The Juxe: Make-Out Mix Part I

“I need a copy of this playlist,” is what I hear 9 out of 10 times I spend an evening with someone in a romantic scenario for the first time. Yes, it’s nice to be complimented on my taste in music, but I’d sort of rather them turn to me and talk like the old lady in Titantic

I’ve put a lot thought into my “make-out mix.” Sometimes it’s so successful that women do even more than make-out with me. Not to brag or anything. But have I felt a boob? Hellz yeah. A couple, in fact.

In this new series I will help you build your make-out mix with some categories I look to for inspiration and some specific examples. Then you can build up your mix and, with any luck, think of this website when you’re getting down.

I lean towards slower tempo songs. Even if things are getting pretty frantic and hot & heavy with someone, you can still make that work with a slow tempo. But the opposite doesn’t work. A slow, seductive moment doesn’t work well if you’re playing, like, Turkey in the Straw in the background

I tend towards female singers. But not always.

The only rule I have in place when making a make-out/sex mix is don’t use songs that are overtly about sex. I mean, a lot of music is about sex. Maybe most music is. But you don’t want to use songs like, “Sexual Healing,” or “Let’s Get It On.” That’s like if you were a baseball player and your walk-up music was, “Take Me Out to the Ballgame.” You want music that suggests a mood, first and foremost. Not music that’s a literal description of what you’re doing.

Today’s Category:

Slowed Down Covers

This category is good for the make-out mix because it takes songs that people are familiar with and puts them in a style that is more conducive with hooking up. So there’s a familiarity with the music, but the songs aren’t completely fucked out.

Taken by Trees covers Sweet Child O’ Mine by Guns and Roses

Cowboy Junkies cover Sweet Jane by The Velvet Underground

Today Kid covers We Belong by Pat Benatar

Lykke Li covers Unchained Melody by The Righteous Brothers

Madge covers In Too Deep by Sum 41

Harvest Time Part Four

8b6fddc410016849bea47c61769eb4b8.jpg

Each year at the Harvest Moon I take some time to assess the state of the site and what is going to happen with it in the next year.

The main thing I learned this year is that I’m not capable of filling this site with just short posts.

In the past few years I have continually said I’m going to focus less on creating content for the site. Last year’s Harvest post said that in 2020 the site’s content would be reserved for “shorter and stupider” posts. But the posts have pretty much remained the same length and are no more or less stupid than they always were. For whatever reason I’m having a hard time transitioning the site to just goofball shit, despite my stated intentions.

And—as I mentioned in a previous post—I’m still not sure why I thought going from 12 posts a month to 20 and from 4 newsletters a year to 10 was going to cut down on my workload. Like, I literally haven’t a fucking clue where I was even coming from with that idea. I guess I was thinking it was going to be 20 really short posts a month? I think that was the plan.

The only reason this scheduling ended up working this year was because the time I would normally spend performing was cut off drastically due to coronavirus. Probably by at least 80%. Fortunately this didn’t impact anything I had planned too much because this year’s book for supporters doesn’t really include new tricks. Instead it’s a collection of presentational techniques—ones that I’ve worked on for years. So I didn’t have to workshop much of anything new.

We also haven’t done any new testing this year since the coronavirus situation, so that has freed up many hours that hopefully won’t be free next year.

But the lack of performing and testing has led to a backlog of tricks that I’ve created in the past 6 months that I haven’t been able to put in front of people yet. So when things do get more back to normal I will have to devote a larger chunk of time to performing in order to catch back up.

I know most of you are like, “That’s fine, Andy. You do what you need to do when you need to do it.” I receive almost no pressure from the supporters of this site, thankfully. The reason I write these posts is more to help myself better understand where things are, than to try and justify it to anyone else.

So if the supporters fund another year of the site in 2021, the only change will probably be in the posting schedule and the newsletter schedule. Exactly what that change will be, I don’t know yet, but I will be pulling back a little on both to free up more performing and experimenting time that wasn’t needed this year.

To answer the question I get most often:

“Will you be adding more supporter slots?”

No. A small number of slots are added every year organically because the book printer always prints a certain number of books over the number I request, just to make sure they have enough copies to deliver should anything go wrong. And any extra books are offered on a first-come/first-serve basis to people who have emailed me and asked to be on the waiting list. Buying one of those “overage” copies, also opens up a supporter slot for them. But other than those few that come about naturally each year, I will not be adding more slots.

