The Sealed Room With the Little Door

I spent much of the last 10 years working on my presentations for effects. And I've tested a lot of concepts with real people and one of the concepts I've tested the most is what my spectators respond to the strongest in regards to the implied method behind the trick. So, I looked at:

  1. A strong trick with no implied method.
  2. A strong trick with a believable implied method.
  3. A strong trick with an UNbelievable implied method.

And I consistently get the best initial reactions with 1 and 3. The most mild reactions with 2. And the most long-term reactions with number 3.

Here is why I think this is. I'm not saying the analogy I'm about to give is necessarily true, but it's how I picture things in my mind and it's true when I perform.

A very strong magic trick (where the spectators don't have any insight into the actual method) is like taking a person and sealing them in a square room with no windows or doors or any means of exit. When you give no explanation, people become trapped. They are amazed, but often, after a little while, they give up because there's no where for them to go. 

However, when you give them a believable explanation it's like putting them in a room with a door for them to walk out of. When you say, for instance, "I know where the coin is because I read your body language," you are giving them an exit. And they have two choices: 1. Feel trapped or 2. Walk through the exit you've given them. And so they will do number 2. (Not shit, I mean, they will go through the exit.) They may still be amazed ("That guy can read my body language!") but you are kind of sacrificing the mystery, in a way. And the mystery is the beguiling, interesting, frustrating, and long-lasting part of the magic trick.

Now imagine this, you're in a sealed room with a little tiny door the size of a cereal box. You're trapped, but there's this thing that beckons you as if it's an exit. Your rational mind knows it's not. You know you'll never fit through it, but you can't help but keep returning to it and shoving a hand or a leg out and seeing if maybe there's some way to work your way through. Rationally, you know it's not the way out, but it's the only thing that even suggests a way out, so your mind keeps returning to it. (In the same way you keep looking in your jacket pocket when you can't find your keys, even though you've already checked it five times. You know they're not there, but you can't imagine where else they could be.) This is, I think, the cruelest way to trap someone because they have the hope of escape and each time they reach out that little door and feel around in hopes of finding something that will let them out, it reinforces that they're trapped.

This is how I believe presenting magic with an unbelievable (yet internally logical) implied method affects people too. They know it doesn't provide the escape they need but it's something for them to explore when they feel they have no other option. And I feel like it's a way of fooling people multiple times with the same trick. You show them the trick and fool them, and then their mind looks for a logical explanation and when no logical explanation presents itself, they start poking around your unbelievable explanation (the little door) in their mind. "Okay, I know he didn't really stop time like he said... but maybe he stopped me perceiving the passing of time for a moment? Like maybe when he twirled that card he hypnotized me to not notice time passing? What the fuck am I saying, that's nonsense too." And every time they consider your unbelievable explanation, even partially, they are fooled again.

With a believable explanation you have two possibilities. 1. The spectator believes it, which is good for your ego, but not great entertainment, I don't think. 2. The spectator doesn't believe it and is put into the awkward position of wondering if you really want them to believe this somewhat believable explanation. For these people the believable explanation often seems less like a "presentation" and more like you're lying in order to impress them with some skill/power your don't really possess. Which a lot of you are, of course.

With an unbelievable presentation, you don't have this issue. They understand that you're doing this to entertain them, not to get them to "believe" anything. At least that's my experience. Do they still get caught up in it? Yes. You'll know this because they'll come back an hour later to poke some hole into your bogus explanation. "You said you found that metal disc in the wreckage of an alien spaceship when we were camping. But you couldn't have because I was with you the entire time." To which I'll either say, "Yeah, no shit, I was goofing around. It was just a magic trick." Or, "What are you talking about? I went for an hour hike by myself that night. Wait... you don't think they sent some kind of replicant in my place, did they? Oh my god, please tell me you didn't have sex with my alien cyborg doppleganger." 

Again, I'm not suggesting this is the right way to do things. Just my preferred way of doing things. For me it's more interesting and definitely more entertaining. Of course this is all on a spectrum. Some of my presentations are completely unbelievable, and some are partially believable. Some of the doors I give them will be just big enough to get their pinky through, and some they'll be able to poke their head through. But I always stop short of giving them something they could comfortably walk through.

Sundry Drive No. 5 - Re:Dougs - Redux

It's a special Daffydoug edition of Sundry Drive. Daffy, my readers can't get enough of you and your 10-year old email! 

