Diary, Cha Cha Cha

When your tummy’s feeling funny
And your pants are hot n’ runny


Here's me as a smart, but dumb, 13-year-old, not knowing how to be a magic spectator when a guy was showing me a trick at one of the only magic conventions I've ever gone to.

Him: Do you know how a deck of cards is like a calendar?

Me: Uhm... they're both made of paper?

Him: A deck of cards—

Me: They have numbers?

Him: A deck of cards has two colors—

Me: My grandma has an old one that she should replace?

Him: Huh? No. Listen. This is the patter.

Me: Oh! I thought it was a riddle or something.

Him: A deck of cards has two colors. Red and black, representing day and night.

Me: A calendar doesn't track day and night.

Him: And it has four suits, like the four seasons.

Me: Okay.

Him: And it has 52 cards, like the 52 weeks of the year. 

Me: Huh... interesting.

Him: And it has 13 values per suit, like the 13 lunar cycles.

Me: Lunar cycles!

Him: And—

Me: That's a stretch.

Him: But the most—

Me: Like... sure... what's a more common way to think of the way a calendar is broken up than lunar cycles. C'mon man.

Him: Stop. Hold on. But the most interesting thing is if you add up all the values, you get 364. And if you add the joker you get 365, the number of days in a year.

Me: Aren't there two jokers?

Him: Well, yeah. But we add one to get 365.

Me: Oh...It seems like it didn't work out there at the end really. And if we add a joker, aren't we now talking 53 cards which spoils the number of weeks in a year thing?

This was my introduction to the Diary Effect and also my introduction to the fact that magicians don't actually like to be talked to when they're performing. I mean, they didn't get into magic because they were great at interacting with people.


When your stomach starts a rollin' 
and you're cleaning out your colon


The Diary Effect is this: A spectator names a date and then they look that date up in a datebook that has a card next to every date. I just used the word date four times in that sentence. Sorry. Anyway, they look up their date and next to it is a card, and you show that you've predicted the card in some way. 

I find this trick gross. I realize that's weird to say. And don't think I don't understand that my views on magic are somewhat idiosyncratic. I sometimes wonder how this site has any regular readers at all. 

One time I was in Virginia, with a buddy of mine who also does magic. We were on a snowboarding trip and staying at a friend's house. My magician friend was performing a diary effect for the owner of the house and, as he performed it, I was rolling my eyes and making faces. Really trump'ing it up.

And my friend was laughing because he knows I hate the effect and I was being a baby about having to sit through it. Later he asked me why I disliked it so much and I said, "Ah, it's such phony, fake bullshit."

"Phony, fake bullshit!" he said. "You just spent 20 minutes communicating with her dog like Son of Sam!"

[Son of Sam the Bellhop

Effect: I used to do a drawing dupe effect where the spectator would draw an image and show it to her dog while I was out of the room, then I'd "talk to the dog" and reproduce the drawing. Then we'd put the dog out of the room, she'd freely name any card in the deck. We'd spread the cards all over the floor (face up... the dog's not a mindreader). I would go out of the room and "talk to the dog" and he would come bouncing in and pick up the card in his teeth.

Method: Any drawing dupe you want. And then smearing a little wet dog food on the back of a playing card.]

But, to me, those two effects are completely different. "This dog is talking to me and telling me to kill people. And now I will prove that we're talking to each other," is obviously fiction. But it's an entertaining fiction. And it's logical fiction.

On the other hand, "A deck of cards is kind of like a calendar. So now I have this date book with a card next to each date." What is that about? We often talk about how we should really do tricks with "normal objects." And we interpret that to mean, "Don't use Tenyo tricks." Or, "Don't use a Wow gimmick." But a datebook with a card on every date is just as sketchy. More-so, even. A Wow gimmick I can pass off as some bizarre piece of new technology my uncle snuck out his government job. I can make up something for it because it isn't anything. But a datebook with cards in it is just you putting together some dumb prop for the sake of a trick. 

And just the premise of the trick is goofy too. If you're trying to show you can predict what date they would name, then predict what date they would name. If you're trying to show you can predict what card they would select, ask them to name a card. Why the extra step?

Honestly, as a spectator, if someone took out their datebook, you might get pretty interested. "Oooh... what is this about? A trick about time and dates? Am I going to see this guy's schedule and the thing's he's done this year? That's pretty personal and interesting— Oh. Never mind. It's a card trick."