As for the 2020 rewards package, everything is coming along nicely. The next book should be finished in about 6 weeks and then ready to ship to supporters in early 2021. And I just got the first rough sketches for what the next Jerx deck #4 will look. It’s going to be really stupid!

While We Were Out

MW wrote in to bring my attention to a video that Alakazam recently sent out for the trick, Influencer by Astor.

The video promises that the trick delivers a “fanny beginning.”

Screen Shot 2020-09-30 at 11.12.36 PM.png

I know this is confusing to some people, but it’s actually just a simple misunderstanding of British vs. American English. In America this trick would be said to have a “fanny ending.”

I hope that clears things up.

That email from Alakazam also had a review for a trick called Executive Suite. I’m fairly certain this review was written by the mother of the guy who designed the packaging.

Screen Shot 2020-09-30 at 11.19.09 PM.png

Yes… but what about the most important thing with any magic trick… the packaging?

If you had told 13-year-old me, buying tricks from the magic store that came in mailing envelopes and (if it was a fancy trick) ziplock sandwich bags, that someday people would care about trick packaging, I would have been very confused. “Huh? The part you throw out?”


September 21st passed while we were away. If you don’t know the story of Demi Adejuyigbe and what he’s been doing on the 21st of September for the past few years, I encourage you to check it out here. It’s the sort of thing I love. I remember back when I was writing the old site in 2004-ish people used to think it was an insult to write me and say, “You have too much time on your hands.” That’s always been the corniest criticism as far as I’m concerned. The type of art I’m most drawn to is the stuff that people say that about. So I never took it negatively. What interesting piece of art/entertainment have you ever seen and thought, “Wow, this guy must have been really busy with other stuff when he did this!”

Having time on your hands allows you to do some fun shit. And Demi’s 9/21 bit is excellent.

Although nothing will beat this tweet of his, as far as I’m concerned. (Sound on)


I found a trick while sorting through some stuff over the past week, and I don’t know what it was. I’m hoping maybe one of you can help identify it. It was just some props in a small clear plastic bag, so there was no branding on it. I should have taken a picture, but I didn’t think to at the time, and now I’m not in the location where the trick is. So instead I will paint a picture in your mind. Imagine me, and my taught, nubile body sorting through a box with some old tricks in it—wait, sorry, I’m focusing on the wrong details. Okay, so the props… the props consisted of a couple blank cards and some card-sized transparencies with cards faces printed on them. There were two transparencies. I think it was a 2 and a 3, but it might not have been. If you held the transparencies over the blank card it looked like a normal card. I can sort of see what you might do with this, but I’m curious to know exactly what the trick was. If you have any ideas, let me know.


Joshua Jay made a very sad (but in its own way, very brave) Instagram post while we were away.

Of course what makes this so heartbreaking is that Josh and Andi are now doing this in separate beds. If those two can’t make it, what hope do any of us have? I realize they have to live their truth, and I don’t expect them to stay together “for the kids” (that is, us magicians). But still, it’s so sad.

What’s most devastating about this is that it’s very clear from the picture whose idea the split was, and who is handling it well, and whose heart is shattered. And while I’m proud of Josh for feeling strong enough to be honest about the dissolution of their relationship, I’m not sure this was the best photo with which to do so, as it sort of cruelly juxtaposes how painful (or not) the situation has been for both of them.

IMG_6753.jpg
IMG_6754.jpg
IMG_6754.jpg

Until October...

It’s Saturday afternoon and I’m watching Luke Jermay, Michael Weber and Max Maven having a discussion about Zoom magic as part of Vanishing Inc’s Masterclass series.

It’s kind of interesting, but as a social performer, it’s nice to no longer have to worry about this stuff. Not that we’re completely past coronavirus concerns, of course. But for the most part, I can find people in real life to show something to when I want to. I’m nowhere near the pace of performing I was at before all of this, but that’s okay. I was a real magic slut then. I’m just being a little less promiscuous for the time being.

Everyone is still pretty well masked up where I am, in the northeast U.S. I would say it seems like 99% of the people have a mask on in public. I tried a mentalism type thing with one of the barista’s at a coffee shop I frequent. I let it fail a couple of times and then I said. “Okay, I’m going to step back a little bit. When I do, would you mind taking off your mask for me? It will just be for a few seconds. But it’s kind of getting in the way of what I’m hoping to pick-up from you.” Without hesitation she was okay with the idea and she took off her mask and it was like the goddamn Dance of the Seven Veils with how exposed she seemed. It was a weirdly intimate moment.