I received this email from D.D. (not Daffydoug) wherein he solves a decade old mystery. A mystery less consequential than "What is the flavory of the mystery Dum-Dum?" but a mystery none-the-less. And that is, "What the hell did Daffydoug mean when he called me 'cardosian'?"

Andy,

Having studied economics in Santiago, Chile (ca. 2000-2001) during my senior year in college, I can tell you with some certainty that “Cardosian” refers to the former Brazilian president and marxist sociologist Fernando Henrique Cardoso.  Clearly, that doesn’t make any sense within Daffydoug’s rant so, given his penchant for misspelling, I tried googling “cardosian” with what I assumed to be its synonym: “devilish”.  And what did I get?  

Google: “Did you mean “Cardassian devilish”?

Well, I have no idea what Cardassian means, either!  But with just one more Google I find out it has to do with weird Star Trek characters!  Oh, “This must be it!," I think to myself.  Getting excited, I wiki CARDASSIAN!: (And I think we have our answer, Andy… excerpted From Wiki on “Cardassian"):

The Obsidian Order is a Cardassian intelligence organization in the Star Trek universe. Security Chief Odo of Deep Space Nine remarked that it was one of the most brutally efficient organizations in the galaxy, being even more ruthless than the Romulan Tal Shiar. The Order kept close tabs on all Cardassian citizens to ensure loyalty, and was greatly feared. It was said that the average Cardassian could not sit down to dinner without the contents of the meal being noted and logged by the Order. Odo also noted that the Order caused people to disappear for even less than eating something of which the Order did not approve, although this statement may have just been an exaggeration for effect.

You are greatly feared, Andy.

Sincerely,

DoubleD

I think that solves that. I mean, it's still no clearer to me what the hell he was talking about. But that goes for most of that email.


A.S. writes in to draw my attention to Daffydoug's Cafe profile...

I'm not sure you need to say your interests include  "magic" on a website devoted to people interested in magic. If you were on a site devoted to big titties, you wouldn't feel the need to proclaim your interest in big titties.

Some might think he's missing a comma, but I'm going to bet "ventriloquism chess" is a real thing. Like you play chess against a stuffed animal or some shit? So you always win or something. I don't know. I just know when I picture Daffydoug playing chess I imagine him picking up the two kings and smashing them together to "fight" like I used to do with my GI-Joes.

His interests also include: word and vocabular. That has to be another Start Trek thing, right? He didn't really mess up the wording to indicate his interest in words, did he? He never fails to disappoint. 


But then J.L. had to write in to inform me of a thread on the Cafe and totally bring me down.

Speaking of Daffydoug, did you know he used to carry his vent dummy around to amusement parks? there was a whole thread of him first telling people, then everybody saying he was a weirdo, then Daffy defending himself.

Some sad shit. 

Sad indeed! Look, Daffydoug, I think you're a good dude. I don't like to think of you roaming amusement parks looking for attention. I'd be happy to be your friend if you need someone to talk to. Yeah, I know you essentially wished cancer on me, but I don't have any hard feelings. It's not that I don't carry a grudge. It's that I feel no grudge in the first place. Sure, you may never look at me as anything other than your "orgulous, bovaristic young nemisis" but I have no ill-feelings to you at all. Or any of the other goofballs I used to make fun of on my old site: Steve Brooks, Glenn Bishop, You, the Cafe Staff member who was using the same screen-name in his magic groups as he was on alt.fan.cocksucking as he trolled for "bears" to fuck, or the kid who regaled us with his story of performing for some Chinese people with their "squinchy little eyes." I have great affection for all of you dips. Oh sure, I'd bash my skull in with a Thermos if I had to take a 20-minute bus ride with any of you as my seatmates, but that doesn't mean I have any real dislike for any of you. So if you're feeling lonely and contemplating a trip to the amusement park to... I don't know... pretend you work there?... and try and make friends with your dummy, you can always send me an email instead. We can play online ventriloquism chess or something. 

And It's Magic, If the Music Is Groovy

Here's a tip for all you ladies out there. When you're out on a date with a guy, and you're thinking of taking things to the next level, tell him you have a personal question that's "a little dirty." This will get him all wound up. Then ask him what kind of music he likes to fuck to. If he says anything like:

  • Let's Get It On by Marvin Gaye
  • Sexual Healing by Marvin Gaye
  • Can't Get Enough of Your Love by Barry White
  • Love to Love You Baby by Donna Summer

Just kindly excuse yourself to the restroom and then run home as fast as you can. That is not going to be a satisfying sexual experience. That's going to be two minutes of missionary and a sticky belly. 

