Gardyloo #9 - OOTW Edition

Regarding Out of This World, Andrew Skinner reminded me of the Derren Brown presentation with photographs separated between living and dead. And with that in mind I will once again remind you of an incredibly versatile non-magic magic purchase, the Polaroid ZIP mobile printer, first mentioned in this post in conjunction with a Tomas Blomberg effect. I like the idea of OOTW with photos and I like it even better if we're talking about pictures that were just taken. Imagine a 60th birthday party and you take photos of everyone there, then later when things are winding down you show the person whose birthday it is an OOTW style effect with the photos. 

Maybe you have two piles "Invite back next year" and "Don't invite next year." Then the birthday-boy separates the photos and it's found that all his white friends are in one pile and his ethnic friends are in another. You give him a wink and a nod. "Good. I'm glad we're on the same page about this." you say.

You can have them separate photos face down, of course, or face-up and have something be on the back of the photos as in Derren's version linked above. Or you can have them separate them face-up with nothing on the back, but then it turns out there is some hidden aspect that all of the photos have in common, like, "Now, I asked you to just use your subconscious and separate the cards that gave you a good vibe from the ones that gave you a bad vibe." And then you give him a magnifying glass and point out that way in the background of all the "bad vibe" photos is his wife.

Whatever direction you go with it, you pop the photos in an album at the end of the effect and you have a perfect, personalized gift.


Pete McCabe thinks I should have called the electro-shock presentation, Ow! of This World.

Sorry I failed you, pun-nerds. 


Does anyone remember this hunk of shit?

Late 80s, first-run syndicated sitcoms all make me feel sick. Small Wonder, Mama's Family, It's a Living, Charles in Charge, She's the Sheriff. 

Or how about What a Dummy? I can't find any video of it anywhere. It was like Alf but with a living ventriloquist dummy instead of an alien. This is one of the few promo shots you can find online and it legit looks like it was torn from some serial-killer's inspiration journal.


If you want to up the ante on the electric shock presentation from the last post, or if the Pavlok mentioned in the previous post is too expensive, may I recommend the Eastern Delights® Elite Erotic Electro Stimulation Sex Cock Enlarge Expander Penis Ring Cock Ring Male Genital Desensitizer Delay WITH Red Pouch.

It's only $25.

Out Of This AHHHH!!!!

One of my favorite tricks I've ever developed is my version of Out of This World. It will be in The Jerx Volume 1. And in preparation for writing it up --in fact, to see if it would even be included-- I read through every version of OOTW that I could find, including the book Best of All Worlds by Brent Geris. That book collects about 50 different versions of the effect and I read through it very tentatively at first because I wasn't looking forward to finding out my handling or presentation wasn't original. If you've ever been eating something and out of your peripheral vision you get the sense you maybe dripped something on your shirt, and then you kind of slowly tilt your head down to look -- that was how I was reading the book. I was in no hurry to be disappointed. 

But as I read, I was surprised to find that virtually all the versions were the exact same effect: the spectator somehow separates the red cards from the black cards.

Well, no shit, Andy. That's the effect of Out of This World.

Ok, that's true, but I think it's helpful to differentiate the outcome of a trick from the effect of a trick. Yes, the outcome of OOTW is that the cards are dealt into all red and all black, but that outcome can be the result of different effects. The version I write up in the book has nothing to do with the spectator's ability to separate cards. That's just a byproduct of another uncanny event that's going on. 

I bring this up for a few reasons. First, that OOTW book, while great, is also a good example of magician-centric magic. 50 different ways to tell what is ultimately the same story. It's fascinating to look at the options from the magician's perspective, but it doesn't help you entertain anyone. I've performed the most clever handlings and I've performed the basic one out of the trade paperback version of Scarne on Card Tricks that I got from a grocery store when I was 11. There isn't a huge difference in the reaction to the trick based on changing up the handling. But you can have a significantly increased reaction based on the presentation, and that, in turn, can VASTLY increase the memorability of the effect.

The big subtext of the Jerx Book is about the power of magic to make memories. As you probably gathered from this post last week about slowing time, this is a big preoccupation of mine. The unfortunate thing about magic is the things we like practicing or thinking about (new sleights and clever methods) aren't usually the things that reverberate with the spectators. I'm just saying you might want to invest some time thinking about that stuff. Or not, I'll do the thinking for both of us.