“You’re the first person who has seen my face in here in six months,” she said. “I never thought I’d feel shy about someone seeing my mouth.”

It was fun. As much as the coronavirus situation has been terrible, I’ve been enjoying riding the wave of the shifting dynamics of social interactions as we’ve progressed through it.

I will be curious to see how this plays out for professional magicians. I’ve heard from some who were actually excited by how well things were going for them when everything was locked down hard, but now that things have opened up more, they’re in a kind of limbo state where people aren’t going out to see a show, but they don’t want to be locked in their home seeing a show either when there are some places they could be going.

We’ll see how it goes. My instincts tell me that Zoom magic is not the way of the future for professional performers. That the sort of people who want to see a magic show are the sort of people who want to get out of their house to do so. But who the hell knows.

Someone wrote me saying that Zoom shows were good because you “get to see people’s reactions” more so than you do in a theater. But… do you? Certainly you don’t watch the show with 40 other boxes on the screen, right? You just watch with the magician’s box up (for the most part), unless the magician is doing something for one particular audience member. And while I guess it’s good that you get a good close-up of that person’s reaction, I think it could backfire just as well, making them self-conscious about how they’re reacting with a camera in their face. Plus, you lose a lot of the charm if you’re David Copperfield and you’re floating a paper rose for someone in their living room 500 miles away, as opposed to the amateur model in the mini-skirt that you plucked from the audience.

But those are issues for you professional magicians to concern yourself with. I’m done with that Zoom shit.


I was planning to email you to let you know that “Dai Vernon” [from last Wed/Thur posts] was wrong. I purchased Ellusionist’s new ringflite effect and performed it a few times last week and got extraordinary reactions.

This weekend I learned that both of the people who had reacted strongest to the effect had googled something like “ring keychain magic trick” and had discovered the trick online. So Dai was right. It sucks. I want to go back with Dai and perform in the 1970s. —CP

Yeah, it sucks. It’s the catch-22 of modern performing. A trick that hits them really hard is going to be a trick that they’ll take steps to understand more in some way.

Sometimes, by manipulating the emotional element of the trick, you can misdirect them away from the instinct to google a trick. But unfortunately putting someone’s ring on a keychain is not a super emotionally resonant effect.


Is the load on that new ring-flite easy enough that you could load a key onto it?

I’m imagining having someone take out their keychain and remove one of their keys (emphasizing the mildly arduous nature of this task). Have them hold their keychain in the palm of their hand. False transfer the key from your right to left hand. Now “massage” the (non-existent) key with your left-hand against the keychain in their hands. You say you’re going to make the key penetrate onto the keychain. You lift your left hand, and the key is gone. They look through their keychain, but it’s not there. You then go on to reveal that you never said which keychain the key would penetrate onto and you pull out your keychain to show the key is hooked on there.

I don’t know if that’s any good of an idea, or even if it’s doable. But I do think I could come up with a better presentation for their key appearing on my keychain, rather than their ring. I may pursue it if it’s possible.


Christopher H. wrote in to suggest something that might have some magical presentation uses. I haven’t quite decided how I feel about it just yet. I think there’s a possibility that it would lead to ideas that are a bit too convoluted, but there might be some way to keep it from veering into that territory as well. I’ll just share the idea with you here and maybe you can play around with it.

There’s a website/app called what3words, and it has broken up the world into three-meter squares and each square has a three word code associated with it. So whether you’re at someone’s front door, in the middle of the ocean, or lost in the woods, you can identify precisely where you are with that three word phrase. And if you can communicate that phrase to someone else, they can find you (the three word phrase for a given square of the earth never changes).

The problem is that you’d have to explain this concept to people to get them to understand what the hell you’re talking about.

But you can see how—if this concept was clear to people—you could force words to lead to a specific location. Or force a location (dry marker on map) to lead to certain words.

Almost any three word phrase has been assigned to some location in the word. jerky.magic.blog is in Gayndah, Queensland, Australia.

I think there’s potential here for magic uses. But even if not, I’ve found people to be pretty entertained just by looking up what three words are assigned to exactly where you are at that moment.


I really like these Secret Lovers playing card images by Mahdieh Farhadkiaei that combine two values into one card. They don’t exist as an actual deck, but it would be cool if they did. Ideally the cards would exist singly as well. So you could force the Jack of Spades and the Queen of Hearts on a couple and then do an Anniversary Waltz type of merging of the cards into one.