Your fuck-mix is supposed to be songs with beats and intensities that are good for sex. It's not supposed to be songs about sex you goddamned knuckleheads! How cliched and uncreative can you be. Is this how people are with music in the rest of their lives?

"What song would you like us to play at the end of your father's funeral?"

"Thanks for asking. Could you play, 'I'm So Sad, 'Cause Daddy Died'?"

You're supposed to be scoring a situation. Not describing it. 

Magicians have a similar problem. Can we stop using songs about magic in magic performances? 

No more:

  • Abracadabra by The Steve Miller Band
  • Do You Believe In Magic by The Lovin' Spoonful
  • You Can Do Magic by America
  • Magic by Olivia Newton John
  • I Put a Spell On You by Screamin' Jay Hawkins
  • Magic Man by Heart
  • Magic by The Cars
  • Magic by Pilot

And so on. 

Or, if you feel the song has to be about magic, how about choosing a song that isn't completely fucked-out? I mean, unless you need the double whammy of obvious and hackneyed. Actually, for most magic shows, "Obvious and Hackneyed" would be a good subtitle. Or they could be a new magic duo.

Here, for the lazy, are some genuinely good "magic" songs that aren't completely played-out. 

God! Show Me Magic by The Super Furry Animals

Camilo (The Magician) by Said The Whale

Magician in the Mountains by Sunforest

Magic by The Blakes

Uri Geller by The Wannadies

Flashback to... The Time Daffydoug Flipped His Shit Because He Was Nominated For the Brooksy

Just a reminder to get in your nominations for the 2nd Magic Cafe Golden Idiot awards. They may take a different form this go-around. I think there are a lot less lovable idiots on the Cafe these days. So we may recognize other achievements instead. Dumbest thread. Worst post. Shittiest Avatar. Most pointless section on the Cafe. We'll see. I like calling an audible on these sorts of things. 

Thinking of the Brooksy awards reminded me of a highlight of the last time we did this. And that's when Daffydoug, after finding out he was in the running for dumbest member of the Cafe, whipped out his thesaurus and harnessed his anger into the email below and then dared me to publish it. I was delighted to do so. And if this is your first time reading it, you'll completely understand why. Below is the post from The Magic Circle Jerk, May 24th, 2004.


The Annotated Daffydoug

What follows is an e-mail I received from one of the nominees for the Brooksy, Daffydoug. I have added footnotes, but otherwise it is exactly as I received it. Enjoy.

Let me see if I have this correct now: One lucky contestant, if the stars are right, gets the coveted Magic Circle Jerk award, with all subsequent rewards and priveledges intact. 1

Those priveleges include #1; one hundred green backs out of your own pocket,* #2 one hundred bucks to spend at Penguin as, I assume, an honored "Penguinite" 2

Ahhh! But here's the catch!: The person, whoever they may be, is cleverly put into what you hope will be an "uncomfortable" little paradox. That paradox, reeking of the "genius" that conceived it, is this: If they take the money and give an acceptance speech, then they are, in a sense, admitting to their dumbness. If they don't take the money, then you imagine them at home , biting their lower lip, thinking, "Oh wretched man that I am! Oh, Woe is me!! " 3

This ensuing thought, this imagining, I presume, helps you, my facinorous friend, to get your rocks off. 4

Another way of saying it is this. You are attempting to put them in a position analogous to that of Quasimodo, in the classic old film "The Hunchback Of Notre dame", starring Charles Laughton (sp)5 

Remember that scene? The hunchback was crowned "King Fool", and the mob laughed at him, he being the only one to not realize the intent, gladly clowned around and paraded himself with the crown on his head, little realizing that he was a laughing stock, and even further not realizing that he was just making himself look more stupid. 6

That's the basic intent of your ploy, is it not? (Oh sorry, I forgot. I'm supossed to be so abysmally stupid that I can't even see through it. No way could I EVER concieve of having your astonishing perspicacity, my acuminous little friend! Do you wish for me at this point to do my impersonation of Mortimer Snerd or Beaky Buzzard? Your option, my orgulous, bovaristic young nemisis.. 7