The second reason I bring this up is because I just came up with a new handling for OOTW. It won't replace my current favorite, but it's pretty damn good.

Out Of This AHHHH!!!!

I've only performed this twice, but it's an incredibly fun presentation for OOTW. I came up with this last week after a friend showed me a new gadget he had purchased. The gadget costs $200. But I have an alternative for you that's just as good and costs, literally, 1 cent. 

When most people perform OOTW the presentation amounts to, "Look, you've separated the red cards from the black cards." Sometimes they'll make it about intuition or male and female energy, or some other slapped on bullshit. Or the magician will make it about himself, "I'm bestowing upon you the power to separate cards by color without seeing them." Gee, thanks, Mr. Magician! Please don't let this beautiful dream ever end! Even if you don't explicitly take credit for you, audiences will give you the credit when the only other option is that they themselves have some unknown power. They know they don't have this power so you must have done something tricky.

But what if you could make it really feel like you were training someone to develop some low-level psychic ability. Wouldn't that be worth an investment of a few minutes? Wouldn't it be more memorable if you could truly shift the power of the effect to the spectator?

Introducing Pavlok. This is some weirdo device that you strap on your wrist and shock yourself when you want to smoke or eat sugar or beat-off to children or whatever.  This negative reinforcement will, theoretically, get you to stop doing these things. 

You're going to strap it on your spectator's wrist and shock the fuck out of them until they're psychic.

Here's what you do. First, you let them know what's going to happen. Don't be a dick and spring it on them. This thing doesn't really hurt, but it is unpleasant. Just let them know what they're getting into. You can dial down the shock so it's very mild, or if you're performing for a real tough guy, turn it up. It's the type of sensation where it hurts you but you laugh about it at the same time. 

Give them a deck of cards to shuffle. Take the deck back and hold up cards one by one with their backs to the the spectator and have them guess if they're red or black. Shock them every time they're wrong. After about a third of the deck has been dealt only shock them and tell them they're wrong every other time they make a mistake. At the midway point, stop and take a break. Pour them a glass of water. Start up again. When you're about 2/3rds of the way into the deck, only buzz them every third mistake. Don't make a mention of it. Let them feel like they must be getting more accurate. The implication here being that somehow their subconscious mind is becoming better at picking up the color of the card, or perhaps better at communicating it's knowledge of the color of the card to the conscious mind. You don't need to explain it. When you're done, pour them a little more water, have them do a couple deep breaths, mix up the cards and go into your favorite OOTW.

(Yes, this starts with a shuffled deck, but as you deal through the cards during this test phase and place the cards in a pile, just side-jog all the black cards. After the initial deal through you can strip the black cards out, put them on top and give them a false shuffle or a red-black shuffle and you're good to go. (Of course that depends on which version of OOTW you do, but at most you'll just have to do a couple cuts to get into position.))

If you don't want to shell out $200 for a shocking wrist-band, use the analogue version: a rubber-band. Have your spectator put it on her wrist and place her palm flat on the table. Each time she gets the color wrong you snap it. When you have just a few cards left in the test round, start pulling up the rubber band further and further from her wrist, until you get to the last card and you're pulling it as tight as it will go. Increase the literal and figurative tension as much as possible. If she gets the last one right, show it to her, then gently set the band back down. If she gets it wrong, don't show it to her, but imply she got it right by putting the card down and setting the band back gently.

Some old nerds are going to lecture me. "How dare you treat your spectator like that! I'm sorry, but I don't need to give someone an electric shock in order to make my magic memorable. Blah, blah, blah." To which I say: Go! Get off my site! I don't want you here. 

The effect isn't memorable because they're somehow physically or mentally scarred by electric shocks or the flick of a rubber band. What makes the trick memorable is there is an inherent narrative to it. "He put this thing on my wrist that could shock me. And he started by testing me and every time I got one wrong he would shock me. At first I was only getting half right. But after a few shocks I started getting better and better. Then eventually I was able to deal through the entire deck with no mistakes!" You start somewhere and end up somewhere new. That's a progression that affects people. That's what makes it memorable. (As opposed to how OOTW is traditionally presented which is, "Somehow you did this thing." That's essentially a non-presentation. And you can get away with it because it's such a strong trick. But strong tricks can be elevated too.)