It's stinky, brown and smelly 
As it chugs out of your belly


I will admit that I do like some of the methodology used in diary effects, and I've performed various tricks based on those methods. Below are three you might want to consider. The methods aren't mine to give away but as long as you know a method, you should be able to come up with a way to map these effects onto the standard presentation. There are those methods which allow for a freely chosen date and those where the date is generated in some way. The freer the selection of a date is, the more predictions you usually need to have on hand to ring in in some way.

Version 1 - Birthdate

Instead of a playing card in an envelope it's a birthday card. The spectator names a date. They look through my datebook and find which friend has a birthday on that date (or the closest to it). When they open the envelope it's a belated birthday card to that friend. 

Things to consider: You don't need a birthday on every date. You can have your spectator look for the closest birthday from that date. That can help a lot.

Version 2 -  Dinner Date

Taken from The Jerx, Volume One

So I thought of coming up with other versions of the effect. And while it wasn’t what I ended up doing with the trick, one of my interim ideas was to have all the food holidays listed in the datebook. If you google “food holidays” you’ll find that every day of the year has a food associated with it. So my idea was to have someone name any date, let’s imagine they say March 18th. We turn to that page in the diary and find that’s Oatmeal Cookie Day. On the table from the start is a cloche that you lift up to reveal a plate of oatmeal cookies underneath. 

Version 3 - Memento

This is the version I currently use. It was borne out of the, perhaps obvious, thought that it would be nice to do this style of effect with a datebook that was actually full of the types of things you might find in a datebook.

Imagine

I'm hanging out at my apartment with my friend Chelsea. At some point she sees me pull out a datebook, open it to today's date, and write, "Watched a movie with Chelsea," in it, and then I circle that entry. She asks what I'm doing and I tell her about this form of journaling I learned from my great aunt.

"Every day I write down the things I do and then I circle the activity that I enjoyed the most. Then, at the end of the year, I go through my datebook and look at all the circled items and think about what was the the highlight of the year and I take some memento of that activity and I carry it with me in the bill section of my wallet for the following year. It's a little superstitious ritual. The idea being that the 'good energy' of the souvenir you carry with you will bring you a whole year of positive, fun experiences. I'd usually pass it off as just nonsense, but there's something to it. I'll show you. Picture a calendar in your mind and flip through the pages. Now stop on one month. Now scan your eyes around the days and stop on one day. What's the date you're on?"

"March 21st," she says.

I smile and tell her to open the drawer in my coffee table and pull out my datebook from 2015. "Take a look. Every entry is different, right? Now what does it say on March 21st,"  She looks and finds the circled entry on that date says, Celebration Dinner with Charley at Artisanal. "That was the day my book proposal got accepted. Charley and I got fondue to celebrate. it was one of the best meals of my life. Check this out. Hand me my wallet."

She does. I open up the bill section and pull out a small envelope. I show her there's nothing else in the wallet. On the outside of the envelope it says, "Highlight of 2015." I tell her to pull out what's inside and it's a receipt for dinner for two at Artisanal with a congratulatory message written on the back by my friend Charley.

I rip a piece of paper out of a notebook and ask my friend to draw a little something on it. She asks why and I say, "Well, so I have something to remember this night by and carry with me next year." 

Method

The initial method is Bob Cassidy's diary effect, Chronologue. But I just don't use cards. I use tickets and receipts and stubs from shows and business cards and notes  and little photos and anything else small and flat that you might save. You just have to make sure they don't have a date on them. 

Then I use an Heirloom Deluxe wallet. This allows you to hold 20 outs and you can show your wallet empty after you remove the envelope.

I don't want to get into the workings of Chronologue but I will just say that once you're set up, a spectator can look through the date book and they are unlikely to notice anything. Especially with my version and series of predictions. With the 20 outs in the Heirloom Deluxe wallet the spectator can look over 5 weeks in either direction before anything similar comes up. And because you're not using playing cards, you can use different words to describe the event. "Went to the Knicks game" it could say in one spot. "Basketball game with Timmy," in another. "Hung out with Timmy all day. Caught a game at MSG," in another. And for each of these you would explain that you took your nephew, Timmy, to see the Knicks play. But in a casual look through of the book, even if your spectator specifically noticed both those entries, they wouldn't necessarily see them as the same. And they'll never really notice any two specific entries weeks apart. Not when they're written in different words, and when they're listed amongst many other events on that day.

