Ancient Chinese Secret, Huh?

A JAMM subscriber sent me footage of him performing Mind-Reading, My Sweet from issue #1. Or, at least, the end of that trick where the prediction is revealed. It's very enjoyable to me to see someone other than myself try out one of these more oddly structured effects. That trick is a good example of what I discussed last Friday, where structural weaknesses of a trick are subsumed by the presentation. There will be more discussion on that trick in the Letters to the Editor section of Issue #2.

I'm mentioning it today because the ideas that follow are related to that effect. One of them (the one I don't particularly like) was the precursor to that effect. And one of them (the one I really like) evolved along side of it. Neither of the ideas I'm about to discuss are actually possible at this time because they would require apps that don't exist. However, they might be interesting ideas to think about just in a brainstorming sort of way. 

I have a gazillion ideas for apps. Hell, I've been coming up with ideas for computer software and stuff like that since I was in 6th grade and wrote up a parody version of Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego called Who In the Fuck Is Sherman Sanfrancisco. That is a good example of the issue with my app ideas, they really only appeal to me and maybe 6 other people. The Jerx App is the one idea I had with a more universal appeal, and that's because it's so simple and can do so many things. But most of my ideas are more along the lines of Breakfart, the app you fart into and it tells you what you had for breakfast.

So let's talk a little about the common ancestor that Mind-Reading, My Sweet and the effect that ends this post have in common. 

I had an idea where you would be able to predict anything a spectator names. Well, not you, but an incredible Chinese mentalist that you've been corresponding with. You could call him the great Foo Ling Yu. Congrats, now you're a comedy magician.

So you have a sealed envelope that this mentalist has sent you and you ask your friend to think of anything. For example, you ask her to think of a gift she once received. The best one, the worst one, or just any memorable gift. Your friend names a stuffed-animal turtle her dad gave her before he committed suicide.

"Ooooohhh sheeeee-it...," you say as you slink backwards out of the room.

I'm just kidding. She just says it was a stuffed turtle her dad got her for Valentine's day when she was 8.

You hand her the envelope and ask her to open it.

She does and finds a letter printed in Chinese characters.

"Oh crap," you say. "Normally we correspond over email and it automatically translates everything. Uhm... do you have a translation app on your phone?" She doesn't, so you open one on yours that translates whatever it sees through the camera. You set it to translate from Chinese to English and have her hold it over the letter. It translates it and the letter says, "I'm having a premonition of you meeting with a beautiful red-haired girl [or whatever describes your spectator]. When asked to think of a gift from her past, she will think of a turtle. I am very confident in this. Please use this information wisely."

At the end of the night she can take the letter with her and anyone who reads Chinese can verify what it says.

So, if it's not obvious, it's essentially a fake translation app. You print out a letter that has everything except the thought of object written in Chinese. Then when you open the app you secretly code what the thought of word is when you set the app to translate into English. Your spectator can watch you do this and see nothing suspicious. If you don't understand what I'm getting at, you can see this kind of covert input in this old Google trick

So the app asks you what language to translate into and you, apparently, type English. The app now knows the object the person is thinking of and inserts that into the translation that it overlays on the letter.

Ideally what would also happen when you secretly input their word is that a duplicate letter would print off, wirelessly, from your printer in another room. Then it's just a matter of swapping the letters at some point in the evening so she can take the letter home with her.

As far as ideas go, it's not that great. It lacks the charm of the non-app presentation used in Mind-Reading, My Sweet. I've seen the reaction that trick gets first hand, and now I've seen the reaction another person has had with it. And while it's not a particularly satisfying method for magicians, I find it to be a very satisfying unfolding of events for the spectator, and completely baffling assuming you handle the one move invisibly.

But it did lead to another idea which I really like, but again, it would require a custom app that would probably have limited appeal.

Ancient Chinese Secret, Huh?

Imagine this, a friend is visiting your house, he notices a new framed poster hanging in your living room. It's a paragraph of Chinese characters. He asks what it's all about.

You ask him if he can read Chinese at all, he says he can't. That's okay, you tell him, and you ask him to stare at the poster while you have him imagine the following scenario. 

"I want you to imagine you're an 8-year-old boy. You live in a rural part of southern China. One day you are walking home from school and off in the distance you see a clearing with an object sitting all by itself in the middle of it. You walk up closer and closer to the object until finally you can see what it is. What is it?"

"I don't know," he says.

"Just name the first thing that comes to your mind," you say.

"Uhm... a pickle," he says.