Good god, it’s been hours and these nerds are still talking about Zoom magic. They’re barely listening to each other. Just rambling on and on about nothing. Let me transcribe some of it for you…

Michael Weber: I like doing magic over Zoom because it means that bullies can’t punch me and steal my gimmicked decks.

Luke Jermay: What’s your favorite trick to do on Zoom? My favorite is to turn my laptop towards my television which is playing the performance section from one of Sankey’s old L&L tapes while I go into the next room and try to drink the night away. Why bother anymore?

Max Maven: Sweet Christ, what has my life become? I’m 85 goddamn years old. I was a titan in the world of magic. And now I have to perform for idiots in their pajamas over Skype to make a nickel? I haven’t had a paid gig in months. My best offer was from Ellusionist who wanted me to create a series of downloads aimed at their target demographic called Max Maven’s Tricks with Bubble Gum: Animal Crossing Edition.

Weber: I think we should all say our favorite lines to use against hecklers and bullies. I thought people would be nicer over Zoom because they can’t make fun of my sneakers. But now they’re just making fun of me for how messy my living room is. Do you guys know any good lines to get them to stop being mean?

Jermay: This is—by far—the darkest period of my professional life… and I put out a book with Kenton Knepper!

Maven: Picture it. 1979. Me. Eugene. McBride. Walking—three-across—down Hollywood Boulevard. Bitches be like:

giphy.gif

Cut to: Me and the boys in a hotel room. Ice bucket filled with cocaine. Passing around the ladies like party-favors. Wake up, it’s Monday. Go to sleep. Wake up again, it’s Saturday. Go to the Castle. Do 5 minutes of performing and reload on the women and the blow. Party all day. Party all night. Fighting. Fucking. Dancing my little booty off, buck-ass naked with a rainbow coalition of skanks. Go to bed, it’s the 4th of July. Wake up, it’s Christmas. What a time to be alive.

Now what has my life become? Today I was trying to find the right shade of black construction paper to put on the back of my playing cards so they’ll blend into my close-up pad because I had a client tell me they’d only hire me if I can do “what Shin Lim does.”

Earlier this week I got all happy because I realized I could just use a Zoom filter to put on my widow’s peek, rather than draw it in every night. Maybe save myself $28 in mascara cost this year. Whoop-dee-damn-doo.

Weber: I just don’t know why bullies have to be mean to you when all you want to do is show them a trick and have fun and be friends!

***

Holy moley. It’s been four hours of this. Yikes. This is a sad time for magic.


Okay everyone. I’ll see you back here October 1st. Take care of yourself until then.

How I Made $1000/Week Working 5 Minutes A Day: Part Two

You can read the first part of the story in last Sunday’s post.

So, I was living in NYC and needed to find a way to make some money fast so I could move out of the 24 square foot “hotel room” I was living in.

I was just out of college, with a fairly worthless degree, so the answer wasn’t: go find a good paying job. The jobs available for people my age with my background were all entry-level jobs that didn’t pay much. That type of job might provide me enough to scrape by in the city once I was settled in an apartment somewhere. But it would take way too long to accumulate the lump sum I needed to get into an apartment in the first place.

In a moment, I’ll tell you what I did. But first, think how you would attack the problem. Let’s say asking someone else for money wasn’t on the table and you wanted to make a few thousand dollars quickly without doing anything illegal or risky and you had no marketable skills.

The method I came up with required no skills and was essentially guaranteed money. There was really no risk. It’s not the sort of thing where I scraped together $500 and then placed it all on red at the casino and hoped to win and double it three times in a row. The system I came up with wasn’t risky. And it didn’t take advantage of anybody.

Sorry. I’m dragging this out a little. And the reason I’m doing that is because you’re all people who read a magic blog and thus probably have an interest in magic and puzzles and those sorts of things. So I’m setting this up like a puzzle for you. I’m telling you the conditions to see if you can think of a way to accomplish what I was trying to accomplish.

Okay, here’s what I did.

The first thing that came to mind was street performing. I thought of Penn and Teller and the stories I read about how when Penn was a street performer he was making a fortune passing the hat after juggling.

But Penn was a master juggler and has a street performer’s mentality. I was not and did not.

But thinking about Penn was the first thing that steered me towards coming up with a way to make money from a large group of people, rather than trying to find a job or employer to pony up a large amount of money when I didn’t have much to offer in return.