Inform your spectator the effects of this training are sadly temporary. "If you want to do it again you'll need to train for a longer time and with something more painful. Do you have a waffle-headed framing-hammer at home?"


If bringing a little mild pain to your spectator isn't your scene, be sure to check out the OOTW routine in The Jerx book, From the Shadows of the Shallow End. It's another presentation that takes people on a journey, but this one is all positive and painless, and it leaves them with a physical relic of the effect that they will keep forever.

Spring Cleaning

Welcome back to The Jerx.

As you'll notice, I've cleaned up all the Splooge. I mean, the posts are still there, but the design is now back to the normal Jerx site.

Some quick notes before we move forward...


I removed the Amazon and Vanishing Inc affiliate links from the side bar. I prefer the esthetic of the site without them and they weren't used often enough to merit keeping them there. As I've stated, this site is going to be around as long as people continue to support it. But the impression I get from you guys is that you'd rather do so in more pro-active, direct ways. That's cool with me. I think with a smaller audience that's probably the way it needs to be done anyway. 

You can still find the links on the Support the Site page if you're so inclined, they just won't be in the sidebar.


Regarding the Splooge post about slowing time, Marc Kerstein reminded me about this app where you take 1 second of video every day and it puts it all together into one video. 

I like that idea too, although I think pulling out your camera can sometimes be a more intrusive way to capture the highlight of your day than writing down one sentence at the end of the day. Especially if the highlight of your day was getting a blowjob from your barista or something.

I will probably end up doing both: keeping the one sentence journal and keeping the 1 second video diary. The journal capturing what's going on in my mind and the video capturing the external experience.


Also via Marc Kerstein's twitter I was turned on to Patrick Kun's youtube videos which collect his Instagram performances. They're called Unseen Magic and there are 5 up so far. Here is the most recent one.

As far as I'm concerned, this is about as perfect a representation of magic as you'll see online. Patrick is super skilled. Everything is quick and fun and visual. And it's magic for the sake of magic. It's not some bullshit "prank," it's not using magic to tell us about neuroscience, it's not some hacky interactive trick. He talks the way a normal human does to other humans as opposed to like he's trying to sell you something. The best compliment I can give is that it makes me want to get out and perform.


Hey guys, quit trying to bait me into making fun of Rick Lax. Rick got upset when I called him a "dull whitey" in this post. So I told him I wouldn't tease him anymore, and that's that.

So when people like Paul Sherman email me things like this:

Subject: How did Rick Lax do it?!

Andy,

Had to pass this along:

https://www.facebook.com/DeceptionExpert/videos/538131729702018/

Spooky, right?! I mean, how could he have known what planet or star I would think of, when the only limitation was that it begin with the last letter of the name of the first superhero I could think of?

Well, it took me a while, but I think I've finally cracked it, and now I'm working up my own routine with a similar method. Would love to get your feedback
:

Quick, think of your favorite manufacturer of gelatin-based desserts.

Now think of the last letter of that manufacturer's name. Example: Knox = X.

Are you thinking of your letter?

Now think of an American President or a Canadian Prime Minister whose last name begins with that letter. So if you're thinking of "C," you might think "Jean Chrétien."

Are you thinking of a president or prime minister?

Focus.

Are you focusing?

Well I Hope you don't Change your mind, because right now you're thinking of President Barack Obama.

Like and Share!

Best,
Paul

... there's really nothing for me to say. Yes, Rick's trick is phenomenal. I suppose if you were a master of linguistics or a "deception expert" like Rick, you might be able to discern a pattern in the last letter of many of the most popular superhero names.  

Superman
Batman (and Robin)
Ironman
Wonder Woman
Spider-Man
Aquaman

Maybe there's a pattern. Is there? I don't know. Give me a minute... I'm just not seeing one. Sorry, I'm not an alphabet expert, fer chrissakes. I just don't have the time it would take to examine them that close.

And then I just think of the name of ANY planet (or star) that begins with the last letter? Such freedom!

Most people would suggest that Rick's examples give the trick away. If you're thinking of the Hulk or Thor, he notes, you'd be thinking of the letter K or R. Now just think of your favorite planet (or star) that begins with a K or R. 

Ooh... hmm... do I have to narrow it down to one? So many possibilities. How will I ever choose?