Hell, you ARE one sly dog, aren't you? Aren't you proud? You are such a genius that I don't see how you can stand to look at yourself in the mirror without kissing your image!. When Wile Coyote called himself "super genius", he must have been thinking about YOU! 8

Seriously, man, I can almost SEE the little horns growing out of your head! How deliciously sardonic! How delightfully cardosian of you! You sly dog, you!! How long will you continue to regale us with your rapier like wit? How long will you continue to endear us with your eloquence an undeniable charm? Oh yes! When it comes to wit, you are undeniably the king! As Anna said to the king "Yes your majesty, no your majesty, tell us how high to go your majesty. Don't let us off of our knees your majesty. Give us a kick if you please your majesty!. Oh!! That was GOOD your MAJESTY!! " 9

Is your mama proud, or WHAT? After all, you've made your self KING of your own blog! 10

Now pardon me for a minute , while I go and throw up. 11

O.K. I'm back. Let's see, where was I? Oh yes! We were talking about your incredible ingenious plot to make me squirm. O.K. If it makes you feel better, here goes: (Drum roll please.) 12

I can feel the pain allready. OH MY GOD!! It's piercing through to the very depths of my inner soul! I feel it!! Oh PAIN!! Oh AGONY! Oh excruciating, hellish TORMENT!! God SAVE ME!! God SAVE me!! I'm In HELL! ARRRRGHHHH!! 13There. Did you get your rocks off yet? 14

I'll tell you what, Mr smart ass, here's one for you. I'll take your little wager, and I'll sweeten the pie. Here's what I'll do. Since my intelligence, and subsequently, my IQ has apparently been called into question by he who has set himself up as judge over his fellow man. Let's do it this way. If I win.(And IF a frog had wings he wouldn't bump his ass when he jumps) But I'm saying IF I win, I'll offer you a little challenge to see how godamn smart YOU are. 15

And I'll do it publicly, right on your blog site.(Providing you'll give me access.) (But of course you won't, because you don't have the guts.) 16

That's right. Let's settle this like real men do. With a little duel of wits, a little battle of IQs, as it were. And I name the terms, which I shall refrain from naming until the time come, should I win.. 17

Do you read what I'm saying? Well read my lips. I'll say it slower. PUT your Money where your big mouth is!. 18

That is, IF you think you are man enough. Personally, I don't believe in my heart that you'll go for it. I don't think you have the guts. No, I really don't. Why do I think that? Simple! Because people who talk about other people behind their backs, as you have done about me, are usually cowards, and blow hards, who can bloviate for endless hours about someone they despise, but are really, on the inside, whited sepulchers, clean looking on the outside, but on the inside, really just full of "dead men's bones" and other kinds of vile things. You are, in fact, full of the gall of bitterness. Bitter, bitter, bitter to the marrow of your bones. In fact, this is the very kind of bitterness and hatred that usually MANIFESTS ITSELF in the later years of a person's life as cancer, arthritis, arthersclerosis, or some other equally foul and vile disease. (Which, by the way, serves very nicely to illustrate how hideous and ugly these kinds of spiritual sicknesses really are. In other words, cancer is the very FACE of bitterness! All I can say is this: Keep on planting the seeds, and sure as the sun rises, in season, you'll get your harvest. May be ten years down the road, may be twenty, may be when you are very old, but it WIll happen. You can take it to the bank. Make no mistake about it. Ther'es an eternal law built into the earth that says that a man will harvest EXACTLY what he plants. Call it Karma, call it the "circle of Life", call it what you will, trying to buck it is like trying to jump out a ten story building and saying "I'm not gonna get splattered when I hit the pavement., because I am IMMUNE to that law!" The rest of us will just laugh as they are scraping you off of the pavement with a spatula. 19

Son, you "strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel" You are in fact, blinded by your own strife and bitterness. That's right. I said STRIFE. 20 

If you don't understand those sayings, then I would suggest you go some place,do some EXTREMELY deep soul searching, and gain a little wisdom, because as of now, you have demonstrated precious little. In fact, in the whole grand finiculatum of things, I would say, as George Baily said to Mr Potter, that you don't amount to much more than a "scurvey little spider." 21

BTW, Let's see if you have the guts to post this letter on your blog. Go ahead! I want all your little toadies to read it. UNEDITED! 22