I never considered doing magic on the street, that wasn’t even an option for me. That time was a lull in my interest in magic. And even if it hadn’t been, performing for large groups of people was never really something I had any interest in. And performing for just a couple random people at a time seemed even worse. I had seen some sad schmucks come up to people on the subway and force a magic trick on them in hopes of getting a buck or two in return. That seemed beyond depressing to me.

I didn’t want to guilt people into giving me money. I wanted them to be happy to give me money. But people are only happy to give money to really talented performers.

Could I come up with a situation where people would be excited about giving an average performer money?

I could, and I did.

Here’s how it worked.

First, I bought a ukulele. This was before the ukulele renaissance and before hipsters picked them up. This was back when they were still something of a novelty instrument. I have an uncle who played ukulele, and I had played around with one enough to know I could pick up enough chords to strum a few songs with just a couple of hours of learning.

But a neophyte ukulele player was not going to make a lot of money. People will tip good musicians playing on the street or in the subway, but for me to be out there with my average singing and below average playing, that wasn’t going to work.

So I thought, what would make me want to tip a ukulele player even if they weren’t that good?

Well, if they were playing a song I really liked, then I’d probably tip them, even if it wasn’t a masterpiece of a performance.

So I spent a lot of time thinking of what would be a song that a lot of people would like. What’s the most widely appealing song? But I couldn’t come up with anything.

So my next idea was that I would learn 100 or so songs that used simple chords and I would be like a human jukebox and I’d have some sort of placard where people could select a song and I’d play it for them. And that way I would pretty much guarantee that at the very least the people who chose the song would tip me.

But that might just be one couple on a subway car. They might be happy to pay, but it wasn’t going to translate into that many more tips from everybody else. Plus I didn’t like the idea of approaching people and coercing them into picking a song and all that. I needed to find a situation that would be the equivalent of walking onto a subway car and playing a song that everyone in the car wanted to hear.

And that’s when my plan came together.

So if you were on the streets in January of my first year in NY, this is what you might have seen: Me, walking down the street strumming my ukulele and gently singing a song.

🎵I may not always love you
But long as there are stars above you
You never need to doubt it
I'll make you so sure about it
God only knows what I'd be without you🎵

I’d sing and walk until I came upon a group of people congregating on the sidewalk. I’d finish up the song for them and get some polite applause and maybe a couple bucks.

I’d notice they were at the end of a line. “What’s this line for?” I’d ask. “A new sneaker being released tonight or something?”

“No,” they’d say, “we’re waiting to buy tickets for a concert.”

“Oh yeah? What concert?” I’d ask.

“Savage Garden,” they’d say. Or some other group of the era.

“Oh, cool. Stay warm… Oh wait… I know a Savage Garden song… I think. Wait.. how does it go….” I’d pluck a few random strings and then stumble my way into “I Knew I Loved You Before I Met You.” And they would freak out. Here was this guy, walking down the street in winter, playing this instrument that most people hadn’t seen in person at that point. And he just happened to know one of their favorite songs!

But it wasn’t just a favorite song of that group of people. That group was standing at the back of a line of 100, 200, maybe 500 people who all loved this song.

I would traverse the line singing the song and the crowd would go bananas for it. You have to keep in mind, it was a different world then. This was 20ish years ago. We were still some time away from being able to see a performance of any song you like any time you want on your phone. So finding a street musician playing a song you know and love—a modern song, not some old standard—was much more impactful at that point than it might be now.

More often than not, the line of people would join in and sing along. There was a truly festive, joyful feeling in the cold winter air. I’d finish the song to raucous applause and bright smiles. And then it was pass the hat time. And I’d strum the song gently and walk down the line again and collect my tips and my appreciation for bringing that moment to them. After five minutes work, I’d walk away with a few hundred dollars, easily. At the very least I’d average $1 per person in line, but often more than that.

Of course you realize this was no accident. I didn’t just stumble across this location and happen to know a song. This was my benevolent scam to get me out of the flop house I was living in.

Because I was seeing so much live music myself, I had learned the venues where lines would develop of people either waiting to get into shows or to purchase tickets. I’d scour Time Out New York to see what concerts were coming up and when they were happening or when the tickets were going on sale. Once I had identified a good option, I’d go to an internet cafe and search for the chords to one of the band’s songs and transcribe them into a spiral notebook. Then I’d spend a little time committing the song to memory.

The big change in my thinking that allowed this to come together was when I went from trying to find a song that a random group of people would like, and instead trying to find a specific group of people who I could be certain would all love a given song.