But I think it's just the opposite. And I would actually flesh out those example so people realize just how many options they have. "Perhaps you're thinking of the Hulk. And the last letter is K, so you're going through your mental catalog of stars and planets that begin with K and removing one. For example... maybe K-Pax, the home to Kevin Spacey's character in the movie of the same name."

"Or if you're thinking of Thor, your letter would be R and you might be thinking of your favorite star: RA 05:55:10.306, Dec +07:24:25.35 (2000.0)."

And the great thing is, by mentioning these common examples you make it less likely for your spectator to name them. Sweet!


Before the lifestyle blog transition, I mentioned I'd hopefully be posting a new trick on here that didn't fit in the book. As of now there's a small possibility the trick is going to be used in an upcoming tv special. So I'm waiting to hear back on that. If it is used, then I'll make a secret explanation site that will go out to the people who bought the book after the special airs. If it's not used then I will post it here in the relatively near future for everyone.

 

The Secret To Happiness

How could we forget those ancient myths that stand at the beginning of all races, the myths about dragons that at the last moment are transformed into princesses? Perhaps all the dragons in our lives are princesses who are only waiting to see us act, just once, with beauty and courage. Perhaps everything that frightens us is, in its deepest essence, something helpless that wants our love.

-- Rainer Maria Rilke - Letters to a Young Poet

Following up on the previous post on how not to shit your pants, here is how to achieve eternal happiness.

Two caveats:

1. I'm trying to explain something that is my natural mindset, and I'm not quite sure how to do it. It would be like if you had a fetish for testicular trauma. That's not something someone talked you into, that's just how you are. So how would you try and talk someone else into it? Maybe you can't reason someone into this way of thinking. I don't know.

2. There's a chance if you adopt this mindset you'll be seen as some stepford-wife type automaton. A lot of people see happy people as superficial, or one-dimensional, or mindless. If people get the sense that you're happy most of the time, then they'll think you're an idiot or a liar. "Poor guy. He's too dumb to realize he shouldn't be happy. Or he's lying about being happy."

People can’t conceive of a virtue in someone else that they can’t conceive in themselves. Instead of believing you’re stronger, it’s so much easier to imagine you’re weaker. You’re addicted to self-abuse. You’re a liar. People are always ready to believe the opposite of what you tell them.

-- Chuck Palahniuk - Survivor

The good news is, when you know the secret to happiness, you don't really give a shit about what people say anyway. 

And it may be a mistake to call it the secret to happiness. I don't know what will make you happy. If you don't have things in your life that bring you joy, you're screwed. These don't have to be big things, they probably shouldn't be in fact. If your happiness is dependent on a perfect relationship, with a loving family, and a rewarding job; your happiness is very tenuous. That's a lot of shit that's outside of your control. If your spouse cheats on you with your boss, your world crumbles. You need to be able to find your happiness in smaller things -- that is, happiness in: finding new music, excitement for films that are coming out, friends, a really good grilled cheese, sports, sex, nature, meeting new people, a new magic book, pets, skipping work, a back massage, television, doing nice things for others, jokes, this website... these sorts of things.

This is the part of the equation people understand: you need to appreciate the small pleasures. But the corollary to this is even more important: you need to forget the big miseries.

You can't really forget them, of course, but you can recontextualize the things that lead to unhappiness: failure, mistakes, tragedy, disappointment, rejection and loss.

Why is the Basketball Hoop Ten Feet High?

That's not a riddle. I'm genuinely asking. Why is it ten feet high? You've gone out and shot baskets before, right? Wouldn't it be a lot easier if it was five feet high and five feet in diameter? Then you could just walk up to it and drop the ball in without all that hectic jumping and throwing of the ball. 

But no one would ever play that game. Not only is it not the game you would play with someone else, but it's not the game you would play with yourself. Even when no one else is around we still crave challenge and adversity. We're entertained by them. 

The Secret to Happiness: Treat Your Life Like an Auto-Scrolling Video Game

Remember the auto scrolling levels of Mario where the background moved along at a constant pace and you just have to keep going or you get crushed or pushed off a cliff or something?

That is life.

The difficulties in life are like the pits, and the bullet things, and the turtles with wings. Those are the things that make the whole process interesting. A game without them would be dull to the point of unplayable.

The mistake we make is imagining a "perfect" life as a life without difficulties. The perfect life is not a life without these things. The perfect life is one where you skillfully navigate through these things.