*One hundred bucks out of your own pocket!! Hmmm. They used to say that cats and dogs are the dumb ones, but but I see them getting free meals and board, I see people bending over to pour FREE food into their little bowls. Don't cost the cat anything. It's FREE. Hmmm. Now let;s think here. Who's the one doing the serving here? And who's getting free stuff? Who's REALLY the dumb one here?? It's a no brainer. 23 

Don't matter though, because even if I do win your little contest, you won't ever give me the money. I don't believe that YOU are even THAT dumb! In fact, I will NEVER believe it until I see the money in my hand, providing I win your little "contest" 24

Annotations:

1. First, it's not the Magic Circle Jerk award, it's The Magic Cafe Golden Idiot award, aka The Brooksy. Second, and this is going to be an important theme in my critique, if you're writing an e-mail defending how intelligent you are, please, send that shit through spell-check. You don't want to be spelling privileges with a "d" in there. Now, granted, I misspell shit all the time, but I'm not trying to convince anyone how smart I am.

2. Again, it's privileges, try not to misspell the same word twice, in two different ways, two words away from one another. It's unbecoming. And while I understand you might not be up on your Civil War era slang, the term is greenbacks. One word. If it's two words you have the adjective "green" modifying "back" and it makes no sense. 

3. Hmmm, no, I didn't imagine anyone like that. Not until I got this e-mail, I mean. After reading this panicky, defensive e-mail, I do picture Daffydoug sitting home, shaking his fist at the sky, cursing me, cursing life, cursing this whole tainted orb.

4. Yes. I'm masturbating to this right now.

5. I like that only once in this hideously misspelled e-mail does he whip out the old "(sp)" trick. It's so funny and insufficient. It's like walking through a city that has been demolished by an earthquake and saying "Hey, that stop sign is crooked!"

6. Yeah, that was a sweet scene. Hey, do you remember in the remake of Dawn of the Dead how that one guy was shooting the zombies from the other rooftop and the other guy said he should shoot Burt Reynolds and then the first guy shot the zombie with a mustache? That was awesome too.

7. Misspelled words: supposed "supossed," conceive "concieve," nemesis "nemisis."

How could he misspell these simple words yet accurately spell perspicacity, acuminous, orgulous, and bovaristic? Well, obviously, he's poking around some website or book devoted to obscure words. That can be fun, and it can be fun to try and drop them into conversation because the words themselves are a conversation piece and we can all enjoy how varied and specialized the English language can be. But when you try to make yourself seem smart by using them over and over again, oddly enough, you actually end up sounding really stupid. Strange how that works. Maybe it's because trying to make yourself seem smarter by using long or unknown words is a standard thirteen-year-old thing to do and most thirteen-year-olds are pretty stupid.

8. I doubt that. I wasn't born yet. And he's a cartoon. Oh, and usually when someone calls himself something, he's thinking of himself.

9. Can someone please get their copy of the 2004 Word-A-Day calendar and tell me what the fuck cardosian means? Thanks!

10. I don't think my mother knows that I write a blog. And I didn't have to make myself king of my blog, I'm the only one who writes on it so I guess I'm king by default. 

11. Okay.

12. Brrrdddddddddttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt

13. Look, I understand you're trying to be facetious. And you're trying to imply that you're not really affected or bothered by all of this. And that's great, that's the way it should be, you shouldn't be bothered by a stranger saying you're a dope (or multiple strangers in this case). But if I had to guess which nominee was most bothered by this whole thing, I'd guess it's the one who sent me a 17k e-mail telling me how little he gave a shit about it.

14. I'm getting close. Don't stop. 

15. I really think "smart ass" should be hyphenated. And the phrase is "sweeten the pot" not "sweeten the pie" although that does sound tasty. 

16. I won't give you access, not because of a lack of guts but because people don't come to this site looking for your bullshit. They get enough of it at the Cafe.