People waiting in line for tickets or early entry to a show are rabid fans. You don’t have to be an expert singer or instrument player to satisfy them. They’re just happy that you, apparently, like the same thing they do. And they’re going to tip you because you’re “kindred spirits” or because tipping you is a demonstration of their fandom for the music you’re playing.

In a matter of weeks I had made 1000s of dollars running this ploy about 15 times. It was enough money to get myself into an apartment and hold me over for a few weeks while I had time to search for a proper day-job that was a good fit for me and had the potential for growth (as opposed to just jumping on the first opportunity that presented itself).

When I first came up with the ukulele scam I thought, “Hell, I’ll just keep doing this forever!” Unfortunately, two things happened that shut it down much faster than I had expected. First, I got at least one copycat who started doing the same thing, and I realized there would just be more and more of that if people saw me making $200 in a few minutes. And the second thing that happened was one night a person in line recognized me from another time they had been in line a few weeks before. And I could tell they were sort of bummed that what they thought was a spontaneous moment of serendipity was likely something I had planned all along. I realized that too was bound to happen more and more if I continued to pull this ruse. And I felt bad spoiling the memory of this jubilant, communal experience that I had created for them.

So, sadly, other than some rare exceptions when I was in a real bind for money, that was the end of my street performing career.


Second Helpings #2

The Second Helpings feature is one of the forms of free advertising here on the Jerx where authors and magic creators can get word of their work out, simply by offering what they consider the second best thing from their release for me to post here.

This month we have an older release from Bill Cushman called Subliminal Squares. This is a manuscript about the Magic Square effect, but rather than being a demonstration of the magician’s needlessly complex addition abilities (and thus, in turn, his late-onset sexual development), Subliminal Squares presents the magic square as an example of the spectator’s ability to pick up on subliminal messaging. The spectator is flashed the completed magic square then they name a number, and it’s seen that the magic square adds up to that number (in all the various magic square orientations).

This is probably the only way I can ever see myself doing the magic square. The traditional way, where they name a number, and you quickly write up the square, is not a demonstration of any particular skill I’d ever want to express.

The ebook ends with a trick called Crosseyed! I’m not writing it like that because I’m excited about it. Crosseyed! with the exclamation point is the name of the trick. This is sort of a kid-brother version of the magic square. I like it. It doesn’t require any memory work and it’s completely impromptu. It’s still an exhibition of semi-extraordinary math skill, but it’s simpler than the traditional magic square in a way I find appealing.

Here’s how i would present it. I’d draw eight line on a piece of paper like this.

I’d tell the person I’m performing for that I’m going to go and stand in the corner with my back to them. While I can’t see, I want them to write four 2-digit numbers. One in each slot in the vertical column.

IMG_6743.JPG

As they do this I’d bounce back and forth on my feet. Like I’m prepping myself for something difficult. When they tell me they’re done, I’d ask them to turn over the paper so I can’t see anything.

I’d go to turn around and stop myself. “Sorry. I’m not ready yet.” I’d do a little more deep breathing and then jump back to the table. Quickly sit. Turn over the paper. And immediately write four numbers down in the horizontal row. (I’ve used different colors here just to clarify.)

IMG_6744.JPG

Then I’d turn the paper back over and slap it down on the table. During this I would probably let out a low groan the whole time. As if I was trying to lift up something heavy.

I’d catch my breath. “Okay… that either worked or this will be profoundly embarrassing. Do you remember the numbers you wrote down?” They may or may not. It doesn’t really matter. “Okay, and off the top of your head do you know the sum of those numbers?” They probably don’t. “Me neither. But I’ve been learning these exercise related to something called IMU—Innate Mathematical Understanding. The concept… and I’m not sure how much I believe it… is that we’re born with a complete understanding of math. And it’s actually the process of breaking down math into steps and processes to learn it that disrupts our innate understanding of it. It sounds kind of crazy, but think of it like this: When you’re shooting a basketball, you’re calculating trajectories. Your’e calculating arcs and parabolas and vectors and power. And you’re doing it all in a split second subconsciously. If you were to put it down on paper and try to run those calculations that’s the type of thinking that would end up screwing up your shot. So perhaps there is a built in instinctive understanding of math that we can tap into.

“Alright, I probably should have checked to see if this worked before explaining all that. But let’s take a look.”

I’d turn over the page. “Let’s add up the numbers you put down. Check my work.”

