me take it off my website. It would have been a nice little payday, the best this site has provided to this point. Instead, I had already given that trick to Penguin to put in their magazine for which I received... I don't think I received anything! I have to spend $50 if I even want to get a free copy of the magazine! And there's nothing I really want to get until the Milk to Light Bulb is back in stock.

It's a good thing I'm part-sociopath or this sort of thing would probably get to me. Instead I'm just delighted that one of the strongest, most direct effects in the history of magic is now hidden away to be forgotten about in Penguin's free monthly magic thingy. 


Speaking of marketing. If you're a pro who does close-up gigs, you'll probably want to check out Andi Gladwin's second At the Table lecture. While it has a few tricks in it, the main selling point is the tips on marketing and crafting your website. It's like 8 bucks, so you don't have much to lose and the advice is really sound.

And it's always funny to watch Andi and Josh attempt to suppress the true nature of their relationship in public.


Here's a throwback.

I used to use the effect "Milk to Light Bulb" as a punchline on my old site. It's such a stupid idea for a trick that more than one person thought I had made it up as a gag. No, it's a real trick.

(When I started this site I didn't mention Milk to Light Bulb much because I realized there was an equally arbitrary trick that people had convinced themselves was good: bill to lemon. It's not good. It's meaningless impossibility. Like so much of magic. )

At any rate, I found a couple old pictures in a defunct email address with the label "funtime" on them. They're pictures of a friend of mine dressed up as Steve Brooks' old profile picture on the Magic Cafe. They were taken for a post on a fake product I had created called "Light To Milk Carton." Sadly the other pictures and the post they go along with are lost to time. And those pictures included my friend in his Brooks get-up pouring milk all over himself, and the money shot of the light pouring out of the carton. He has his suspenders tucked into his underwear because he didn't want to get back on the subway with milk drenched jeans. Understandable.


In fact, here is the first mention of Milk to Light Bulb from the old site:

Thursday, November 20, 2003

World's Dumbest Magic Trick? 

Why does this trick exist?

I don't get it. It seems so arbitrary. Milk to light bulb? Why not have an effect where a steel-toed work boot fills up with ravioli? Where's that effect? Why don't they sell an effect where a barbecue grill magically overflows with hooded sweatshirts?

It would be one thing if you could make a light bulb in your friend's house fill up with milk. It still wouldn't make any sense, but it would be very puzzling. But when you bring a lamp somewhere, turn it on, and then show that the light bulb is filled with milk, I think the natural reaction would be, "Hmmm, I guess he's a got a lamp that looks like it's lit even when the light bulb is filled with milk."

In fact your only defense would be to say, "Hey, if I was going to spend $275 on a magic trick, do you really think I'd buy one that caused milk to appear in a light bulb? That doesn't even make any fucking sense! So it must be real magic!" Although that logic is a little suspect as well.

What amazes me is that they claim to be better than all the other models on the market. There are other models!

Take a look at the pictures on that website. The guy pours the milk from a pitcher into a cone of newspaper, the milk vanishes, appears in a light bulb, which he pours back into the pitcher. Hey asshole! You should have saved us the time and energy and just left the milk in the pitcher to begin with!

If there is a more nonsensical trick out there, please let me know.

The Only Life Skill That Matters

[Weekends are for non-magic posts.]

It's amazing how much time people let tick-tick-tick away.

I travel a lot and so I spend a lot of time sitting next to strangers. There is some element of my personality or demeanor that makes people feel comfortable opening up to me. And I feel I have had conversations like this 100 times in my life.

Stranger: Yeah, well I just got out of a 16-year marriage.
Me: How long should the marriage have lasted? I mean, at what point did you know it wasn't going to work?
Stranger: Oh, after 8 months I knew we weren't right for each other.

Everyone is spending too much time in dead-end relationships, at dead-end jobs, and on dead-end paths. 

They're not confused or unsure. They might be scared or lazy. But either way, they're definitely paralyzed by the thought of action. Which is bizarre because action is the remedy for everything (depression, anxiety, boredom, fear, regret). Action is even the remedy for previously ill-thought out actions. It's like a drug that cures the complications from itself.

If there is something you want to do that you're not doing, I am going to propose to you a first step:

Take an improv class.

If you're anywhere near even a medium-sized city, you should be able to find an improv class. Go sign up for one.

"But I don't want to be a comedian."

That's not why you're taking the class. The improv community will offer you a whole host of benefits they say improv can bring. They'll tell you it will make you more confident. That it will make you a better speaker. That it will make you a better performer. That it will allow you to live in the moment. That it will increase your communication skills. Those are all pretty much true.

Then they'll give you some fruity nonsense benefits about how improv is an opportunity to "play" and use your imagination and be a kid again. That may or may not be true.

But all those real or imagined benefits pale in comparison to the one life skill improv teaches you, and it's the only one that matters: The ability to minimize the time between inspiration and action.

In improv you are encouraged to act on every momentary impulse. In real life you don’t need or want to act on every whim. But your life will be improved when you act on those things that are a "calling" to you. And once you become a person of action you will quickly learn to differentiate between the two (the whims and the callings). Improv will give you practice at becoming a person of action.

When you first start with improv, you'll have an idea and you'll sit back wondering if you should offer it up and the moment will pass you by again and again. You'll gradually begin to shorten that time between the moment you have the idea and the moment you act upon it. You'll be rewarded for action because it moves things forward. Improper action will be corrected through more action. Improv, at the highest level, is a bunch of people taking action simultaneously with the inspiration. Your life, at the highest level, should probably be something similar.

Or, you know, you can mull over every moment of decision, put off action, and weigh the pros and cons over and over until you're dead.

by Scott Dikkers

by Scott Dikkers