 I use a cheatsheet in the back of my current year's datebook to let me know which envelope to pull from the wallet. 

I think I've given enough details here to make it fairly clear if you know Chronologue. It's a fun effect. The only not fun thing is making up the datebooks.


It's painful as it issues
From those hot and burning tissues
Diarrhea, cha, cha, cha
Diarrhea, cha, cha, cha

Double Hemispherectomy

Imagine

"Whoever the dumbest person at this table is, everyone else will chip in and buy their meal. So what is your evidence that you're the dumbest person here?" 

We go around the table and say why we're the dumbest person in the group.

One guy tells a story about getting caught in a bathrobe and having to call 911.

One girl tells the story about her 12-year marriage to a guy she didn't like from their first date on. 

Another guy tells the story of how, in college, he didn't like his roommates so he would pee in a soda bottle in his room so he wouldn't have to walk by them in the living room on his way to the bathroom. He would also eat his dinner secluded in his room as well. And one time, while eating his dinner, he took a big swig from the wrong soda bottle. 

I told the story of the time I went on a three-day water fast to experience what it was like. After 72 hours I broke my fast then went to bed. The next day I wake up and I go to piss and it comes out a deep crimson. Apparently I had fucked myself up on this water fast and was now peeing blood. I went to the emergency room and told the doctor I had been fasting for three days and now my pee was coming out blood red. He thought that was unusual and asked what I'd had when I broke the fast the previous night. "I didn't eat anything," I said. "I just drank a 2 liter bottle of Hawaiian Punch."

"Oh... I'm an idiot," I said to the doctor, and walked out of the room.

After debating it, we decided the guy who got stuck in his bathrobe was the biggest idiot.

Later, we stood out on the sidewalk while a couple friends were smoking. "It's not fair," I said. "I'm definitely the biggest idiot. I had my brain removed when I was four because of a parasite."

"You had your whole brain removed?" someone asked.

"Yup. I mean, except for something the size of an almond. Completely empty up there."

"Look," I said. I turned on my camera's flashlight and held it to my ear. "Can you see it coming out the other side?" I asked. They said no. "My ear is just too tightly closed, I guess. Can you see the light coming out of my mouth?" I asked and opened wide. Again they said no. 

"Huh..." I said. "That dangly thing in the back must be blocking the light. Can you push it to the side?" I asked one of my friends.

"Your uvula?" he said. "That's disgusting."

"Oh, come on," I said and reached my thumb deep into my mouth to push my uvula out of the way. Light comes pouring out of my mouth. I pull my hand out and the light disappears. 

"See," I said. "Nothing up there. The light just ricochets around my empty skull."

Method

A white D'lite.

Or not even that. The whole point of this is to sit around with your friends trying to fight for your position as the dumbest person in the group. The trick is just the punchline.

 

 

Calen Morelli - 365 Days of Magic

In the history of magic on the internet, there have been three transcendent artistic achievements. The first was the Magic Circle Jerk blog, the third is this blog, and in between was Calen Morelli's 365 Days of Magic. This was a project where Calen would create a new magic trick every day for a year and put it up on youtube. And I mean create, as in new tricks and new methods. Other people have tried similar thing, but were just performing a different trick each day. Which is fine and all, but not quite as interesting to me. The magician in me would rather see half-assed new stuff, rather than a perfected old routine. 

Calen only made it half the year into his project before he had to give it up. That may seem like a failure, but why did he have to give it up? Well, because he had to move to Vegas because he was hired to work for David Copperfield. So it's kind of hard to see that as a failure. That would be like if you had pledged to post a video of you ejaculating onto a picture of Anne Hathaway every day for a year. And then six months in you're like, "Sorry guys... I have to stop posting. I won't have time anymore because I'm getting married to Anne Hathaway."

For a couple years now it seemed like the videos Calen created for this project weren't on his youtube channel, but now I see they're back and I encourage you to go check them out if you haven't. You want to look about 5 years back. Starting with the video "Bending the Rules" and ending with "Lose the Sugar." [UPDATE: They're gone again.]