I would then verbalize the adding of the numbers in the vertical column. Dragging it out as long as I can without sounding idiotic. “67 plus 44. Okay, so 60 plus 40 is 100. Plus 7 and 4 so that’s 111. Yes?” I’d continue on through until getting a full total of 181.

“Okay, so when I first turned the paper over, my goal was to just absorb the numbers you wrote down, somewhat subconsciously, and view them as a whole. I didn’t really consciously understand that they added up to 181 at that point. But I didn’t see them as individual numbers either. I just tried to sense them holistically. So my target number was 181 even though I didn’t realize that yet.

“Now, it’s hard to explain this, because there are a lot of visualization exercises you need to do to get to this point. But I allowed the total of your numbers—which I genuinely did not know—to crumble into four different figures in my mind. And I just wrote down whatever came to me. So if it worked, these numbers I wrote down should add up to the random total you established.”

We’d add up my numbers to see if they totaled 181. And of course they would.

“Okay, now here’s where it goes beyond my rudimentary understanding. So 181 was the target number that you established without even knowing it.”

I’d put 181 in the center of the cross and then draw two circles, creating an actual target-looking thing on the paper.

IMG_6745.JPG

“So, if you asked me to take four random numbers that you wrote, add them up, and then come up with four other numbers that came to the same total, I could do that using the math I learned in school. It would have taken me a lot longer than doing it instinctually, like I just did. But I could have done it.

“But I wouldn’t even begin to know how to do is this next part. And what I’m talking about is that not only do your numbers add up to 181 , and my numbers add up to 181. But our numbers when put together also add up to 181. Check out this outer ring of numbers… that’s 181. And this inner ring of numbers is also 181. That’s where I become completely lost on not only how I did it, but how I would even go about doing it consciously.”

There you have it. I will give it a go and see how it plays. Is it still a show-offy thing? Sort of. But since I’m playing it off as something I don’t fully understand (just in the same way you don’t fully understand all the calculations you make when shooting a basketball) I don’t think it will come off that way. I think it will be seen as something a little weirder. But we’ll see.

The explanation of Crosseyed! from Bill’s book is in the link below. You can buy the full ebook from Bill by writing to him at wcushman@bellsouth.net or sending him a paypal payment directly to that address. It’s $40 for Jerx readers (down 20% from where you can buy it elsewhere).

A few notes:

  1. It’s not a trick I would use on someone who is super strong with math.

  2. You’ll understand this more when you read the explanation. But you don’t have to use 3, as Bill does. You can use whatever you want. In the write-up above, I used 14. Doing it with a larger number wouldn’t be hard for me, and it would make my numbers potentially seem even more different than the first participants. It may kick me into 1-digit or 3-digit numbers. But that’s okay. I never said I was going to stick to two-digit numbers.

  3. The example Bill uses in the book isn’t great, because the way it works out is that 2 of the 4 numbers are repeated in the horizontal and vertical slots. That obviously makes it look much less deceptive. But that’s just the way it happened to work out with the numbers he chose. Don’t get confused by that. In practice you should usually have 8 different numbers.

Okay, have fun. Here’s the pdf.

If you’re interested in a full magic square routine, consider reaching out to Bill for his ebook.

My Conversation with Dai Vernon: Part 2

In yesterday’s post, I told you how Dai Vernon contacted me via a Ouija board and told me his old saying that “the best effects can be described in one sentence,” is no longer applicable. How—in the 21st century—having an effect that can be described in one sentence is the exact same as having an effect that is easily google-able. And that we have to suspect that anyone who is truly fooled and captured by an effect is likely to google it later.

This was what sent me spiraling. And I asked Dai what the purpose of performing was if people just want to google and figure out the secret? Why bother creating a magical experience for them if their natural inclination was to undermine it?

“Oh, you’re misunderstanding things,” he said. “Think of it like this. Imagine you gave your wife a card for your 20th anniversary. And inside the card you wrote her a little note. Just a couple of sentences. And they were the most romantic, heartwarming words she’d ever read. They were so beautiful that she almost couldn’t believe you wrote them because you usually don’t express yourself like that. Later that evening she thinks, ‘Okay… I just have to know. Is this his own original sentiment or did he get it from somewhere else? Did I really inspire these words?’ So she googles what you wrote to see if it pops up somewhere online. What is it she’s hoping to find?