"Great." You ask him to stand next to the poster and you take a picture of him with it and text it or email it to him.

"I want you to find someone who can read Chinese and ask them what that says," you tell him.

A couple days later he reaches out to a professor at a local university and sends her the picture and asks her what the poster says. 

She writes back...

It says, "I was an 8-year-old boy. I lived in a rural part of southern China. One day I was walking home from school and off in the distance I saw a clearing with an object sitting all by itself in the middle. I walked up closer and closer to the object until finally I could see what it was. It was a pickle. While it did not seem like the most significant incident of my youth, I decided to print it up and put it on a poster because you never know what will turn out to be a magical moment."

How? 

This would be a variation on Aurasma, which is an augmented reality app. [Update: This is no longer active.] Essentially you can tell your camera to replace any object with another object when you're using it to take a picture. So, for example, you could set it up so anytime you have your camera aimed at a Bicycle joker, it would replace the image of the joker with the three of spades (or whatever). That's just a dumb card trick example. 

Here you would set it up so the image to be replaced would be the poster image, and it would replace it with an identical image except with the symbol for whatever word the spectator chose included in the text. Or, perhaps it could just replace a single Chinese character from the poster with the appropriate one to make the "prediction" accurate. Whichever looks better. You would need an app for this, of course.

So, your friend comes by, notices the poster. You tell them the story and have them say what they see in their imagination. Then you take a picture of him with the poster. As you go to take the picture you would type in whatever word he said into the app. Then the app would swap in the appropriate character for the incorrect character in the poster--augmented reality style (and ideally feather the image and balance the colors so it blended in well).

You take a picture, send it to your friend's phone and let him take it from there. I always like a trick that concludes when you're not around.

Damn Lies

If you own Marc Kerstein's WikiTest, you can click on the image below to download my take on the effect. It's not profoundly different, just a slightly altered presentation and method to take the effect out of the mentalism genre (I have enough mentalism tricks) and into a moderately absurdist 5-minute presentation piece.

The password for the pdf: Go to the WikiTest app > Go to Instructions > Go to "The Method" > Scroll down to the last paragraph, it's the word after "remotely" in lowercase letters. 

I don't know if it's the type of thing that will appeal to anyone who isn't me but I have a lot of fun performing it, so someone else might too. 

Gardyloo #18

My little sweeties... it's Valentine's Day tomorrow! You know those weird, creepy tricks that mentalists like where they try to imply that the reason for the trick's success is the "strong connection between the two of us"? Go perform one of those for your wife, for god's sake. Help in the fight against weirdos using magic. 

"This trick works because of our strong connection." Between you and someone you're not in a relationship with = you're a giant weirdo.

"This trick works because of the strong connection between the two of you." A zillion times better. But I often wonder how many people have had their signed card merge with the signed card of someone whose face they can't fucking stand anymore. Other than a situation where I really know the people, I don't like to imply their "bond" is causing the magic. Even at a wedding, I need to really be in on the situation between the two. I've been to some weddings where the participants were like, "Well... this is a big mistake. I know it. You know it. Everyone here knows it." I mean, that was the feeling in the air. That wasn't part of the vows or something. So I'm careful about that sort of thing. Just my philosophy.

"This trick works because of our strong connection." Between you and someone you love in a healthy relationship. I'm all for that. Be a sweetie. Do magic for someone like that.


Seriously, dude, if your name is Mark Sherman, and you live in Washington state, all my emails to you get bounced back. Get in touch with me and give me an alternate email address. Maybe your're dead. Or—it's your work address—so maybe you got fired. In either case, getting your JAMM subscription is probably not foremost on your mind. Hell, perhaps you got fired for getting things like your dirty amateur magic magazine subscription sent to your work address. I don't know. Just get in touch so we can clear it up.

Also, this goes for everyone, if I haven't responded to an email in regards to a specific issue between us, and it's been more than a couple of days, don't hesitate to get back in touch. I don't like to leave things dangling, so if I have, it means I've either lost track of the issue or I misunderstood something and thought something was taken care of that wasn't, so feel free to bring it back up with me. 


 

 

Reader Thomas Hodgson created this letter for his performance of Rest In Pieces. 

While the letter made perfect sense for him because it was performed near the beginning of the year, if you want to use it you may need to justify the "new year" as a new year of the service. "Yes, the service started in September of 2011. So this is the first puzzle for year seven." Or whatever.

You can download the pdf for these here.