17. I'm guessing it's a vocab competition.

18. You can see my response to his challenge in my reply to this e-mail.

19. In an e-mail full of dumb paragraphs, that one distinguishes itself without much elaboration. But why stop now? First, is writing about someone on a public blog really considered talking about them, "behind [their] back"? And why am I bitter (bitter, bitter to the marrow)? Because I think Daffydoug makes some dumb post on a message board? Well, fuck, Daffydoug, I'm not the only one who thinks it. The many, many people who wrote in to say what a dumb motherfucker you are seem to think it too (oh and that includes some of the staff at your beloved Cafe). What a cunt, what a Daffycunt. He's so self-absorbed that he thinks anyone who doesn't like his Magic Cafe posts is bitter and is going to get cancer! Oh, and did you not know that cancer is a "spiritual sickness" that only "bitter" folks suffer from? It's true, Dr. Daffydoug says so. So if you have a sweet aunt, or a loving parent who suffers or suffered with cancer, it's because they're bitter, miserable people. Daffydoug HAS to believe I'm bitter. He can't conceive of someone who is happy and has a lot of good friends and is active and kind to people and, at the same time, happens to think Daffydoug is a complete moron.

[Update 2015: Sadly, I believe Daffydoug, has dealt with some cancer issues in his family since he wrote this email. I don't know how those situations resolved themselves, but I truly hope things worked out for the best. And I hope he didn't exacerbate the problem with his poisonous, evil attitude about such situations being the sufferer's fault.]

20. Did he say strife? Wait, I guess he did.

21. I bet when Mr. Bailey said it that he spelled scurvy correctly. As far as finiculatum goes, he's got me stumped. He must be very intelligent to be able to look up an obscure word and then use it. Or maybe he made it up. Perhaps it's the Contrabulous Fabtraption of Professor Daffydoug.

22. Dear little toadies, I hope you've enjoyed daffydoug's e-mail. I was going to edit it to correct all the awful grammar and spelling mistakes but DD wants you to see it unedited.

23. Yes, Daffy, you are as smart as a cat or dog. I do not doubt that.

24. Oh my! Aren't you a bitter, bitter, bitter little man. Watch out, you're going to get cancer if you don't chill out a bit. Why would I lie about giving the money? How would that benefit anybody? Whoever wins will get paid via paypal so there will be a record of it.

For the sake of completeness, what follows is my reply to Daffydoug.

Doug,

I'm sorry you're so offended. Ultimately it was supposed to be all in fun. To quote my site: "I'm actually hoping that whoever wins has a good sense of humor about it and enjoys the whole thing."

And no, you're not supposed to be "so abysmally stupid" that you can't see through my "ploy." My ploy, as you describe it, was completely outlined on my site, so there's really nothing to see through.

I don't need to get into a battle to prove who's more intelligent. If someone wants to do that they can judge us by our past output. And honestly, I don't care if you think you're smarter than me, you may very well be. I don't care. I wish I did; it seems to mean so much to you. 

I know you need to think of me as bitter or  power-hungry or whatever, and I know no amount of remonstrations will convince you otherwise. But the truth is, I'm very happy, and I write the site because there is a group of people out there who seem to enjoy it. But it's a very small part of my life, and I'd be perfectly happy if nobody liked. I don't need that kind of validation.

I'd honestly love to post your e-mail, unedited, on my site. I'm really happy to post people who disagree with me. But I'll give you a day to rescind that offer because I'm sure you'll agree when you reread it that the tenor of your e-mail makes you sound kind of silly.

And there's no E in Brooksy.

Take care,

Andy

Dear Mentalists: Psychological Forces

I was watching a Penguin Live lecture last winter. It was by a mentalist. I want to say it was Art Vanderlay, but I'm not 100% sure so don't hold me to that. Whoever it was, he said something really stupid. And not as a joke. He said, if you want to psychologically force someone to think of the word "Rudolph" you should ask them to "Name a famous reindeer." 

How, I wondered, would this play out in the real word.

Magician: Madam, please name a famous reindeer.

Spectator: Rudolph.

Magician: Please, check below your seat. You'll find an envelope, and inside is the name Rudolph. Thank you, very much.

Spectator: Whaaaaattttt??? NO! FUCK ME, HOW COULD YOU EVER POSSIBLY HAVE KNOWN THAT!!! ARE YOU READING MY DIARY? I'VE NEVER TOLD ANYONE WHAT "FAMOUS REINDEER" I WOULD NAME! AND YOU WERE JUST ABLE TO PULL THIS INFORMATION OUT OF THE BLUE?? NO. GET AWAY FROM ME. YOU'RE SCARING ME. Okay, Karen, gotta think this through... is there any rational explanation? Think. Think!! NO! You sick fuck. Have you been following me for years? Getting to know my tastes and habits so you could predict which reindeer I would choose? Oh, no, wait... I know what happened. You secretly hooked me up to an MRI machine while I was sleeping one night in order to see which parts of my brain lit up when you asked my subconscious mind to name a famous reindeer. That's the only explanation.