I was inspired a ton by Calen and I ended up adding a number of the effects that got their start during this project to my repertoire. Below are a few of my favorites. These have the added bonus that, if you're interested, you can learn them from Calen's Penguin Live lecture

Stop Hating Rick Lax

Every time Rick Lax posts a video on his Facebook page, I get an email from somebody making fun of it, and suggesting I make fun of it too. Here is what I hear the most:

  1. Asking people to like a video before watching a video seems like the height of desperation (or implying that they need to hit like to "lock in their answer" or something like that). 
  2. He chastises people for "stealing" his tricks and making their own versions of his videos when he didn't create the tricks in the first place.
  3. A lot of his interactive tricks are awful.
  4. His voice is painful to listen to.

Here, so I don't have to field your emails anymore, are my responses to these issues.

  1. That's just playing the game. Even with the heavy-handed "please like my videos" stuff, he's looking at maybe a couple percent of the people who watch a video actually "liking" it. Likes and shares are the currency of Facebook. He's, understandably, trying what he can to get those numbers up.
  2. Yeah, but I understand the inclination on his part. First, he's not going to mention that a lot of these effects are ancient on videos he's making for the public. That doesn't help him in any way. Second, he's trying to set up a brand. He's a "deception expert" who does interactive tricks on Facebook. When people copy him it undermines that brand and undermines the notion that there's anything special about him as a performer. "Wait... is this 12-year-old who just performed the identical trick a 'deception expert' too?" It's a double-edged sword really. He can rack up millions of views on a video because it's not too provocative. But at the same time, because the videos aren't really personality-driven they're open for anyone to just make their own version. 
  3. Ok, I agree with you. (He had one recently where he asked you to think of how many calories were in a bagel and then you were supposed to be amazed when he determined the last number in those calories was 0. Everyone (in the U.S. at least) thinks of calories in factors of 10 because that's how they're labeled on our food.) The problem Rick has is that he can't limit himself to posting on Facebook when he has a good idea. It's a marketing tool for him, so he needs to churn out content whether it's good or not-so-good. So if he has three good ideas per month, that might be better than you or I would have in a similar position. But it feels worse because he has three good ideas a month but makes 30 videos. So his batting average seems so much lower 
  4. If Rick wants to transition into more TV work or stage work (and I have no idea if he does) he needs to try to come across as more genuine. This is based on feedback I got when I pitched him for a television project I was involved in. I think Rick speaks in what he thinks is a presentational and confident manner but it can seem inauthentic to adults (who are probably not his target audience).

That's the other thing. Rick's Facebook tricks are not, primarily, geared towards adults. (And certainly not towards magicians.) His most recent post, as of this writing, tells you to share a video or else be cursed and visited by a disembodied hand. And obviously any trick with a math formula like, "Choose a secret number, now add 4 to it, now subtract your secret number..." is not something you try on high school graduates. So to complain and say, "Blech, this isn't good magic," kind of misses the point. 

It would be like watching this kid's video and being like, "You know... I don't think he's a great hardcore rapper."

The thing is, Rick is trying to do something very difficult. There are three good interactive tricks and he burned through them in his first few videos, now he has to try and repackage that content and expand his brand to keep people entertained. It's easy to criticize an individual video but it's not like there are a bunch of other people doing what he's trying to do better. 

It would be especially easy for me to criticize. Rick and I have opposite goals in magic and in our online presence. I don't ask you to "like" my posts. In fact, I don't give a shit if you literally like my posts. You have to go out of your way to share things I write or interact with me.

But that doesn't mean I don't respect what Rick is trying to do.

And even if you can't respect it, don't waste energy hating the guy. There is a lot you can take from his Facebook success. Do yourself a favor and scroll through some of the videos. It might be a surprising education for you. Some videos have 50 million views. And some, while high, are nowhere near that much. And it has nothing to do with how strong the magic is. In fact, the videos that most magicians would think are the best tend to get significantly less views. 

No, it's not "the stronger the magic the more views" it's "the more interactive the magic the more views." I think this is telling. And while "views" aren't the sole metric to define good magic, they are a pretty good metric to define engagement. And don't you want your magic to be engaging? The truth is, Rick interacts more with his spectator's in a Facebook video than most magicians do when they're sitting across the table from them. When, in reality, it should be fifty times more powerful to be in the room with the person. 

Let that be what you take from Rick Lax's Facebook videos and extrapolate it into your live performances. Don't just be demonstrating an ability at your spectators. Instead make it clear that this moment requires their presence; that it's feeding off of their input and interaction like a living entity. 