I'm going to be conducting some magic-related focus-groups within the next couple of weeks for a project that is not primarily related to this site. We may have some extra time with the groups so if there is a trick or concept that you'd like tested in front of real people who are being paid for their brutal honesty, let me know.  

It would have to be something fairly quick to demonstrate and then get feedback on, however, because our time is limited.


The writing credit for The Amateur at the Kitchen Table in the January table of contents for Genii is nice and confusing.

It's got a real "Rambo First Blood Part Two" vibe to it.

Also, is "Andy" really a pseudonym? Is "John" a pseudonym for John Lovick?

If it helps I'll use my full name around here. It's His Honor Count Captain Andrew Winthrop von Munthe af Morgenstierne IV, B.V.M. 

Also, does anyone know if I'm the only person to get two books reviewed in Genii in consecutive months? I think I'm going to claim that I am. Who cares if it's true. No one is going to look it up.


A little Valentine's magic trick I put together. Would you believe you can do this in real life for someone? You can. I mean, there will be a giant box of chocolate on the ground at the end of the trick, but you can definitely do it.


The Hidden Benefit of the Unbelievable Premise

I've written before about how I prefer to present tricks with unbelievable implied methods. That is to say, the premise of the effect—what's causing the effect—not the actual method itself. I've spelled this out most clearly in this post.

I'm sure I went through a period, probably soon after Derren Brown came on the scene, where I thought it would be cool if people believed I was doing these things for real. That I was truly controlling their mind or reading their body language or something like that. But that didn't last too long for me. I think it's a style that obviously works amazingly well for Derren, but the idea that it could just work equally well for any other idiot who adopted it is kind of dismissive of everything uniquely "Derren" that he brings to the table. And I think it's a style that falls horribly flat for the amateur performer. "Oh, look. Apparently Timmy is now a mental mastermind. The kid who swallowed a roll of pennies to hear them jangle in his stomach is now able to tell me what memory I'm concentrating on based on my micro-expressions. Okay. Sure." I mean, if you're doing it as a goof, that's fine. But I've only ever seen people play it straight.

I'm at the point where I'm disappointed if people believe what I'm telling them. Sometimes when I'm with someone who's a little... spacey... what I consider a fantastical premise, she might think has some validity. "Of course you could tell the emotion I was concentrating on by reading my aura," she'll say, or words to that effect. So I'm constantly pushing my effects into weirder and weirder directions because I don't want them to be believed. 

But here's a dirty secret. Even if you do want people to believe you have some special powers, you're better off not saying, "I'm psychic." That's just a challenge to people. You're better off giving it some absurd explanation and then letting people back themselves into the idea that maybe it's something "real." On more than a few occasions I've heard someone say—either directly to me or second-hand—"Well, yeah, no shit, obviously he wasn't serious when he said he could do what he did because he had a blood transfusion from a werewolf. But how does he do it? Is he hiding something?" Not in those exact words, of course. But the notion that maybe there was something legitimately unnatural going on, and I was hiding it behind a bogus explanation, is something that comes up. It's not my intention to create this interpretation of events, but I'm fine with this jumble of truth and fiction and I can appreciate all the different layers of reality going on. I'm doing something fake and saying that it's real, but the thing I'm claiming is real sounds so obviously unreal that maybe I'm just hiding something real behind the guise of something unreal.

One huge hidden benefit of unbelievable premises, is that they can be used to disguise a method. And this is something I use all the time. I'll give you a simple example. Let's say we're at the public library. It's a big brightly lit place. I decide I'm going to float a dollar for you. I want to get into the shadows to hide the thread better so I tell you to follow me over to the corner (where it's not so bright). Then I levitate the bill (via "magic" or "mind power"). 

This is, possibly, a fine trick. But what you'll find when you perform for the same people over and over is that, while they may not be able to deconstruct your tricks, they can often become very good at spotting unjustified actions. "Why did he pick up the deck just to set it down again?" "Why did he have me put two coins in my hand in order to vanish one?" Or, as in the example above, "Why did he bring me over to this corner to float a bill?" These are all unnecessary expenditures of energy. And sometimes spectators can follow that thread of suspicion to at least a partial method. Some people are just naturally attuned to spot inconsistencies, and some people just become more relaxed the more often they're put in the position of being a spectator. Just as you become more comfortable performing the more you do it, people become more comfortable watching magic the more they do it. And that can cause them to question things that someone who is less comfortable watching magic will let slide. This is an issue the amateur performer has that pros encounter less. 