I hate to break it to you, but there is only one famous reindeer. So if you ask someone to name a famous one, it's not that hard to predict which one you're going to get. I mean, there's only nine reindeer altogether that even have names, so you've eliminated the millions of reindeer we haven't gotten around to identifying yet. Then eight of the nine available choices are all of equal levels of renown. They could all be considered the least famous reindeer. So only one is relatively "famous." And this isn't something that only magicians know. Laypeople have cracked an US Weekly. They know it's not chock full of famous reindeer doing shit. They understand their choices for famous reindeer are fairly limited. 

You may think I'm harping on this one dumb idea, but I'm using it to illustrate a grander point and that is this:

There is a difference between a psychological force and a question with an obvious answer.

Mentalists got their heads stuck in their buttholes again and got confused by this notion. They thought if they were able to predict someone's answer to a question, then that's a psychological force. It's not.

Q: Name a tall building in New York City? 

A: The Empire State Building

Is this a psychological force? No, it's a question with one obvious answer. Sure, you can try and play it off as if you you're plucking this one idea from many. "The Empire State Building? Hmmm... well... if you say so. Most people say 432 Park Avenue or the HSBC Bank Building. But you said... what was it again? The Entire State Building? Oh... Empire. Got it. I'm just going to take your word for it that that's a real thing." You can go that route, but you look like a tool.

I blame Banachek and Teller. In the first Psychological Subtleties book, Teller mentions a routine in the introduction where he asks a spectator to think of a flower, she says "Rose" and then he shows that he predicted it. This rose "force" is used in other places throughout the book as well. I'm sorry, but this is not a trick. That's not to say that everyone will say "rose." But everyone who does say rose will just assume that everyone says rose. 

Often mentalists will put a lot of these shitty psychological forces together. So they'll ask a bunch of obvious questions and then show that they predicted all the answers. They compound the obviousness of this technique by doing it over and over and over. They think this is good structure. It's not. 

There are, of course, some great psychological forces, and some good routines out there that are combinations of these forces. But you have to be careful, because if you mix good psychological forces with bad ones, then you taint the good ones, you don't elevate the bad ones.

Here's how to test if you have a good psychological force. It's not a one-step process. It's a two-step process. First you try it out on a bunch of people and see if the response rate is what you find acceptable. And that will differ from performer to performer. Let's say your acceptable hit-rate is 80%. You try out your force and you realize that it exceeds that percentage. Great. But now you have to go to step two of the testing procedure. You go to your friends and ask, for example, "If I asked 100 people to name a flower, what do you think the overwhelmingly most popular answer would be?" In this instance they will say, immediately, "Rose." That's because it's a bad psychological force. An immediate answer = bad psy force. If they have to think about it for a few moments, then it might be a good force. If they say, "I have no idea," then it's possibly a very good psy force.

Let me be clear. The second step of the testing is not to ask people the psychological force question again. It's to ask people how they think other people would answer the question. You're testing how obvious your hit answer is. Mentalists hate testing things like this. They hate it because they like to pretend they really know how people's minds work. But a lot of them don't. In fact they often seem to have the least insight into how a spectator's mind works than performers in any other branch of magic. Fortunately I'm here to help them out.

Along those lines, here are some other things that aren't psychological forces:

"Name a famous current President of the U.S."

"Name the first answer that comes to your mind when I say 9 + 3."

"Who's your favorite person occupying your physical space and wearing your clothes at this very moment?"

The Defect In the Carbonaro Effect

The Carbonaro Effect returns to Tru Tv tonight, for those of you in the U.S. If you haven't watched it, I recommend it. It's a lot of fun, and not just because when you google "cabonaro effect," Google wants to auto-complete to "carbonaro effect racist."

If you haven't seen it, it's essentially a show that uses magic methods to prank people. It's an outgrowth of a segment Michael used to do on The Tonight Show when Jay Leno was hosting, as in the clip below. (This gives me hope that we'll one day see an hour-long Iron Jay show, because that bit was hilarious.)

The show is pretty funny and good-natured and hardly racist at all. You can find a bunch of clips on youtube to get a taste for it.