When you see life like this, you don't look at loss, pain, failure, mistakes, and tragedy as some kind of karmic abuse meant to punish you. They're just the obstacles that are there to challenge you and make the game rewarding. 

When you play a game and you're struck with some impediment, you're not like, "Oh, why me! What did I do to deserve this?! How will I ever pick myself back up again?" You're just like, "Hmmm... okay... now what's the best way to handle this?" And you actually become better going forward because you're constantly learning from your difficulties, not just bemoaning them. You might think you'd have to be a robot to handle the difficulties in life the same way, but I think once you view life from this perspective it just becomes kind of automatic. 

Let's say your wife got trampled to death during a terrorist attack at Wrestlemania. You might think, "I'd just be a broken man. I'd never be able to move on." Well, what good does that do anyone?  It's not an insult to your former wife's memory to feel the pain and then quickly press on. No amount of suffering is going to bring her back. There's nothing noble about being paralyzed by sorrow. So you look at the situation and say,  "Hmmm... okay... now what's the best way to handle this?" I don't know what the answer to that question would be for you, but there is an answer. 

We have no reason to harbor any mistrust against our world, for it is not against us. If it has terrors, they are our terrors; if it has abysses, these abysses belong to us; if there are dangers, we must try to love them. And if only we arrange our life in accordance with the principle which tells us that we must always trust in the difficult, then what now appears to us as the most alien will become our most intimate and trusted experience. 

-- Rainer Maria Rilke - Letters to a Young Poet

When I explain this idea to people -- that I don't think of bad things as bad things -- but just the impediments that have randomly been spat out at you that you get to deal with in your life, some people have compared it to the philosophy of Stoicism. 

“If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.” 

-- Marcus Aurelius - Meditations

Of the philosophical writings I've read, I've understood like 40%. Most of it is way over my head. But of that 40%, much of what I've agreed with does come from the Stoics. But my personal philosophy kind of veers off wildly from their's. Stoics believe you shouldn't let negative things affect you. But they also think you shouldn't really let positive things affect you that much either. 

That's not my scene. That feels like playing it safe to me. Worse, it feels like surrender. "Okay, here's the deal, universe. I won't get too high so you can't slap me back down to earth. Okay?" I think it's better to just wring every drop of happiness and get as high as possible on every good thing in your life. And fuck it if things don't work out as you'd hoped at every moment. That's part of the game. 

If you're not sure where to start with this mindset, I suggest trying it with something simple that frustrates you. Maybe traffic or those idiots you work with. Instead of being bothered or angered by every bozo who cuts you off or co-worker who screws up yet another project, just look at them like the Goombas in Mario. The goal of the game is to get through these things, not freak out about them.

(I had to learn this myself when I first came to New York City. It used to bother me to no end the way tourists would move about the streets. Stopping in the middle of the sidewalk. Stopping at the end of escalators! THE MOTHERFUCKING END OF ESCALATORS!!!! Ok, so I still have some residual issues to deal with. I would wonder how I could get more upset with someone walking slowly than I was with someone... say, stealing money from me. It was because I recognized the latter as an obstacle and those I was okay with. It was inconveniences that would really get under my skin. I had adopted this mindset on a macro level before I had it on a micro level. But inconveniences were always going to be there, so the game was going to be in how I handled them. After that realization, when someone would do a dead-stop in the middle of a crowded sidewalk so they could get a closer look at a building or a pigeon or some shit, I would no longer ask them if they'd been kicked in the fucking head by a donkey. Instead I'd swiftly swing around them, tapping them on the head gently with my open palm and saying "boop" while I went. That was my way of "killing" them in the game in my mind. And I was a much happier pedestrian.)

The goal of this attitude is happiness, but the side-effect is that you become fearless. Not brave really, because you're not acting in the face of fear. You just genuinely don't have fear of things. If loss, pain, failure, mistakes, and tragedy are just seen as the challenges you get to work around in the game of your life, they become neutral at worst. You sign up for the marathon. You ask the girl out. You quit your job and start your own business. And if these things don't work out, you just continue forward. And soon you realize that most of these mistakes and failures you were concerned about don't even present themselves as obstacles later on. You adopt the mindset that adversity is there for you to maneuver through. Which allows you to feel free to attempt things you might not have for fear of failure. And then you learn that failure didn't even present the adversity you thought it would. 