But here's where the unbelievable premise comes into play. If you make that questionable action part of an unbelievable premise, then it becomes not only justified, but it becomes dismissed as anything of consequence. They just see it as part of the fiction of the presentation; part of the thing they can ignore if they're looking for clues to the "reality" of what's going on. It's like sneaking out a prisoner in a load of laundry. 

Let's go back to the library. Now instead of dragging you to the corner for no reason to float a bill, I tell you to come over by biographies (that same darkened corner). "There's a lot of spiritual energy here because of the old books documenting the long dead." I have you choose a book and we tear a dollar sized chunk out of one the blank pages in the back (I'll make a donation to the library to cover it). We harness the spiritual energy and it begins to float. 

Now you don't question why we came to this part of the library to float a piece of paper. Instead you dismiss it as being part of the story I was establishing. If your intention is to unravel the trick, I've snuck part of the method past you disguised as presentation. 

In his review of JV1, Jamy Swiss said the presentation for The Miracle Worker (which was the updated version of this post) "might well amount to the most perfect misdirection for a Center Tear that you have ever encountered." And why? Because it adds a number of layers to the handling of a center tear that makes it easier (you can do it slowly, and you can take as much time as you want staring at the paper), but it disguises those layers in presentation. 

Now, I'm never suggesting people adopt the style I use. If you want people to think you're the real deal, that's cool with me (even if I think that's a psychological disorder). I'm just pointing out one of the not-so-obvious benefits of a presentation that provides an unbelievable context for a trick. When I have an effect with a weakness or a certain performing condition that needs to be met, I will always try and incorporate those things into such a presentation. 

And unfortunately, you can't hide your method in presentation if you want your premise to be taken as real. That does the exact opposite. It shines a spotlight on those questionable moments. You're opening your premise to scrutiny, and hence your method to more scrutiny.


If you own Marc Kerstein's WikiTest, I'd like to show you how I use this concept with that effect. My use of that app is just slightly different in effect, method, and presentation and it leaves a little memento of the effect at the end—not a "souvenir" because I don't expect anyone to keep it— but just an interesting physical reminder of what has happened. Don't get me wrong, WikiTest is pretty much perfect as is. But I like the presentation I've come up with because it fits my style, addresses a potential weakness in method, and allows for something a little different than presenting it as a mind-reading demonstration. 

If you're interested, I'll be making my handling available via a free pdf download for owners of the effect on this site next Tuesday.

A Firm Background In Remembering

Coming in the JAMM #2

A Firm Background in Remembering

I came up with this simple effect last summer and since then it has been one of my favorites for everyday performing. (It's nearly impromptu, just requiring some pocket change). It's incredibly practical, deals with a subject that is inherently interesting (memory and how it shapes our reality), and has a very satisfying moment where the effect is completed at a point where your spectator is convinced it hasn't begun yet.

Skill level: Beginner
Time to perform: 4 Minutes

Subscribe here to support this site and receive the JAMM every month.

It's A Major Award!

If you came up to me five years ago and said, "The Jerx, Volume One is going to win the Tarbell Award," I would have said, "Are you having a stroke? None of those words make any sense to me." 

"In the future you have a blog again," you'd say.

"Word?" 

"And it's called The Jerx."

"The jerks?"

"No. The Jerx. With an X. (Don't ask how I know you just said it with a KS and not an X.) It's like a play on The Jinx."

"Oh, that's clever. That's much better than the name that was rattling around in my head for years that I thought I'd revive the site under."

"What was that?" you'd ask.

"Annemann's Oven," I'd say. "I heard he committed suicide by sticking his head in the oven. So I was going to call it Annemann's Oven. 'See what's cooking in Annemann's Oven.'"

"That's a little disrespectful."

"Eh...."

"So, you have this site called The Jerx and you wrote a book called The Jerx, Volume One."

"Okay. What is it exactly? It's like my old blog? Like a book with a bunch of pictures of old magic manuscripts with dirty sounding names?"

"No," you'd say. "It's a book of routines and essays."

"Huh.... And it wins an award?"

"Yes. The Tarbell Award."

"What's that?"

"It's the Magic Cafe's award for the best magic book of the year."

"I win an award on the Magic Cafe?"

"Yes."

"I'm not following. Did Steve Brooks die or something? I always was worried about his cholesterol. So he dies and the Cafe is taken over by someone in magic who's friendly to my work? Does Tyler Wilson buy the Magic Cafe or something?"

"No," you'd say. "Steve is fine. And I do mean fine." Letting me know you're not only gay, but you have wildly questionable taste in men. "He just allows the voting and doesn't interfere with the results."