My favorite part of the show though is when he has to explain to the person at the very end that they've just been on The Carbonaro Effect. Candid Camera was on the air for 50 years so they could just say to the person, "Smile, you're on Candid Camera!" And that person would be like, "Got it. Okay. That clears up everything." But when you say "The Carbonaro Effect" to most people, it means nothing. So there's this nice long explanation that follows the final set-up for the show. And it becomes even more convoluted because at first he works in the phrase "Carbonaro Effect" casually. I guarantee there was some executive at Tru TV who was like, "Can't we just call this show, Magic Trick'd? Then at the end we can just say, 'You got Magic Trick'd!' and we can all go home and get on with our lives?" Instead every episode ends with something like this...

Victim: Damn. That shit was crazy!

Michael: Do you know what it's called when you shrink down someone's car to the size of a pea, put it in a slingshot, and shoot it to the other side of the parking lot?

Victim: Naww... what's it called?

Michael: The Carbonaro Effect.

Victim: Ok, if you say so.

Michael: It's also the name of a hidden camera, magic television show.

Victim: Sounds good, I'll check it out.

Michael: A hidden camera, magic, television show that pranks people. 

Victim: Mmhmmm.

Michael: Like the one you're on right now.

Victim: No, I'm at the parking garage. 

Michael: No... I mean, yes, you are, but what I'm saying is, you're on The Carbonaro Effect. And it's a hidden camera, magic, prank show. That you are on, at this moment.

Victim: Ohhhhhh!!!! I get it. This is a prank show?

Michael: That's right!

Victim: Cool. Who are we gonna prank? Let's get Rodney.

Michael: No, no, no. We just pranked you.

Victim: You did?

Michael: Yes. Remember when I said I shrank your car down to the size of a pea, and put it in a car-slingshot and I sent it to the other end of the parking lot?

Victim: Yeah, that just happened. 

Michael: That was a prank.

Victim: No. It just happened, I saw it.

Michael: Right, but it was a prank.

Victim: I'm not following.

Michael: You are now on a hidden camera show called the Carbonaro Effect.

Victim: The what Effect?

Michael: Carbonaro.

Victim: No, it was a car-slingshot.

Michael: What?

Victim: It wasn't a car bow and arrow, it was a car slingshot

Michael: No, no, no. Carbonaro. Look, my name is Michael Carbonaro.

Victim: Ok.

Michael: I'm a magician.

Victim: Got it.

Michael: I have a hidden camera, magic, prank show on Tru Tv.

Victim: Cool, cool, cool.

Michael: We are shooting that show at this very moment.

Victim: Nice.

Michael: With you as the victim of the prank. 

Victim: Oh... OH!!!! Okay, I hear you. Haha. Okay, I get it now. 

Michael: You got it? Great. Will you sign this release?

Victim: So what you're saying is...

Michael: Yeah?

Victim: Everything that just happened...

Michael: Right.

Victim: With the car, and shrinking it down, and putting it in a slingshot, and then having my car reappear from the other end of the parking lot...

Michael: Yeah, all of that.

Victim: That was all just...

Michael: Yes.

Victim: 100% real?

Help An Idiot Win An Award... Again!

Guys, it's that time again. Time for you to make your nominations for the not-even-close to being annual Magic Cafe Golden Idiot awards. Also known as The Brooksy. This is the time when we celebrate the dumbest people on the Magic Cafe. It's an embarrassment of riches. I launched the Brooksy Awards back in 2004. The winner that year was Djvirtualreality. A true bonehead of the highest order.

But Djvirtualreality has held that honor long enough, so it's time we crown a new Golden Idiot. That's where I need your help. Here is how it works, paraphrased from the original nomination post many years ago...

I'm going to open my e-mail box to suggestions as to who is the dumbest member of The Magic Cafe forums. What I'd like you to do is nominate a person and give two or three examples of why you believe this person to be the supreme idiot. I'll gather these suggestions and narrow the field down to five and have a big nominee announcing post. Then people will be able to vote for those nominees for a certain period of time, and eventually we'll have a winner. The winner will receive $100 cash. They will also be given the opportunity to write an acceptance speech that I will post here for all to read. 

So send in your suggestions for who should be the next winner of The Magic Cafe Golden Idiot award. Cafe staff member are not eligible to win as they would run away with the competition. Any posts that you reference in your nominations should have been made before 3:00 AM EDT 7.28.2015.