But Andy, I don't want challenges and obstacles. I don't want to overcome things. I just want an easy life. That's what would make me happy.

Okay, okay, I hear you. Do you want to know the easiest way to go through life? Be fucking braindead! You won't have to pay rent. No one will turn you down for a date. You won't have to put Christmas lights up only to take them down a month later. You can be fed through a tube and shit through a tube. It's your dream life. Go huff copier toner.

[Next Week: I bring even more happiness to your life as this site reverts to The Jerx and we talk magic.]

How To Not Shit Your Pants

If you ever have to go to the bathroom really bad, like maybe you're in your car and you're 10 minutes from the next rest stop, start stroking your junk. Being sexually aroused blocks out your need to shit.

Well, it works for me, at any rate.

This may not be the best idea if you're on public transportation.

Also, be careful when you're driving. If you end up crashing into the median you'll be found in the worst of all possible situations: with your dick in your hand and your underpants full of dookie. And then it will work its way around everyone who attends your funeral that you got turned on by shitting yourself. Then someone will be like, "Ah, damn, I wish he hadn't died. I have the doubly-perfect nickname for him now." And everyone will be like, "What's that?" And he'll say, "Skidmarks." And everyone will be all, "RIP, Skidmarks."

The Meta-Universal Conversation Interjection Conversation

Okay, I admit it. That last "tip" was bullshit. There was no University of Delaware study. If you walk up to a group and say, "Oh... shit!" they're likely to think you're a little strange, at best. Even if it fits in perfectly with the conversation, it's still odd to just inject yourself into a discussion with no preamble.

But now I've set you up for the Meta-Universal Conversation Interjection Conversation.

Here's how it works. You enter the party or the gathering. Everyone is paired up or grouped off. You find a group that looks cool and slide your way into the conversation.

"Ohhhh... shit!" you say.

They all turn to you and cock their heads wondering what your deal is.

"Hmmm...," you say, "Well... I guess that was bullshit. Sorry. I was feeling a little awkward on my way here because I don't really know anyone. And I googled some tricks to work your way into a conversation. And I found this one site... I don't know... it said 'Oh shit' was like a conversational skeleton key that could fit into any exchange. Apparently the University of Delaware did a study on it. I don't know what I was thinking."

You take out your phone and show them this post (the previous post) that you had been reading in your car before the event.

You see? I didn't just give you a universal conversation interjection. I gave you a complete ice-breaking conversation that is at least mildly interesting and makes you look:

a) relatable - Everyone has had a situation where they feel a little awkward at an event where they don't know anyone
b) confident - Confident enough to acknowledge feeling awkward and then be self-deprecating about it

Now, if you happen to hit it off with the group of people or someone in that group, I suggest you come clean and have the Meta-Meta-Universal Conversation Interjection Conversation Conversation. This is where you say, "Look, I knew that 'oh shit' thing wasn't going to work when I said it. I just thought you looked like a fun group and that was my excuse to come talk to you."

At least, that's how I'd play it.

The Universal Conversation Interjection

If you're at a party or a gathering of some sort where you don't know anyone, it can be awkward to work your way into a conversation, especially if everyone has already splintered into little groups.

So here's what you do. Just squeeze your way into the circle of people or sit at their table. You don't need to know what they're talking about. And then say, "Ohhhh... shit!"

This exclamation seamlessly fits into any conversation.

"I just got engaged!" -- "Ohhhh... shit!"
"I just got fired." -- "Ohhhh... shit!"
"I'm going to Tahiti." -- "Ohhhh... shit!"
"I found a duffel bag filled with cash." -- "Ohhhh... shit!"
"My wife just drove my kids into the lake." -- "Ohhhh... shit!"
"Did you hear what Trump said?" -- "Ohhhh... shit!"
"How many guys can I blow and not be gay?" -- "Ohhhh... shit!"
"What's a four-letter word for excrement?" --  "Ohhhh... shit!"

This isn't just me talking. In 2012, The University of Delaware studied over 200 conversational interjections and "Oh, shit," was rated the highest in regards to situational appropriateness and meaning (the second highest rated interjection was, "Damn... that's fucked up"). Apparently the phrase is something of a conversational Rorshach test. People project a meaning on it that goes with whatever the nature and flow of the conversation is.

Give it a shot the next time you're feeling a little out-of-place at a social function.