"Really.... So what happens? I write a post and get everyone to go to the Cafe and flood the voting thread with votes for me? Completely invalidating the thing?"

"Well," you'd say, "I won't say that's something you don't consider at some point. But in the end you just decide to let it play out organically."

"And I win? That's great. I must be incredibly popular."

"No. Not at all."

"Aw, rats." I'd say. "Well, at the very least this suggests I might get a cover story in MAGIC Magazine."

"Uhhhh..."

"Yes, MAGIC Magazine. That immortal institution. How nice it will be to get a cover story there. That way, in 100 years when people are still reading MAGIC Magazine, perhaps they'll stumble over my old article in some back issue. Yes, that's all I hope for. A MAGIC Magazine cover story. Maybe a speaking spot at that year's Essential Magic Conference. Some support for a brand new idea I have involving weekly live online magic lectures. An appearance on whatever insanely popular Criss Angel show is on TV (so happy to know his star will never fade). A shopping spree at Hank Lee's. And perhaps a celebratory dinner with some of my magic idols: Tom Mullica, Irene Larsen, Paul Daniels, Aldo Colombini, and Montecore, the tiger who bit Roy's head off. That's all I ask."

"Err... uhm..."

"What's the problem?"

"Nothing. It's just... nothing."

"Well, this is great news. Obviously once I win I'll sell a ton more books and make a nice little return on my investment of time."

"Yeah, about that. You only printed a very limited amount and they're almost gone by the time this happens."

"Aw, fuck me."

"Sorry."


So, The Jerx, Volume One won the 2016 award for Best Magic Book over on the Cafe. Please preface my name with Tarbell Award Winner in all future dealings with me.

I wanted to thank the people who voted, although awards—or for that matter, recognition of any kind—aren't really my scene, I'm just glad people enjoyed the book. If I'm proud of anything it's that the book probably sold less copies than any other book in that thread, and yet it got the most votes by a wide margin. A small group of ardent fans has always been more what I want than a broad group of casual fans.


And congratulations to my friend and Jerx App creator, Marc Kerstein who won the Trick of the Year for his amazing Wikitest effect.

The Jerx extended family is taking over.

We run this town now.

 

 

A Word From Our Sponsor

[For those new readers, or those who read on their phone and don't see the sidebar. New posts are put up Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Tuesday and Thursday are "sponsored" posts. You can expect that they'll be sponsored, for the most part, by me. I'll be telling you what's coming up in The JAMM and other ways for you to contribute to the site.]

A change of plans regarding the JAMM release schedule. Originally I had intended to have it come out the first Saturday of the month. I realize now that a shifting release date would be a pain to manage from a records keeping point of view. So now it will come out the 6th of every month. Subscriptions that are placed after the 6th will start with the following month's issue. 

I've been getting a lot of positive feedback regarding JAMM #1 and some of the ideas and suggestions you've sent in will appear in issue #2.

In the March JAMM I review a product that I consider the best thing I've purchased in years and it's under $15.

What is it? Is it Foot Roulette? I bet it's Foot Roulette.

No. No, it's not Foot Roulette. You'll read about it in the next issue.

I really appreciate those who have subscribed already. If interest and support continues to build, then this is something that will just get bigger and better. For just 33 cents a day... the price of the shittiest cup of coffee you've ever had...you can assure this site sticks around and that you have access to the magazine and bonus content as well. You're not just tossing money at some monolith company that doesn't need it. You're helping a tiny new-media magic organization, that is essentially one guy with occasional assistance from a few friends, put out consistent content. Think of it like you're buying me a Wendy's Spicy Chicken combo once a month (that's most likely what I'm going to spend your money on anyway) to support what I'm doing here specifically for you. Because that's essentially how i see it. I know pretty much every subscriber's name. I interact with many of you over email. To me this is just an extension of the emails I would share with my magic buddies pre-blog. But it's just more consistent, time-consuming and with more production costs. So if you're inclined to subscribe, please do.

If you think, "Well, $10 a month isn't too bad... but do I really need another magic magazine?" I have a confession. It's not really a "magazine magazine." Think of it as a 300+ page ebook done in the style of a magazine that's released in 12 installments. 

And your $10/month makes it possible for another couple hundred posts on this site over the course of a year.

And you're getting The Jerx deck of cards that is so limited edition and will be so rare it will make Jerry's Nuggets look like this deck of Minnesota Timberwolves playing cards that sells for a penny.

And subscribers will be getting other bonuses along the way as well.

More on that to come!