“Or,” he continued, “let’s make an even simpler comparison and keep it in the magic realm. A woman is lying on a table on stage and the magician makes her vanish. The audience thinks, ‘Hmm.,.. she’s probably under the table, hidden by the tablecloth.’ Right as they’re thinking that, the magician walks around the table, and grabs a corner of the tablecloth. And just at the moment that the Peter Gabriel song reaches its crescendo, he whips the tablecloth away. What do you think the audience wants to see? Do they want to know how it’s done and see the woman crouching beneath the table? Or do they want to see nothing but four bare table legs and the glimmering scrim in the background?”

“So you’re saying….,” I trailed off. Not exactly putting it all together yet.

“You’re asking why you should bother doing magic if you have to concern yourself with the audience googling an effect after it’s done. But the stage magician doesn’t ask himself why he should bother doing the trick if he has to concern himself with the audience wondering what’s under the table. He just creates the trick in such a way that the audience can look under the table. And he does this because he knows the audience will suspect the woman is there but actually they don’t want to find the woman under the table.

“The wife googles the husband’s love note hoping to get no results. Only by doing that can she be certain that what she has is special and unique.

“And it’s my belief that when a spectator googles a trick after you’re done—they may not know it—but this is what they’d really like to find…”

Screen Shot 2020-09-15 at 5.28.31 PM.jpg

“So they want to be fooled?” I asked.

“That’s probably not the wording I would use,” Dai said. “What I would say is that people—on some level—want to experience a unique, unexplainable mystery in a safe and fun setting. Who wouldn’t want that?

“Sure, if they feel like you’re trying to make them feel stupid or to lord your genius over them, then they may want to figure out your trick in order to take you down a notch. But if you present them with something really enjoyable and fascinating—that isn’t just about your specialnessthen I would look at them googling the trick as them trying to discern if what they just experienced was truly as wonderful as it initially seemed.”

“Just like the person looking under the table for the girl,” I said.

“Exactly. They need to look for a potential answer in order to contextualize how to feel about what they saw. If they get 50,000 results—even if they don’t learn the precise method—they may think of it as a cool trick, but probably not much more. It’s just something a bunch of magicians all over the world are doing. It’s nothing to get too worked up about. But if they get no results, then it’s going to fee like a rare, intimate, personal experience.”

“As magicians, we must expect people to try to put in a bare minimum of thought and effort in order to figure a trick out. In 2020, googling something is almost the least amount of effort someone could employ to figure something out.”

It was all clear to me now. “And that’s why you say we should no longer strive to have effects that can be described in one sentence. Because those are the most google-able effects we have.” The Ouija board nodded up and down. “Sooo… but wait… what’s the alternative? Convoluted effects? That doesn’t seem like a good option either.”

“No,” Dai said. “It’s not. I sometimes worry that magic is headed in a direction where magicians will start gravitating towards complicated multi-phase effects, because at least those can’t be unravelled with an obvious google search. But that’s not the answer. I think the answer is to put the effects in simple and compelling contexts that can help camouflage the effect, in a way. If you craft an experience for the person that feels like more than just the trick itself, you can sometimes charm and misdirect the person away from the basic effect. You can’t do it with every trick. Ring-flite, for example, might be one of those tricks that is doomed to forever be a simple google search away from being seen as ‘just a trick’ to the spectators. But a lot of tricks can be expanded on in a way that prevents that sort of thing. Do you know what you should read?”

Me: What’s that?

Dai: There’s this site called The Jerx.

Me: Uhm, Dai…

Dai: It’s great. The best writing on magic in the history of the art, and honestly, second place is not even close.

Me: Here’s the thing…

Dai: You’ll see him do this throughout his work. (You have to become a supporter though, to get the really good stuff. I don’t think he’s taking on any new ones at the moment, however.) You should see how he builds an effect up and how he builds it out. It’s really something. A true genius. I can’t say enough good things about him.

Me: Dai, I’m him.

Dai: You’re him? Him who?

Me: I’m the guy who writes the Jerx. I told you at the beginning I write a magic blog.

Dai: Yeah, but you told me your name was Susan.

Me: That’s when I was trying to coerce you into the Ouija-equivalent of cybersex. I thought you’d be more interested if I was female. But unbeknownst to you, I was going to put my beautiful dong through the hole in the planchette and see if you could move it around enough to get me off phantasmagorically. As I sit here now, spelling out this idea letter by letter, I can almost see how it might sound a little stupid to some people. But you can’t blame me for wanting to get freaky with the spirit of the finest close-up magician of the 20th century. Can you?

Me: Can you, Dai?

Me: Dai?

little_sister_ouija_planchette_banner_3.jpg