Coming Soon: In a past issue of X-Communication, I mentioned a post I would be writing soon called Presenting the Unpresentable. That should be up in the next week or two. In the past few months I've approached presenting certain kinds of "process" heavy tricks from a different angle—partly inspired by what I was discussing above—and have had a lot of success with it. So that will be coming soon. If I get enough likes on this post.

Monday Night Magic

Andy (me) and the GLOMM get a shout-out at Monday Night Magic in New York City. Thanks Patrick and David!

Next, David Copperfield, maybe? I mean, why wouldn't he? Unless he doesn't adhere to the GLOMM's Code of Ethics. Every day that passes without him mentioning the GLOMM makes me wonder.

Final Day

Tomorrow I finalize the details in regards to how many copies of The Jerx, Volume One will actually be printed, so today is your last day to get your order in or reserve a copy at the current price and with the bonuses. See my June 24th post for details.

I want to thank everyone who has donated to the site in order to receive the book. Your support has allowed me to take a chunk of my time every week that I should be working and devote it to this site instead. I especially want to thank those who were on board that first week—that first day even. When I think of it, it's a huge compliment that there was a not-insignificant number of people who ponied up a not-insignificant amount of money, for something they wouldn't receive for many months to come, by a first-time author, who writes anonymously—especially in the world of magic that's filled with a-holes taking money and then never actually delivering what they claimed. Everyone who likes this site owes the people who stepped-up early on a debt of gratitude because the site wouldn't be here without them. 

And it's nice to get a bump in orders in these final weeks too. So don't think I don't appreciate you, you slackers and loafers. You're my people. And that's going to help keep posting fairly regular at least until Fall rolls around.

Also thanks to Jerx: France. I'm not sure what happened but I ended up with a handful of orders from there in the past week or so. I can't imagine reading this site if English isn't your first language. And I'm sure it's a total abortion if it goes through an online translator, so it amazes me that anyone can sift their way through this site in that way.

So, just generally, thanks to everyone who has supported the site via buying the book. I would happily sell-out in a minute if Ellusionist, or whoever, dropped a nickel and it rolled my way. But until that time, I'm happy to keep this baby independent and user supported. 

By the way, when I asked how long it would take for the book to be ready I was told "a few weeks after the file has been approved." My hope is that means I should be able to ship the book in August. I think that's a conservative date, but maybe I'm being naive. I will keep everyone who orders updated on that.


For those who are curious about things like this:

About 60% of the book orders came from the U.S.

About 25% of those U.S. orders came from LA.

About 50% of the non-U.S. orders came from England.

One person in China ordered the book. He's literally 1 in a billion.

Nobody in any of the following states ordered the book. (If you're in one of these states and think you did, make sure to email me.)

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arkansas
  • Colorado
  • Delaware
  • Idaho
  • Kentucky
  • Maine
  • Mississippi
  • Missouri
  • Montana
  • Nebraska
  • New Hampshire
  • New Mexico
  • North Dakota
  • Rhode Island
  • South Dakota
  • Utah
  • Vermont
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin
  • Wyoming

Magic is fun; We're dead

I love this commercial for the movie Magic. The movie was the inspiration for one of the tricks in The Jerx, Volume 1. And the poem in the ad gives that trick its name

This may be apocryphal but apparently this commercial only ran once and it scared kids so much, and parents complained so much, that it was taken off the air. I like to think that's true.

If you're a horror movie fan, there's a service called Shudder which is like Netflix but only for horror. It's $4.99 a month. And Magic is one of the movies in their library. They also have a link there for Shudder TV which is constantly streaming horror movies and it's free.


Speaking of horrors. This fucking mutant has been identified as David Drowley aka Twister the Clown. Rot in hell, old man. And you're out of the GLOMM.  

Oh, and going forward I will be including people's shitty magic names (e.g., Twister the Clown) with their real name on the banned members page of the GLOMM website. You're not going to dodge being associated with that name for eternity. 

Regarding "eternity," I was informed that one of the guys on the banned list died in prison recently. Tough. When you get banned from the GLOMM it's everlasting.

Thanks to Kamal "The Pedo Hunter" Farmer for going through the court records and tracking down the name of this guy.


I knew this looked familiar.